Attachment B - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.pdf
PDF 575 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24624R0017
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and cover letter template for a federal construction project. The questionnaire is to evaluate an architectural and engineering firm's performance on a previous campus wide camera system replacement project for the Central VA Health Care System. Respondents to the current solicitation for an A/E firm must provide this questionnaire to references for at least six past projects. References are asked to evaluate the firm's performance on metrics such as meeting contractual requirements, quality of work, and corrective actions. References must return the completed questionnaire by January 18, 2024 via email to the contract specialist listed. The current solicitation number is 36C24624R0017 for campus wide camera system replacement services with the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 6.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C24624R0017.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment G - PROJECT LOCATION PLAN.pdf | ||
| Attachment C - SF330.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOLICITATION ATTACHMENT - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE AND
COVER LETTER
Complete one set of letters and forms for at least six (6) projects identified in your firm’s SF 330 Section F, Example Projects Which Best Illustrate Proposed Team’s Qualifications for This Contract. Additional space or blank sheets may be added to answer any question.
Transmittal Letter to Accompany Past Performance Questionnaire
FROM: [Insert Company Official Name, Title, and Company Name]
SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Contract(s):
[Insert Company Name] is currently responding to VHA Network Contracting Office 6 and the Central VA Health Care System (CVVHS), regarding a request for SF 330, Architect/Engineer Qualifications for Project 652-23-105, A/E Campus Wide Camera System Replacement. This Request for SF 330’s requires respondents to identify customers and solicit their response regarding [Insert Company Name] performance.
[Insert Company Name] is providing past performance data to VHA Network Contracting Office 6 relating to our performance on contract [Insert contract name/number] and have identified [Insert name of reference] as the point of contact for this contract.
The request for SF 330 instructs that respondents provide customers with the attached questionnaire. Please complete the questionnaire (Sections B and C) and return it by no later than 2:00 PM EST, January 18, 2024. Return the completed questionnaire directly to the Government Contract Specialist, Moses Deng, via email at:
Moses.Deng2@va.gov.
*Do not return this form to the AE firm requesting the reference.*
A. GENERAL INFORMATION A-E
FIRM TO BE EVALUATED:
Firm Name:
Address:
DUNS Number:
Project Title: _____________________________________
Description of Project:
Description of A-E Firms’ Responsibilities:
Contract Number: ______________________ Dollar Amount: ______________________
Contract Period of Performance: _______________________
The A-E Firm performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor/Consultant/Team Member
Percent of work performed by A-E Firm:
B. EVALUATOR INFORMATION:
Evaluator’s Company or Agency Name:
Company or Agency Address:
Evaluator’s Name:
Title of Evaluator:
Telephone:
E-mail:
C. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate rating that most accurately describes the A/E’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ALL RATINGS OF Marginal or Unsatisfactory on page 7 under Narrative Summary.
Exceptional (5) Very Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Marginal (2) Unsatisfactory (1) N/A
-Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded many of your company’s expectations. The contractual performance reflects or reflected few minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be highly effective or corrective actions taken were effective.
-Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded some of your company’s expectations. The contractual performance reflects or reflected some minor problems and corrective actions being taken by the contractor appear to be effective or Corrective actions taken were effective.
-Performance meets or met contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects or reflected some minor problems.
Corrective actions being taken by the contractor appear to be effective or Corrective actions taken were effective.
-Performance does or did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects or reflected serious problems(s) for which the contractor has not yet identified acceptable corrective actions or did not provide acceptable corrective actions.
-Performance does or did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely or did not occur. The contractual performance contains or contained serious problem (s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear ineffective or were ineffective.
-Not applicable or rater has not observed performance in this area.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the above definitions matrix.
Number of A/E Design Errors & Omissions on Project: _______________ Increased Project Cost Due to A/E Design Errors & Omissions:_______________
NARRATIVE SUMMARY REGARDING PERFORMANCE:
D. SEND COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE, VIA EMAIL, TO:
Moses Deng, Contract Specialist Email: Moses.Deng2@va.gov Networking Contracting Office (NCO 6)
VHARICLucenM Highlight
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .