Attachment B - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 19 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24424Q1026
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity for dialysis water testing services. The Questionnaire provides instructions for completing the form, which includes sections for Contractor Identification, Evaluator Information, and an assessment of the contractor's performance across several elements such as quality of services, timeliness, and business relations. The questionnaire uses a five-point adjectival rating scale (Excellent, Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory) and requests narrative explanations for Marginal or Unsatisfactory ratings.
The related federal contract opportunity is a Request for Quote (RFQ) for a five-year, firm-fixed-price Indefinite Delivery - Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for dialysis water testing services at the Pittsburgh VA Medical Center. The solicitation is set aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSB), and the contract is anticipated to begin on 11/15/2024. The Statement of Work details the specific requirements, and offerors are required to provide pricing information on the attached Pricing Schedule (Attachment C).
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Question and Answer.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24424Q1026 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment C - Price Schedule.docx | DOCX document | |
| Combined Synopsis - 36C24424Q1026 - Dialysis Water Testing - 646.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment D - Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Attachment A - Statement of Work.pdf | ||
| 36C24424Q1026.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT B
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION NUMBER – 36C24424Q1026
Dialysis Water testing
PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND PAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT. PLEASE SEND THE COMPLETED FORM TO EDWARD FERKEL, EDWARD.FERKEL@VA.GOV. SOLICITATION CLOSE DATE IS OCTOBER 15, 2024 AT 10:00AM.:
I. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION:
Contractor:
Contract Number:
Period of Performance:
Negotiated price or cost at award:
Current estimated contract dollar amount:
Describe service acquired:
II. EVALUATOR INFORMATION:
Name:
Organization:
Phone Number:
Relation to Program:
(i.e., Contracting Officer, Program Manager, Contract Specialist/Administrator, Contracting Officer's Technical Representative, etc.)
Time On Contract:
III. ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS: Narrative statements are vital. Please provide a narrative for each element below and then an adjectival rating under pars. III.A2, III.B.2, III.C.2, and an overall Past/Present Performance Adjectival Rating under par. III.F based on the attached Adjectival Rating Descriptions. Attach additional pages if there is insufficient space in the comment space.
PERFORMANCE ADJECTIVAL RATINGS: Choose the appropriate adjective that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance based on the descriptions below.
| EXCELLENT |
| GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
A. QUALITY OF SERVICES
1. Narrative: Address the Contractor’s ability to provide qualified personnel (including experienced managers and/or supervisors), necessary equipment which is properly maintained, quality control for the performance of your contract, and contractor’s compliance with contractual terms and conditions.
2. Rating for Quality of Services: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):
|_| Excellent |_|Good |_|Satisfactory |_|Marginal |_|Unsatisfactory
| B. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE: | ||
| 1. Narrative: Address the Contractor’s ability to meet the contract’s | specific response times and Contractor’s timeliness in providing any | administrative reports/documents required by your contract. |
2. Rating for Timeliness of Performance: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):
| C. BUSINESS RELATIONS | ||
| 1. Narrative: Address Contractor’s willingness to improve and correct | noncompliance issues and concerns. Describe Contractor’s ability to correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential problems in a timely manner. Does Contractor display initiative and flexibility? Do Contractor personnel promote a strong working relationship with your agency/organization? Are Contractor personnel courteous and | responsive? Do Contractor personnel interface effectively with your staff? |
2. Rating for Business Relations: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):
D. Identify the contractor’s overall strengths and weaknesses:
E. Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again?
YES |_| NO |_|
If no, please explain:
F. CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE RATING: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .