Attachment_B_Abstract_Instructions_and_Template.docx

DOCX document 42 KB Posted

Attached to
Strategic Technology Office-wide Innovation Solutions Opening Announcement
Solicitation number
DARPA-PS-26-09
Issued by

About this file

This document is an Abstract Instructions and Template for a DARPA Strategic Technology Office (STO) solicitation (DARPA-PS-26-09). The template mandates a structured 3-page abstract submission process for innovative research proposals, requiring specific sections including Goals and Impact, Technical Approach, Capabilities/Management Plan, and Bibliography. Submission must be in PDF or Microsoft Word format, with 1-inch margins, 12-point font, and cover details such as proposer organization, technical and administrative points of contact, and estimated total cost.

DARPA seeks revolutionary research ideas not addressed by existing programs, specifically excluding evolutionary improvements to current practices. Proposers are encouraged to review current STO programs and consult with program managers before submission. The solicitation uses procurement authorities under various U.S. Code sections to fund research and development through cooperative agreements, Other Transaction Agreements (OTAs), and experimental procurement mechanisms. While DARPA will provide feedback on abstracts within 30 calendar days, a favorable abstract response does not guarantee proposal selection, and all full proposals will be evaluated using published criteria.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment_C_Classified_Submission_Instructions.pdf PDF
DARPA-PS-26-09.pdf PDF
Attachment_A_Abstract_Summary_Slide_Template.pptx PPTX presentation

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DARPA-PS-26-09: Strategic Technology Office (STO) Office-wide

Abstract Instructions and Template

Use of this template is mandatory for all abstract submissions to this solicitation. Proposers must also include Attachment A (Abstract Summary Slide Template). This document must include all components described herein and must be submitted in PDF or Microsoft Word formats. All submissions must be written in English, and all pages shall be formatted for printing on 8-1/2 by 11-inch paper with 1-inch margins and font size no smaller than 12-point. Font sizes of 8 or 10-point may be used for figures, tables, and charts.

Abstracts shall not exceed a maximum of 3 pages. Abstracts should be at the UNCLASSIFIED or Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) level. All proprietary data and information should be appropriately marked.

Page limit includes:
Page limit does NOT include:
All figures, tables, charts
Cover Sheet

Table of Contents

Bibliography

Technical Papers (Optional, no more than 3)

Proposers are required to submit an abstract before submitting a full proposal. DARPA will respond to abstracts with a statement as to whether DARPA:

a. recommends the proposer submit a full proposal or,

b. does not recommend the proposer submit a full proposal with a rationale for this decision.

Regardless of DARPA’s response to an abstract, proposers may submit a full proposal. DARPA will review all conforming full proposals using the published evaluation criteria and without regard to any comments resulting from the review of an abstract. Proposers should note that a favorable response to an abstract is not a guarantee that a proposal based on the abstract will ultimately be selected for award negotiation. It is DARPA policy to attempt to reply to abstracts within thirty calendar days. These official notifications will be sent via email to the Technical POC and/or Administrative POC identified on the abstract cover sheet.

Abstracts must be submitted per the instructions outlined herein and received by DARPA no later than the due date and time listed in Part One: Overview Information. Abstracts received after this time and date may not be reviewed. Please visit Proposer Instructions and General Terms and Conditions for instructions on how to submit your abstract.

[PRIME ORGANIZATION LOGO]

Abstract Title

Proposer Organization

Technical Point of Contact (POC)
Name:

Mailing Address:

Telephone:

Email:

Administrative POC
Name:

Mailing Address:

Telephone:

Email:

Other Team Members (subcontractors and consultants), if known/applicable
Technical POC Name:

Organization:

Technical POC Name:

Organization:

Estimated Total Cost (Base + Options)
$

Estimated Period of Performance

Identify any other solicitation(s) to which this concept has been proposed.

Table of Contents

1.Goals and Impact4
2.Technical Approach4
3.Capabilities/Management Plan4
4.Bibliography4

DARPA-PS-26-09 Abstract Source Selection Sensitive

Goals and Impact [Describe what is being proposed and what difference it will make (qualitatively and quantitatively) if successful. Describe the innovative aspects of the project in the context of existing capabilities and approaches, clearly delineating the relationship of this work to any other projects from the past and present.] Technical Approach [Provide answers to the following questions:

· What is the proposed work attempting to accomplish or do?

· How is the work performed today (what is the state of the art or practice), and what are the limitations?

· What is new in your approach, and why do you think it will be successful?

· How would the DoW testing community implement the proposed approach/work?

· How much will it cost (rough order of magnitude), and how long will it take?

Outline and address technical challenges inherent in the approach and possible solutions for overcoming potential problems. Provide appropriate measurable milestones (quantitative if possible) at intermediate stages of the project to demonstrate progress and a plan for achieving the milestones.] Capabilities/Management Plan [Provide a brief summary of the expertise of the team, including subawardees and key personnel. While teaming arrangements do not need to be finalized at the time of abstract submission, mention of potential teaming/collaboration arrangements is highly encouraged. Identify a principal investigator for the project and include a description of the team’s organization, including roles and responsibilities.] Bibliography [Provide a brief (no more than 2 pages) bibliography with links to relevant papers, references, reports, etc.]

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .