ATTACHMENT A-C.docx

ATTACHMENT A WAGE DETERMINATION

“Descriptions for the occupations for this requirement and determine the appropriate wage determinations are the responsibility of the contractor, and offeror are encouraged to coordinate with Department of Labor to determine the appropriate job classifications for this requirement. The Agency assumes no responsibility or liability for a contractor’s determination of the appropriate classification.”

"REGISTER OF WAGE DETERMINATIONS UNDER | U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

THE SERVICE CONTRACT ACT | EMPLOYMENT STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION

By direction of the Secretary of Labor | WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION

| WASHINGTON D.C. 20210

| Wage Determination No.: 2015-4465 Daniel W. Simms Division of | Revision No.: 22 Director Wage Determinations| Date Of Last Revision: 08/07/2023

Note: Contracts subject to the Service Contract Act are generally required to pay at least the applicable minimum wage rate required under Executive Order 14026 or Executive Order 13658.

|If the contract is entered into on or |Executive Order 14026 generally applies to | |after January 30, 2022, or the |the contract. | |contract is renewed or extended (e.g., |The contractor must pay all covered workers | |an option is exercised) on or after |at least $16.20 per hour (or the applicable | |January 30, 2022: |wage rate listed on this wage determination,| | |if it is higher) for all hours spent | | |performing on the contract in 2023. | |If the contract was awarded on or |Executive Order 13658 generally applies to | |between January 1, 2015 and January 29,|the contract. | |2022, and the contract is not renewed |The contractor must pay all covered workers | |or extended on or after January 30, |at least $12.15 per hour (or the applicable | |2022: |wage rate listed on this wage determination,| | |if it is higher) for all hours spent | | |performing on the contract in 2023. |

The applicable Executive Order minimum wage rate will be adjusted annually. Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the Executive Orders is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

States: Georgia, South Carolina

Area: Georgia Counties of Burke, Columbia, Lincoln, McDuffie, Richmond South Carolina Counties of Aiken, Edgefield

Attachment B: RFQ# 36C24723Q0325 Past Performance Questionnaire

PAST PERFORMANCE

(To be completed by References)

Request for RFQ Number: 36C24723Q0325 closing date: February 8, 2024

Submit completed Cover Sheet and Survey via email to:

Gail Bargaineer, Contract Officer Network Contracting Office (NCO) 7 Phone: (404)3216111x205501 Email: gail.bargaineer2@va.gov Department of Veterans Affairs, *Do not return this form to the contractor being evaluated. It is desired that this form be submitted to the person identified above, before RFQ closing date.

1. Handwritten responses are acceptable. If a response is handwritten, please print legibly.

2. If more space is needed for narrative comments, use the back of the survey or attach additional pages.

3. Your time and effort in providing this vitally important information is greatly appreciated.

GENERAL INFORMATION

Please provide the following information:

Your Company Name:

Person Filling Out Survey Form:

Phone Number:

Fax Number:

Email Address:

Name of Company for which you are filling out this survey:

Contract Number(s): ___________________ Period of Performance: ___________________ General Description of Contract Services:

Contract Dollar Value: ______________ Type of Contract (firm fixed price, cost plus fixed fee, etc.): ______________

REMARKS: (Add on separate sheet.)

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY RATING SHEET

RATING SCALE

Please use the following rating to answer the questions. If you are unable to rate any item because it was not a requirement, never an issue, or you have no knowledge of the item in question, then you should mark “N/A”.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

NOTE: For statements indicating “No Confidence” or “Substantial Confidence”, please provide and explanation in the Comments section of the survey.

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY RATING SHEET

FOR CONTRACT: ___________________________

A. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE

(1) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship

(2) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.

(3) The Contractor utilized personnel who were appropriate to the effort performed.

B. COST CONTROL

(1) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.

(2) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

(3) The Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.

(4) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.

C. SCHEDULE

(1) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.

(2) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

D. BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS

(1) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

(2) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) and/or Technical Point of Contact (TPOC) were apprised of technical, cost and schedule issues.

(3) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise and businesslike manner

(4) The Contractor promptly notified the COR, TPOC and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.

(5) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.

(6) The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors.

(7) The Contractor demonstrated an effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program.

E. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

(1) The products/services provided adequately met the needs of the program.

(2) The Contractor was able to perform with minimal or no direction from the COR or TPOC.

(3) I am satisfied with the performance of the Contractor under this effort.

F. Key Personnel

(1) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance

(2) The Contractor proposed qualified personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract.

G. OTHER:

(1) Would you award this firm another contract? ( ) Yes ( ) No If you answered “no”, provide an explanation.

(2) Was the contract terminated for default? ( ) Yes ( X ) No

ATTACHMENT C Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)

FOR PRESSURE WASHING MAIN BLDG110, COURTYARDS (3) AND ATTACHED CANOPIES

Contract Number: Upon award, Government will enter contract number

Contract Description: Pressure Washing Main Hospital Building 110, Courtyards (3) and attached canopies

Contractor’s name:

1. PURPOSE

This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:

· What will be monitored.

· How monitoring will take place.

· Who will conduct the monitoring.

· How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.

This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.

This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.

*Note. The QASP is not a part of the contract. Its sole use is to monitor contractor performance.

2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.

a. Contracting Officer (CO) - The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.

Assigned CO: <Upon award, Government will enter name.> Organization or Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs, Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center

b. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) - The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf.

Assigned COR: Upon award, Government will enter name

c. Other Key Government Personnel - Upon award, Government will enter name, if applicable. This may include Performance Monitors, Clinical Quality experts, etc. who act on behalf of the COR to monitor performance

3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES

The following employees of the contractor serve as the contractor’s program manager for this contract.

a. Program Manager – Jessie Hutton or Designee

b. Other Contractor Personnel - Enter name(s) of the providers.

4. PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Performance measures are comprised of performance indicators (some characteristic of a deliverable that can be measured) and performance measures (a mark, measure or benchmark that government personnel use as a point of comparison when evaluating contractor performance). The Government performs surveillance to determine if the contractor exceeds, meets or does not meet these measures.

The Performance Requirements Summary Matrix, paragraph <enter number> in the Performance Work Statement (PWS), includes performance measures. The Government shall use these measures to determine contractor performance and shall compare contractor performance to the Acceptable Quality Level (AQL).

The Contractor shall provide the Charlie Norwood VA Healthcare Systems with their General Foreman’s, or other appropriate Point of Contact (POC), name and cell-phone number.

Para 6

The General Foreman or POC shall be with 4 hours after receiving call for meeting pertaining to facility exigency.

Para 6

Work under this contract shall include the furnishing of all labor, equipment, supplies, parts, tools, chemicals, water, transportation, and supervision.

Contractor shall comply with all local requirements regarding permitting and the containment of discharge into the storm drain system.

Para 6

Contractor shall Furnish and maintain any and all warning devices (i.e., barricades, cones, signs, lights, etc.) required to adequately protect the public, staff, and other workers during the performance of the work.

Para 6

Contractor will also be responsible for the cleaning out existing roof gutter system.

Contractor is responsible for completely removing from the property all debris generated from gutter cleaning Para 6

5. INCENTIVES AND DISINCENTIVES

There are no incentives or disincentives. The Government shall use the scoring methods above for continuing contract performance.

6. METHODS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE

Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR may use any surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.

a. DIRECT OBSERVATION: The COR can perform periodically or through 100% surveillance.

b. PERIODIC INSPECTION. The COR evaluates outcomes on a periodic basis. Inspections may be scheduled daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, or annually or use unscheduled inspections.

c. USER SURVEY: This method combines elements of validated user complaints and random sampling. Random survey is conducted to solicit user satisfaction. The COR may also generate inspections and sampling.

d. VALIDATED USER/CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS. This method relies on the patient to identify deficiencies. Complaints are then investigated and validated.

e.100% INSPECTION. The COR may evaluate all outcomes.

f. RANDOM SAMPLING. This is designed to evaluate performance by randomly selecting and inspecting a sample of cases.

g. Progress reports or status meetings. The COR will analyze contractor's progress reports. (Evaluate cost, schedule, etc.)

Metrics and methods are designed to determine if performance exceeds, meets, or does not meet a given standard and acceptable quality level. A rating scale shall be used to determine a positive, neutral or negative outcome. The following ratings shall be used: 100% is positive, 95% is neutral, and 90% is negative.

7. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE

a. ACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE (100% RATING)

The Government shall document positive performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action.

b. UNACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE (90% RATING)

When unacceptable performance occurs, the COR shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the COR shall document the discussion and place it in the COR file.

When the COR determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR) and present it to the contractor and a copy to the Contracting Officer.

Any CDRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer.