Attachment 9 - Evaluation Factor Tables.pdf

Custodial Services Solicitatio#: FA483022Q0007 Attachment 9

List of Evaluation Tables:

Table 1: Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Table 2: Relevancy Definitions

Assessment Area

Very Relevant

Relevant Somewhat Relevant

Not Relevant

Scope / Complexity

Responsible for Base Custodial services which contains at least a 25,000 square foot Child Development Center, a 25,000 square foot Youth/School Age Center, a 40,000 Gymnasium and 150 facilities to be cleaned according to the tasks required by the Moody AFB Performance Work Statement, performed as a Prime Contractor

Responsible for Custodial services which contains at least a 20,000 square foot Child Development Center, a 20,000 square foot Youth/School Age Center, a 40,000 Gymnasium and 130 facilities to be cleaned which is somewhat less than the Moody AFB Performance Work Statement, performed as a Prime Contractor or Subcontractor.

Responsible for Custodial services which contains at least a 15,000 square foot Child Development Center, a 15,000 square foot Youth/School Age Center, a 30,000 Gymnasium and 100 facilities to be cleaned which is significantly less than Moody AFB Performance Work Statement, performed as a Prime Contractor or Subcontractor.

All Others

Magnitude

Performed as a Prime Contractor on contracts/task orders on currently or consecutively with a combined value of at least $4M.

Performed on contracts/task orders concurrently or consecutively with a combined value of at least $3M.

Performed on contracts/task orders concurrently or consecutively with a combined value of at least $2M.

Contract Type

Performance under Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) contract.

Performance under a FFP task order or purchase order.

Performance under a Cost Reimbursable contract or any other contractual arrangement.

Contract Environment

Contract performance on an Air Force Base or Air Force Reserve Base within the United States.

Contract performance on a DoD installation within the United States.

Contract performance at a Federal, State, County, or City facility within the United States.

Table 3: Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Rating Definition

Very Relevant Present/Past Performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant

Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Table 4: Past and Present Performance Questionnaire Ratings

E Exceptional

G Good

S Satisfactory

M Marginal

U Unsatisfactory

N Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeded many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeded some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for

Performance meets contractual requirements.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

Table 5: Performance Confidence Assessments

Rating Description

Substantial Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral)

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

satisfactory. proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.