Attachment 6 Past Performance Questionnaire Final.docx
DOCX document 36 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA500022Q0038
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire for a firm competing for a hangar door inspection and maintenance services contract with the Department of the Air Force Pacific Air Forces. The contractor must provide inspection, routine repair, emergency services, and maintenance for hangar doors and associated systems at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska, complying with manufacturer specifications and applicable federal, state, and local requirements. The questionnaire requests information about the contractor's previous relevant contracts over the past five years, and evaluates the contractor's performance on factors such as maintaining standards, responding to issues, staffing, scheduling, and customer service. Responses to the completed questionnaire are due by August 22, 2022.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.
RFQ FA500022Q0038
Attachment 6 Past Performance Questionnaire SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO: ________________________
__________________________is currently participating as a respondent to the Government’s Request for Quotation No. FA500022Q0038 for Hangar Door Inspections and Maintenance services at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. We anticipate awarding a firm-fixed-price contract.
The Government will be selecting Contractors for this project based on selection factors. One of the key factors in the Government’s final decision is past performance. To assist the Government in its assessment of Contractor past performance, we are required to identify previous projects and clients who are familiar with our past work. For the purposes of this questionnaire, past work is defined as contracts performed and/or being performing for any customer within the last five (5) years from the issuance day of the solicitation 22 July 2022.
As one of our customers for past contracting work on __________________________________, we are requesting that you complete the attached questionnaire regarding our past performance. This letter also authorizes you to discuss our past performance with the Government and to release information regarding our past performance to the Government.
Your prompt attention in completing the attached questionnaire will ensure we receive full consideration in this competition. Please return the completed form to the Government point of contacts (POCs) identified below, response is required no later than 1:00 P.M. Alaska Daylight Time (AKDT) on Monday, August 22, 2022.
Government POCs Stephen Hulsey – stephen.hulsey@us.af.mil Viola Stepetin – viola.stepetin@us.af.mil
Thank you for your assistance.
(Signature and title of individual with the authority to sign for and legally bind the Contractor)
Attachment : Past Performance Questionnaire
Section 1: Contract Identification
A. Contractor (Company/Division):
B. Contractor Cage Code:
C. Contract Number:
D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):
E. Program Title:
F. Brief Description of Services Performed:
G. Period of Performance:
H. Contract Dollar Value:
I. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor
Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification
A. Customer or agency name:
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):
Section 3: Respondent Identification
A. Respondent’s name:
B. Respondent’s title:
C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:
D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:
E. Other suggested points of contact:
Section 4: Performance Information
| Scope of Work |
| Yes |
| No |
1. Does your contract include the inspection of Hangar doors?
2. Does your contract include the maintenance of Hangar Doors?
3. Does your contract include emergency services for Hangar doors?
4. Does your contract include the inspection and maintenance of various types of Hangar Doors to include but not limited to:
MEGA Doors 1990-1998, McKee 2012, Premier 2008-2010
In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:
| RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| O |
| Outstanding |
| During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or did meet) all contract requirements and is exceeding (or did exceed) some, if not all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action. |
| S |
| Satisfactory |
| During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or did meet) contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action. |
| U |
| Unacceptable |
| During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) contract requirements. For any problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required. |
| N/A |
| Not Applicable |
| Used if the rating(s) are not going to be applied to a particular area for evaluation. |
| Contractor Performance: |
| O |
| S |
| U |
| N/A |
1. How would you rate the Contractor’s ability to maintain standards outlined in your Performance Work Statement, Statement of Work, or equivalent requirements documents?
2. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to proactively respond, recognize, resolve unanticipated difficulties, correct deficiencies, re‐performance, or emergencies in the manner consistent with the contract’s quality control procedure?
3. How well did the contractor provide for sufficient and qualified manpower in the performance of this contract?
4. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to remain on schedule, meet specific response times, and scheduled time frames for completion of specific tasks while still providing quality service?
5. How would you rate the Contractor’s customer service?
6. Would you hire this Contractor again? If not, please explain.
[click and pick the date]
Respondent’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
Stephen Hulsey – stephen.hulsey@us.af.mil Viola Stepetin – viola.stepetin@us.af.mil
Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Page 4 of 4
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .