Attachment 6 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 55 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NIST Cybersecurity and Privacy Support Services (CAPSS) - Pre-Solicitation Notice Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 1333ND23QNB770030
About this file
This document provides a draft solicitation for the NIST Cybersecurity and Privacy Support Services (CAPSS) Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) multiple award contract. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) intends to issue a solicitation in FY2023 seeking proposals for IDIQ contracts to provide cybersecurity and privacy support services. The solicitation is anticipated to be set aside for small businesses with a NAICS code of 541519 and size standard of $30 million. Offerors will be required to respond to the IDIQ performance work statement as well as five sample task order statements for evaluation. NIST intends to award multiple IDIQ contracts to the offerors representing the best value and reserves the right to award one or more of the sample task orders. Interested parties are requested to submit any questions on the draft solicitation by January 13, 2023 for consideration in the final solicitation to be released on SAM.gov at a later date.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 8 - Responses to Questions.pdf | ||
| Attachment 8 - Questions Submission Worksheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Draft Sol 1333ND23QNB770030-CAPSS Final 12.13.22.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Mock TO2 PWS - Software Development.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Mock TO1 PWS - Standards Support.pdf | ||
| Attachment 7 - IDIQ Labor Rates Spreadsheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 4 - Mock TO4 PWS- Crypto Validation Support.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Mock TO3 PWS - NICE.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - Mock TO5 PWS - Supply Chain Interdependencies.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE
Instructions:
References are asked to complete all items set forth in this Questionnaire and should return the completed and signed form electronically to the Requester and not the Contractor being evaluated.
Background Information
Name of Contractor being evaluated:
Name of Respondent, Position, and Title
Signature + Date of Respondent
Agency/Employer name:
Respondent’s Contact information:
Telephone: Fax: e-mail:
Referenced Contract/Order Number for which information is being provided:
Period of performance for referenced contract/order:
Contract/order award date:
Contract/order amount (including options exercised):
Contract type: Fixed-Price Cost Plus Incentive Fee
Labor-Hour/T&M
Cost Plus Award Fee
Cost Plus Fixed Fee
Other (Please provide Contract Type)
Was the Contractor for which this reference is being provided the Prime Contractor?
Yes No
Description of the contract/order work:
Names of key Contractor personnel (if applicable):
Evaluation
For each performance element identified below, references should evaluate performance of the firm or individual identified above in this form. Where the reference lacks sufficient information to provide an evaluation for a particular performance element, this should be noted. Where any deficiency or unfavorable information is identified, the reference should identify any mitigating factors that may weigh in favor of the person/firm on whose behalf the reference is provided (i.e., problems due to causes outside the contractor’s control). An individual within your organization who is knowledgeable of the Contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall performance should complete this questionnaire. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge of the Contractor’s performance with the judgment of others within their organization, as applicable.
Date this questionnaire was completed:
Evaluation of Past Performance
Please provide answers to the questions listed below. When responding to the questions listed, circle the letter that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation (see the “ratings” chart below for a description of each letter). For any Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating, please provide explanatory narratives in the “Remarks” section at the bottom of this questionnaire. These remarks need not be lengthy, just detailed. If more space is required, attach additional pages. Handwritten responses to this questionnaire are acceptable. However, if responses are handwritten, please print legibly.
Definitions of Potential Ratings for Questions Below:
Adjective Description Excellent (E) Possessing outstanding quality or merit, remarkably good.
Good (G) Possessing more than satisfactory quality or merit.
Satisfactory (S) Possessing adequate quality or merit.
Marginal (M) Possessing limited quality or merit.
Unsatisfactory (U) Possessing inadequate quality or merit.
Not Applicable (N/A)
Reference has no knowledge of Contractor’s past performance in this area, reference has insufficient information to provide a rating in this area, or question does not apply to the referenced contract.
1) QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE
Contractor’s ability to meet minimum quality requirements specified in contract
Contractor’s ability to effectively control the quality of products or services provided
2) DAY TO DAY MANAGEMENT
Contractor’s ability to manage its financial and human resources to meet contract requirements
Contractor’s ability to recruit qualified personnel within a reasonable period of time
Contractor’s ability to effectively manage the contract/order from a contract administration standpoint
Contractor’s professionalism and business acumen
3) STAFF RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION
Contractor’s ability to provide and retain quality staff to within reasonable levels of turnover
4) TIMELINESS
Contractor’s ability to timely meet requirements for contract deliverables
Contractor’s ability to mitigate schedule risk when unanticipated events occur
5) COST CONTROL
Contractor’s ability to manage its resources within cost limitations set forth in the contract
Contractor’s ability to adequately and accurately track and report costs as required by the contract
OVERALL RATING:
Remarks
| PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE |
| Definitions of Potential Ratings for Questions Below: |
| Name of Contractor being evaluated: |
| Name of Respondent Position and Title: |
| AgencyEmployer name: |
| Telephone: |
| Fax: |
| email: |
| Referenced ContractOrder Number for which information is being provided: |
| Period of performance for referenced contractorder: |
| Contractorder award date: |
| Contractorder amount including options exercised: |
| Contract typeRow1: |
| Description of the contractorder work: |
| Names of key Contractor personnel if applicable: |
| Date this questionnaire was completed: |
| Check Box16: Off |
| Check Box17: Off |
| Check Box18: Off |
| Check Box19: Off |
| Check Box20: Off |
| Check Box21: Off |
| Check Box22: Off |
| Check Box23: Off |
| List Box25: [E] |
| List Box26: [E] |
| List Box27: [E] |
| List Box28: [E] |
| List Box29: [E] |
| List Box30: [E] |
| List Box31: [E] |
| List Box32: [E] |
| List Box33: [E] |
| List Box34: [E] |
| List Box35: [E] |
| List Box36: [E] |
| Text37: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .