ATTACHMENT 5 - QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP).docx
DOCX document 31 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C25620Q0794
About this file
This document contains a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for landscaping services at the Gulf Coast Veterans Health Care System campus in Biloxi, Mississippi. The QASP outlines five key performance standards for landscaping tasks including maintaining grass, plants, trees, and landscape beds to acceptable quality levels. It establishes methods for monitoring contractor performance through direct observation, inspections, surveys, and validated complaints. The plan provides metrics to determine whether performance exceeds, meets, or fails to meet standards. The related federal contract opportunity seeks landscaping services for the Biloxi campus with a solicitation number of 36C25620Q0794 set aside for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses. The requirement is issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs Network Contracting Office 16. Interested parties must register in SAM, VetBiz, and Vet 4212 systems to be considered for award.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 5 – QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN
36C25619Q0794
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN
For: Landscaping Services, Biloxi, Mississippi
Contract Number: TBD
Contract Description: Landscaping Services, Biloxi, MS campus
Contractor’s name: TBD
Period of Performance: October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2025 (Base plus four (4) - twelve (12) month option periods. Options to be exercised at the Government’s discretion)
1. PURPOSE
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:
· What will be monitored.
· How monitoring will take place.
· Who will conduct the monitoring.
· How monitoring efforts and results will be documented.
This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance.
This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.
2. GOVERNMENT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.
a. Contracting Officer (CO) - The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.
Assigned CO: Beth Cook Organization or Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs, Network Contract Office 16
b. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) - The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf.
Assigned COR: William Roberts
c. Other Key Government Personnel – TBD
3. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVES
The following employees of the contractor serve as the contractor’s program manager for this contract.
a. Program Manager – TBD
b. Other Contractor Personnel – TBD
4. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine if the contractor exceeds, meets or does not meet these standards.
Performance Requirements Summary Matrix:
The Government will use these standards to determine contractor performance and shall compare contractor performance to the Acceptable Quality Level (AQL).
| Task |
| ID |
| Indicator |
| Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level |
| Method of Surveillance |
| Incentive |
| General |
| 1 |
| Maintain ravine and areas A-1 through A-4 |
(PWS 1.3.1)
Grass is maintained within proper height for its area. Sod does not need to be replaced. Sod is healthy and looks well maintained
| Customer complaints shall not exceed 3 per month. |
| Weekly Inspection |
| Positive Past Performance & Exercise of Option Period |
| 2 |
| Maintain Shrubs, ornamentals trees, Broadleaf Evergreens, Hedges, and Perennial Flowers |
Located in Beds only (PWS 1.1.4 and 1.5.1) Plants, ornamental trees, hedges, bushes, flowers all flourish and do not need to be replaced. They have adequate drainage and mulch. They do not show any sign of disease or pests and appear healthy. They are pruned properly and in a timely manner. Ornamental trees, bushes, and hedges are all trimmed as such that no limb is actually in contact with exterior of building. They are trimmed properly. Bedding is mulched and free of weeds, fallen leaves, grass, litter and debris. Fertilizer and soil amendments are applied. Soil is aerated;
| Customer complaints shall not exceed 2 per month. |
| Monthly Inspection |
Positive Past Performance & Exercise of Option Period
| 3 |
| Landscape beds have well defined maintained edge and are trimmed (PWS 1.1.4) |
| The landscape beds have a well-defined edge and are trimmed. The border along bed perimeter is not in need of trimming. Natural earthen type bed borders have a well-defined edge and do not need to be re-edged.. |
| Customer complaints shall not exceed 2 per month. |
| Weekly Inspection |
| Positive Past Performance & Exercise of Option Period |
| 4 |
| Maintain landscape beds mulching |
(PWS 1.1.4
| The landscape beds have adequate mulch of minimum 2.5 inches in depth and do not require to be re-mulched or re-freshed |
| Customer complaints shall not exceed 2 per month. |
| Weekly Inspection |
| Positive Past Performance & Exercise of Option Period |
| 5 |
| Inspect Beds and ravine area, A-1 thru A-4 for any trash, litter, debris, limbs and weeds and undergrowth |
| Landscape beds and ravine area and areas A-1 thru A-4 are free of trash, debris, fallen limbs and litter. |
| Customer complaints shall not exceed 3 per month. |
| Weekly Inspection |
| Positive Past Performance & Exercise of Option Period |
5. INCENTIVES
The Government shall use Exercise of Option Period and Past Performance as incentives. Incentives shall be based on exceeding, meeting, or not meeting performance standards.
6. METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE
Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.
a. DIRECT OBSERVATION. (Can be performed periodically or through 100% surveillance.)
Performance Standard(s) ID: 1,2,3,4,5
b. PERIODIC INSPECTION. (Evaluates outcomes on a periodic basis. Inspections may be scheduled [Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, or annually] or unscheduled, as required.)
Performance Standard (s) ID: 1,2,3,4,5
c. USER SURVEY. (Combines elements of validated user complaints and random sampling. Random survey is conducted to solicit user satisfaction. May also generate inspections and sampling.)
Performance Standard(s) ID: N/A
d. VALIDATED USER/CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS. (Relies on the patient to identify deficiencies. Complaints are then investigated and validated.)
Performance Standard(s) ID: N/A
e. 100% INSPECTION. (Evaluates all outcomes.)
Performance Standard(s) ID: 1,2,3,4,5
f. PERIODIC SAMPLING. (Variation of random sampling. However, sample is only taken when a problem/deficiency is suspected. Sample results are applicable only for the specific work inspected. Since sample is not entirely random, it cannot be applied to total activity performance.)
Performance Standard(s) ID: N/A
g. RANDOM SAMPLING. (Designed to evaluate performance by randomly selecting and inspecting a sample of cases.
Performance Standard(s) ID: N/A
h. Progress or status meetings.
Performance Standard(s) ID: N/A
i. Analysis of contractor's progress reports. (Evaluate cost, schedule, etc.)
Performance Standard(s) ID: 1,2,3,4,5
7. RATINGS
Metrics and methods are designed to determine if performance exceeds, meets, or does not meet a given standard and acceptable quality level. A rating scale shall be used to determine a positive, neutral, or negative outcome. The following ratings shall be used:
Excellent (“E”) = Exceeds Standards Satisfactory (“S”) = Meets Standards Unsatisfactory (“U”) = Fails To Meet Standards
8. DOCUMENTING PERFORMANCE
a. ACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE
The Government shall document positive performance. Any report may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action.
b. UNACCEPTABLE PERFORMANCE
When unacceptable performance occurs, the COR shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the COR shall document the discussion and place it in the COR file.
When the COR determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR), and present it to the contractor's program manager.
The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CDR in writing. The CDR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CDR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the COR. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability.
Any CDRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for any contractual action deemed necessary by the CO.
9. FREQUENCY OF MEASUREMENT
a. Frequency of Measurement.
During contract performance, the COR will periodically analyze whether the negotiated frequency of surveillance is appropriate for the work being performed.
b. Frequency of Performance Assessment Meetings.
The COR shall meet with the contractor quarterly or as needed to assess performance and shall provide a written assessment.
Contract Discrepancy Report
| Contract No. |
| Report No. for this Discrepancy: |
Contractor/Manager’s Name:
From: (Name of Project Officer)
Dates
Prepared:
Returned by Contractor:
Action Complete:
Discrepancy or Problem:
Signature of Contracting Officer:
To: (Contracting Officer)
From: (Contractor)
Contractor Response as to Cause, Corrective Action and Actions to Prevent Recurrence (Attach Continuation Sheet if Necessary)
Signature of Contractor Representative:
Date:
Government Evaluation:
Government Actions:
Close Out
| Name |
| Title |
| Signature |
| Date |
Contractor Notified
Project Officer
Contracting Officer
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .