ATTACHMENT_5-_PAST_PERFORMANCE_SURVEY.docx
DOCX document 22 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 140L6224Q0027
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Survey template for Bureau of Land Management Wyoming to gather information on a contractor's past performance for paper shredding services. The survey requests details on the contractor's overall performance, quality and reliability of services, customer satisfaction, equipment, problem resolution, schedule, and small business subcontracting plan compliance. The survey asks the evaluator to provide ratings and narrative explanations for each performance area. The completed surveys should be returned to the Contracting Specialist by May 24, 2024.
The related federal contract opportunity is for the Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Wyoming Region to conduct stand exams on woodland survey units to describe vegetation characteristics in the Muddy Creek Focal Area. This is a firm fixed price contract with a period of performance from August 15, 2024 to August 15, 2026. The total set-aside is for small businesses under NAICS code 115310, with a size standard of $11.5 million. The contract will be awarded based on a best value trade-off analysis.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Juniper_Inventory_Key_0002_0002.pdf | ||
| Juniper_Priority_4_0002_0002.pdf | ||
| Juniper_Priority_3_0002_0002.pdf | ||
| Q_A_-_0002_0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| Bid_Schedule_0002_0002.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Juniper_Priority_2_0002_0002.pdf | ||
| Sol_140L6224Q0027_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| Juniper_Priority_1_0002_0002.pdf | ||
| Q_A_Attachment_0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sol_140L6224Q0027_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140L6224Q0027.pdf | ||
| Juniper_Priority_2.pdf | ||
| Juniper_Priority_1.pdf | ||
| Bid_Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Juniper_Inventory_Key.pdf | ||
| Wage_Determination-_Carbon_County_WY.pdf | ||
| Juniper_Priority_3.pdf | ||
| Juniper_Priority_4.pdf | ||
| Juniper_Inventory_Vicinity.pdf | ||
| A04-_Juniper_Woodland_Inventory_SOW_Edited.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 2:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT WYOMING
Past Performance Survey for Paper Shredding Services
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE
The evaluation will use the following rating system:
1. The attached questionnaire shall be utilized in the evaluation process of each past performance evaluation. After each factor has been rated in a particular section the evaluator will assign an overall risk rating to the section. The following criteria shall be considered when rating each part of the questionnaire:
Exceptional (E) Performance meets all or exceeds many of the contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good (VG) Performance meets all or exceeds some of the contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory (S) Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal (M) Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective.
Unsatisfactory (U) Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Unknown (N/A) Did not observe performance in this area.
2. Please respond to the following questions regarding the contractor’s past performance. For all ratings, please provide a narrative explaining how the contractor either exceeded your requirement or how the contractor failed to meet your requirement. If the contractor had problems in a specific area, but you determined them not to have had an impact to the mission, please state such in your narrative remarks.
Identification
a. Contractor’s Name: ________________________________________
b. Contract Number: _________________________________________
c. Program Title: _____________________________________________
| d. | Contract Type: | Firm Fixed Price____ | |
| Fixed Price Incentive____ | |||
| Cost Plus Award Fee____ | |||
| Cost Plus Incentive Fee____ | |||
| Other ____ |
e. Period of Performance: ______________________________________
f. Total Contract Dollar Value (as of this date): _____________________
g. Total Number of Contractor Personnel (as of this date): ____________
h. Brief Description of Contracted Item(s) or Service(s):
2. Please respond to the following questions regarding the contractor’s past performance. For all ratings, please provide a narrative explaining how the contractor either exceeded your requirement or how the contractor failed to meet your requirement. If the contractor had problems in a specific area, but you determined them to have not had an impact to the mission, please state as such in your narrative remarks.
a. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance in terms of quality, timeliness, professionalism, and courtesy?
| |_|Exceptional |
| |_|Very Good |
| |_|Satisfactory |
| |_|Marginal |
| |_|Unsatisfactory |
| |_|Unknown |
Narrative:
b. How would you rate the overall quality and reliability of the service performed by the contractor?
| |_|Exceptional |
| |_|Very Good |
| |_|Satisfactory |
| |_|Marginal |
| |_|Unsatisfactory |
| |_|Unknown |
Narrative:
c. How would you rate the offeror’s emphasis on customer satisfaction?
| |_|Exceptional |
| |_|Very Good |
| |_|Satisfactory |
| |_|Marginal |
| |_|Unsatisfactory |
| |_|Unknown |
Narrative:
d. How would you rate the contractor’s equipment used for service provided?
| |_|Exceptional |
| |_|Very Good |
| |_|Satisfactory |
| |_|Marginal |
| |_|Unsatisfactory |
| |_|Unknown |
Narrative:
e. Please rate the contractor’s effectiveness in managing and resolving problems.
| |_|Exceptional |
| |_|Very Good |
| |_|Satisfactory |
| |_|Marginal |
| |_|Unsatisfactory |
| |_|Unknown |
Narrative:
f. Please rate the contractor’s overall compliance with the contract terms and conditions.
| |_|Exceptional |
| |_|Very Good |
| |_|Satisfactory |
| |_|Marginal |
| |_|Unsatisfactory |
| |_|Unknown |
Narrative:
g. Delivery Schedule: How well did the contractor meet required schedule?
| |_|Exceptional |
| |_|Very Good |
| |_|Satisfactory |
| |_|Marginal |
| |_|Unsatisfactory |
| |_|Unknown |
Narrative:
h. How well did the contractor plan for and execute quality control?
| |_|Exceptional |
| |_|Very Good |
| |_|Satisfactory |
| |_|Marginal |
| |_|Unsatisfactory |
| |_|Unknown |
Narrative:
i. How effective was the contractor in identifying and resolving problem areas?
| |_|Exceptional |
| |_|Very Good |
| |_|Satisfactory |
| |_|Marginal |
| |_|Unsatisfactory |
| |_|Unknown |
Narrative:
j. How effective is the contractor’s local management team and were they effective in hiring qualified and experienced employees?
| |_|Exceptional |
| |_|Very Good |
| |_|Satisfactory |
| |_|Marginal |
| |_|Unsatisfactory |
| |_|Unknown |
Narrative:
k. If applicable, did the contractor effectively manage the Small Business subcontracting plan?
| |_| Yes (please explain) | |
| |_| No (please explain) |
Narrative:
l. If applicable, did the contractor successfully meet established Small Business subcontracting plan goals?
| |_| Yes (please explain) | |
| |_| No (please explain) |
Narrative:
| m. If Small Business subcontracting goals were not met, did the contractor demonstrate a good faith effort to meet the projected goals as identified in the approved plan | |_| Yes (please explain) | |
| |_| No (please explain) |
Narrative:
n. Based on your judgment of the contractor’s performance; would you award the contractor another service contract?
|_| Yes (please explain) |_| No (please explain) Narrative:
o. What were the contractor's strong points, if any, and what did you like best about their performance?
Narrative:
p. What were the contractor's weak points, if any, and what did you like least about their performance?
Narrative:
q. Please rate overall customer satisfaction with the contractor's performance.
| |_|Exceptional |
| |_|Very Good |
| |_|Satisfactory |
| |_|Marginal |
| |_|Unsatisfactory |
| |_|Unknown |
Narrative:
3. The following information will help us track the responses received, as well as resolve whatever differences may arise between your perception of the contractor’s performance and the contractor’s perception of their performance.
a. Evaluator’s Name:
b. Title:
c. Telephone Number:
d. Organization, Office Symbol, and Address:
e. Length of involvement in the contract:
f. Date of questionnaire completion:
4. Again, thank you for your time and effort in assisting us with our requirement.
5. Please provide narrative explanations for each answer. If more space is needed, please use the back of this questionnaire, or attach additional sheets of paper. Please identify the performance area if additional information is provided.
6. You are urged to supplement your knowledge of the contractor’s performance with the judgment of others in your organization. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire Shredding Services we solicit your comments on other similar programs for which your organization has contracts with this contractor.
7. Please return the completed questionnaire to Bureau of Land Management, Attn: Heather Skalet, by email to hskalet@blm.gov. Not to arrive later than 2:00 PM MT May 24, 2024.
Heather Skalet Contracting Specialist
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .