Attachment 5 - OEC E-Feeds DRAFT RFP Vendor Evaluation Criteria.pdf

PDF 163 KB Posted

Attached to
DRAFT RFP Automated Financial Institutions and Providers Data Feed Products and Services (eFeeds)
Solicitation number
DRAFT50310223EFEEDS
Issued by

About this file

This draft request for proposal from the Securities and Exchange Commission seeks electronic data feeds services to provide automated financial institution and provider data to SEC employees. The SEC is seeking feedback on a draft statement of objectives and evaluation criteria as part of market research, with the intention to potentially issue a solicitation in September 2024 for a one year contract with four one-year option periods. Responses to the SEC's questions on the draft are requested by April 8, 2024 to help formulate a final solicitation. The draft evaluation criteria include considerations around risk, security and privacy; total cost of ownership; existing broker data feed relationships; training and support availability; and technical capability.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

OEC E-Feeds DRAFT RFP Vendor Evaluation Criteria

1. Risk, Security and Privacy Assessment.

a. The Government will evaluate the offerors 3rd Party Assessment of the security controls and determine the best possibility of obtaining FedRAMP authorization.

b. The Government will also provide a security questionnaire that must be returned with the RFP package for the offeror to be evaluated.

2. Total Cost of Ownership

a. The Government will evaluate the total cost of ownership to account for the offerors annual cost including initial setup, configurations, on-going costs, and FedRAMP costs.

3. Existing Broker Data Feeds

a. Number of brokers that the offeror has existing relationships with.

b. The SEC has identified 11 brokers that encompasses a significant portion of the accounts held by SEC employees.

4. Training and ongoing support availability.

a. Training plan and methods for users and administrators.

b. Help desk availability, inclusive of technical support.

c. Readily available documentation for users to learn the application.

5. Technical Capability

a. The Government will review the offerors performance work statement (PWS) and

Service Level Agreements (SLAs) to determine the offerors understanding of the Government’s requirements and the likelihood that their approach will result in successful performance.

Attachment 5: OEC E-Feeds DRAFT RFP Vendor Evaluation Criteria

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .