Attachment 4_RFI_Waterfront Operations.docx

DOCX document 21 KB Posted

Attached to
Waterfront Operations, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division (NSWCCD)
Solicitation number
N00167-25-R-00XX
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Market Research Questionnaire for a Waterfront Operations contract opportunity with the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division (NSWCCD). The government seeks contractor support for services including transition, program management, operations management, reporting, safety compliance, small watercraft operation, industrial maintenance and repair, and Research and Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) project support. The anticipated contract is a cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF), single award indefinite delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract with an unrestricted procurement under NAICS Code 488390, with a $47 million small business size standard.

The questionnaire is designed to gather market intelligence from potential contractors, exploring their interest, experience, socio-economic status, personnel capabilities, and insights on the draft Statement of Work. Key procurement details include a five-year ordering period beginning on or before June 1, 2026, with solicitation release expected by June 2025. The current services are administered by Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. Interested parties are requested to complete the attached market research questionnaire and draft SOW question sheet, with responses to be submitted electronically to the contracting points of contact, Caroline Lira and Mike Rossik from the Department of the Navy Naval Sea Systems Command.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attach. 3_Waterfront L+M_DRAFT.docx DOCX document
Attach. 1_N0016725R00XX_Draft SOW.docx DOCX document
Attach. 2_SOW Question Sheet.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

NSWCCD MARKET RESEARCH QUESTIONNAIRE

WATERFRONT OPERATIONS

Firm:

Address:

CAGE Code:

Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) number:

Firm point of contact (POC):

POC title:

POC email address and phone #:

The following questions are designed to help the Government make a determination related to socioeconomic / small business opportunities as well as refine/improve current acquisition documents such as the SOW and solicitation.

Company Info / Experience
Contractor

Response

Does your firm intend to propose on the current requirement?
|_| Yes |_| No
Have you provided similar support services in the past; for either Government or private industry clients? If yes, provide the following information for up to 3 recent contracts.
|_| Yes |_| No
3
Contract Number (w/Task Order # as appropriate):

Client POC with email address:

% work self-performed:

4
Contract Number (w/Task Order # as appropriate):
5
Contract Number (w/Task Order # as appropriate):
Please identify your company’s socio-economic small business size status or indicate if your company is a large business.
|_| 8(a) |_| SDB

|_| WOSB |_| VOSB

|_| SDVOSB |_| HUBZone |_| Large Business |_| Other:_________

If you have not performed at least 50% of a similar support services contract in the past, how can you demonstrate you are capable of meeting the requirements of FAR 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting?
|_| Yes |_| No
Does your firm already employ personnel with the required secret clearances? If not, how do you intend to meet this SOW requirement?
|_| Yes |_| No

If no, explain: __________________

Does your firm have a secret facility clearance (FCL)?

If not, how do you intend to meet this solicitation requirement?

|_| Yes |_| No If no, explain: ___________________

Acquisition Strategy
Contractor

Response

The SOW is clear and would allow me to propose an appropriate level of effort. If no, which portions are unclear and/or underdeveloped?

Portions of the SOW are suitable for firm fixed pricing? If yes, which portions do you believe are suitable for FFP?

3
Comparing the SOW to other Government / Department of Defense solicitations, the NSWCCD SOW appears comprehensive and finely tuned. If you disagree, please provide suggestions for improvement (additions, deletions, clarifications, etc.)
4
The requested Key Personnel are sufficient (not too many and not too few) to determine the team representing the best value to the Government. If you disagree, please provide suggestions.
5
Our firm is comfortable with meeting the experience requirements as specified and/or proposing experience and clearly documenting its equivalency.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .