Attachment_4_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 341 KB Posted
- Attached to
- INSTALL PILINGS & DOCK AT HI MARINA, CALO
- Solicitation number
- 140P5324R0032
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity, Solicitation Number 140P5324R0032, for the Installation of Pilings and Docks located at Cape Lookout National Seashore (CALO).
The questionnaire requests the recipient to provide an assessment of the offeror's past performance on a current or historical contract. The assessment covers the offeror's ability to meet requirements, provide timely products, and perform quality work. Respondents are asked to rate the offeror as Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory for each evaluation factor, and provide supporting comments. The completed questionnaire is to be submitted directly to the offeror by 5:00 PM EST on May 29, 2024 from a corporate or government email account. An alternate point of contact is also requested in case the original respondent is unavailable.
The related federal contract opportunity is for the Installation of Pilings and Dock at Hi Marina, CALO, issued by the Department of the Interior National Park Service Southeast Region. No additional details about the contract opportunity are provided in the document.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation# 140P5324R0032
Please Complete this Questionnaire and Include with your Offer
We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, Interior Region 2 – South Contracting Office, Solicitation Number: 140P5324R0032 for the Installation of Pilings and Docks located at Cape Lookout National Seashore (CALO) As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Please Complete this Questionnaire and E-mail to the sender (Contractor). They will include this evaluation with their proposal in response to the solicitation.
This Questionnaire is due to the sender no later than 5:00 PM EST on 29 May 2024. The Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the sender from a corporate or government email account.
If you will not be available for verification (if necessary) of this past performance evaluation, please indicate another point of contact (POC) for the Contract Specialist to contact.
Alternate POC name: ________________________________________
Alternate POC Phone Number: ________________________________________
Alternate POC E-mail Address: ________________________________________
Thank you.
NAME OF OFFEROR: ________________________________________________________________________
Phone: ________________________ Fax: _____________________________
E-Mail: ___________________________________________________________
I. CURRENT OR HISTORICAL CONTRACT INFORMATION
CONTRACT REFERENCED
1. Contract or Identifying Number: ______________________________________________________________
2. Contract Value: ___________________________________________________________________________
3. Period of Performance: _____________________________________________________________________
4. Brief description of items provided: ___________________________________________________________
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________
Agency/Company: ____________________________________________________________________________
Title: ________________________________________ Phone: _______________________________________
E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________________________
II. EVALUATION. PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR UTILIZING THE GUIDE BELOW.
EXPLANATORY NARRATIVES FOR AS MANY RESPONSES AS POSSIBLE WOULD BE
APPRECIATED. THESE NARRATIVES NEED NOT BE LENGTHY, JUST DETAILED. ATTACH
ADDITIONAL PAGES IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED.
Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
VERY GOOD
Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
MARGINAL
Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
NOT APPLICABLE
(N/A)
Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
QUESTION 1: PERFORMANCE
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A
Performance
Comments, if any.
QUESTIONS 2 AND 3: TIMELINESS
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems
QUESTION 4: QUALITY OF WORK
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of tasks and the overall quality of the work?
Quality of Shipments
Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
General Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .