Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 164 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Custodial Services FY26
- Solicitation number
- F3G3CE5230A001
About this file
The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for FY26 Nellis Custodial Services contract at Nellis Air Force Base. The questionnaire is designed to evaluate a contractor's performance across multiple dimensions, including personnel recruitment, technical performance, management, compliance with performance standards, quality control systems, issue resolution, and invoicing practices. The evaluation uses a confidence assessment rating scale ranging from 1 (Unknown Confidence) to 5 (Substantial Confidence), with the intent of providing a comprehensive assessment of the contractor's past performance for a potential future contract with the United States Air Force (USAF).
The form includes detailed sections for a third-party evaluator to provide ratings and commentary on specific performance aspects, with pre-filled ratings of "Substantial" for several key areas such as overall technical performance, management performance, compliance with standards, quality control systems, proactive quality issue resolution, and invoicing practices. The questionnaire is to be returned to Addlene Williams at 99 CONS/PKC, Nellis AFB, NV 89191, and is part of the evaluation process for the upcoming custodial services contract.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 2 - Custodial Services Price Sheet v3.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 3 - Wage Determination 2015-5593 Rev.29.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Custodial PWS 1 Dec 25.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Custodial Services Price Sheet v2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FY26 Nellis Custodial
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Business being evaluated:
Past Performance under Contract/Project Number:
This past performance questionnaire will be used to evaluate the above corporation in its offer to the USAF for 99 CES Custodial Services contract at Nellis Air Force Base. Please complete the following questions as thoroughly as possible.
1. Did the company in question perform as the prime contractor or subcontractor?
[ ] Prime [ ] Subcontractor If subcontractor, please describe the frequency/type of interaction you held with company:
2. Description of services/product provided (if subcontractor, please describe only their specific role in the project):
3. Contract Value (if subcontractor, please only indicate amount actually performed by sub):
4. Period of Performance (if subcontractor, please indicate POP of sub’s portion of project):
From:
INSTRUCTIONS – After commenting, please score in column on the right using the rating scale defined below:
PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENTS
Rating Description
SUBSTANTIAL
CONFIDENCE
(5)
Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
SATISFACTORY
CONFIDENCE
(4)
Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
LIMITED CONFIDENCE
(3)
Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
NO CONFIDENCE
(2)
Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
UNKNOWN CONFIDENCE
(1) No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.
1. Address the contractor’s ability to recruit and maintain qualified personnel. Please specifically address turnover.
Rating
2. Address the contractor’s overall technical performance on this task order.
3. Address the contractor’s overall management performance on this task order.
4. Address the contractor’s compliance with and ability to maintain performance standards.
5. Address the effectiveness of the contractor’s quality control systems.
6. Address the contractor’s proactive resolution of quality issues.
7. Address your experience with the contractor’s invoicing practices (problems? overbilling? Inaccuracies?)
8. Rate the contractor’s overall performance.
9. Do you know of any other source that has knowledge of this contractor’s performance on similar work?
Name/Company:
Telephone No.:
Evaluator’s Name/Organization:
Signature and Date: Phone/e-mail address:
Thank you for your time and cooperation.
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
ATTN: Addlene Williams
99 CONS/PKC
Nellis AFB, NV 89191 E-mail: addlene.williams.6@us.af.mil mailto:addlene.williams.6@us.af.mil
| 1 Address the contractors ability to recruit and maintain qualified personnel Please specifically address turnover: |
| 2 Address the contractors overall technical performance on this task order: |
| 3 Address the contractors overall management performance on this task order: |
| 4 Address the contractors compliance with and ability to maintain performance standards: |
| 5 Address the effectiveness of the contractors quality control systems: |
| 6 Address the contractors proactive resolution of quality issues: |
| 7 Address your experience with the contractors invoicing practices problems overbilling Inaccuracies: |
| 8 Rate the contractors overall performance: |
| Evaluators NameOrganization: |
| Phoneemail address: |
| Check Box1: Off |
| Check Box2: Off |
| Text3: |
| Text4: |
| Text5: |
| Text6: |
| Dropdown8: |
| 1: [Substantial] |
| 2: [Substantial] |
| 3: [Substantial] |
| 4: [Substantial] |
| 5: [Substantial] |
| 6: [Substantial] |
| 0: |
| 0: [Substantial] |
| 1: [Substantial] |
| Text9: |
| Text10: |
| Text11: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .