Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 457 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1305M325R0014
About this file
The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation #1305M325R0014, related to the Earth Prediction Innovation Center (EPIC)-Advancing Weather Modeling Skills opportunity. The questionnaire is designed to assess a contractor's performance across four key evaluation areas: Quality of Service, Schedule, Cost Control, and Management. Evaluators are instructed to use an adjectival rating scale ranging from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory, with definitions provided for each rating level that consider factors such as contractual compliance, problem resolution, and overall performance effectiveness.
The form requires detailed ratings and comments for each performance area, with space for the reference to indicate whether they would recommend the contractor for similar future requirements. The questionnaire is part of a source selection process for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), allowing the government to systematically review and compare potential contractors' past performance as part of the evaluation criteria for the EPIC contract opportunity.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1305M325R0014_Amd 0004 (Final 3.2.2026).pdf | ||
| 1305M325R0014_Amd 0003 (Final 2.20.2026).pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - Pricing Schedule_Amd 0003 (2.20.2026).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 1305M325R0014_Amd 0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 - Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - TO1 PWS_Amd 0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - Pricing Schedule_Amd 0001.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 1305M325R0014_Amd 0001-Conformed.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - EPIC 2.0 IDIQ PWS_Amd 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 1 - EPIC 2.0 IDIQ PWS.docx.pdf | ||
| 1305M325R0014.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Technical Capability Projects.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 5 - Pricing Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 2 - TO1 PWS.pdf |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 4: PAST PERFORMACE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION # 1305M325R0014
Source Selection Information
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Contractor Being Evaluated:
Contract number:
Project Title:
Period of Performance:
Total Funded Value:
Past Performance Reference Name:
Reference role on the project:
Questionnaire Instructions: Please assess the contractor’s performance on the referenced contract using the following adjectival rating scale:
ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Source Selection Information
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE. Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
Rating:
Comments:
2. SCHEDULE. Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance.
Rating:
Comments:
3. COST CONTROL. Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost.
Rating:
Comments:
5. MANAGEMENT. Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction. Check the appropriate rating box.
Rating:
Comments:
Source Selection Information
Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with this contract or order's most significant requirements, I ___would ___would not recommend them for similar requirements in the future.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE SIGNATURE [note: digital signature is acceptable]:
| PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE |
| Contractor Being Evaluated: |
| Contract number: |
| Project Title: |
| Period of Performance: |
| Total Funded Value: |
| Past Performance Reference Name: |
| Past Performance Reference role on the referenced project: |
| 2. SCHEDULE. Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance. |
| Text1: |
| Dropdown3: [[Select Rating Below]] |
| Text6: |
| Text2: |
| Text3: |
| Text4: |
| Text5: |
| Text7: |
| Dropdown1: [[Select Rating Below]] |
| Dropdown2: [[Select Rating Below]] |
| Dropdown4: [[Select Rating Below]] |
| Group4: Off |
| Text8: |
| Text9: |
| Text10: |
| Text11: |
| Text12: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .