Attachment 4 Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 55 KB Posted

Attached to
Solid Waste Disposal Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W911KF-21-Q-0004
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Detroit Arsenal

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire related to a solid waste disposal solicitation from the Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Detroit Arsenal. The solicitation seeks a contractor to provide all labor, equipment, and refuse containers necessary to collect and dispose of non-hazardous solid waste from Anniston Army Depot in Alabama. The contractor must dispose of the waste at an approved RCRA Subtitle D disposal facility and provide hazardous roll-off box relocation services upon notification. The contract will include a base year plus four option years. The past performance questionnaire requests ratings and narratives from previous customers on factors such as schedule adherence, technical requirements compliance, responsiveness, and overall performance to assist in the source selection process. Responses are requested by the completion date indicated and will be protected as source selection sensitive information.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Solid Waste Disposal, newest first.
File Type Posted
W911KF-21-Q-0004- 01.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 Evidence of Authority to Sign Offers.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 Wage Determination SCA WD 15-4588 REV.12.txt TXT text file
Attachment 3 Request for Technical Literature.docx DOCX document
Attachment 1 Updated SOW - Solid Waste Disposal 04082021.doc DOC document
W911KF-21-Q-0004.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Questionnaire

This Questionnaire relates to solicitation requirements for

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE –

Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection for Anniston Army Depot.

Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Marquetta.s.taylor.civ@mail.mil

Director of Contracting

Anniston Army Depot

7 Frankford Ave.

Anniston, AL 36201-4199

ATTN: Marquetta Taylor Phone: 259-741-5128 E-mail: Marquetta.s.taylor.civ@mail.mil

Desired Response Date:

When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

Proposed prime contractor

1. OFFEROR NAME
OFFEROR ADDRESS

Contractor Name and Address and contract/project information being addressed in this questionnaire

2. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:
2. CONTRACT NO.:

3. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:

4. COMPLETION DATE:

5. CONTRACT VALUE (with options):

6. TYPE OF CONTRACT:

7. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT REQUIREMENTS:

8. Point of Contact: Provide the following information for the company and individual completing this questionnaire:

Company/Agency Name and Address:

Name of person completing this questionnaire:

Title:

Role/responsibility for the effort being addressed in the survey:

Phone Number:

E-Mail:

Rating Scale:

EXCELLENT: Superior performance. Objectives/requirements essentially always achieved or exceeded, with inconsequential exceptions.

GOOD: Highly satisfactory performance. Objectives/requirements achieved with only rare exceptions, and the exceptions had minor consequences.

ADEQUATE: Generally satisfactory performance. Objectives/requirements generally achieved with occasional exceptions, and, in most cases, the exceptions had minor consequences.

MARGINAL: Occasionally unsatisfactory performance of significance. Objectives/requirements were not fully achieved, with significant consequences in some cases.

POOR: Frequently unsatisfactory performance of significance. Objectives/requirements frequently not achieved, with significant consequences.

UNKNOWN: Unable to rate, not observed, or not a significant aspect of performance.

9. Questionnaire: Please indicate the rating that best reflects your experience with this contractor and provide a short narrative addressing the basis for the ratings assigned. Address compliance with requirements, actual performance, problems encountered and problem resolution. Use additional sheets if necessary. Excellent contract management, attention to

Detail and Quality Assurance.

A. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s business-like concern for its customers, including such factors as dependability, flexibility, early problem identification, communication, and responsiveness.

Excellent
Good
Adequate
Marginal
Poor
Unknown

B. Schedule – Assess the contractor’s adherence to delivery commitments; responsiveness to requests for accelerations; and early identification and mitigation of schedule slippages.

Excellent
Good
Adequate
Marginal
Poor
Unknown

C. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s performance in conforming to contract specifications:

Excellent
Good
Adequate
Marginal
Poor
Unknown

D. Technical Responsiveness – Assess the contractor’s ability to identify and resolve technical problems effectively and in a timely manner, including correction of faulty work and warranty claims:

Excellent
Good
Adequate
Marginal
Poor
Unknown

E. Overall Assessment: Provide your overall assessment.

Excellent
Good
Adequate
Marginal
Poor
Unknown

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .