Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionaire RFP 36C24822Q1369.docx

DOCX document 19 KB Posted

Attached to
J061--FY22: Triennial Electrical Distribution System Testing Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C24822Q1369
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 8

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contractor responding to solicitation number 36C24822Q1369 for electrical distribution system testing services. The solicitation is from the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 8. The past performance questionnaire requests adjectival ratings on a scale of excellent, good, satisfactory, marginal, poor, or no rating on the contractor's ability to meet quality standards, comply with contract terms, prepare technical documentation, implement quality control programs, manage contracts, oversee multidiscipline construction, resolve issues, respond to emergencies, manage materials, propose cost-saving innovations, ensure safety, submit accurate invoices, retain qualified staff, and any default or financial issues. Completed questionnaires must be returned directly to the point of contact listed by the deadline to be considered in the evaluation.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to J061--FY22: Triennial Electrical Distribution System Testing, newest first.
File Type Posted
36C24822Q1369_3.docx DOCX document
36C24822Q1369_2.docx DOCX document
Attachment 5 - SOW.docx DOCX document
Attachment 2 - Campus Short Circuit Study Binder1.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Tampa VA Breaker List.pdf PDF
S02 - RFQ 36C24822Q1369.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Limitations on Subcontracting.docx DOCX document
36C24822Q1369_1.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

ATTACHMENT 4

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE COVER SHEET

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION RFP #36C24822Q1369

The entire questionnaire should be forwarded to your previous clients for completion and clients shall directly return the cover sheet and questionnaire to Brittney Pastore at e-mail address: brittney.pastore@va.gov It is your responsibility to ensure correct and verifiable point of contact information. Information that is incorrect or unverifiable may lead to a lower past performance rating.

(Offeror Fill-In Below)

1. Offeror Name (Name of Organization/Firm being Evaluated):

2. Name of Organization/Firm Providing Reference:

3. Address of Organization/Firm Providing Reference:

4. Contract Number:

5. Project Description:

6. Contract/Task Order Amount:

7. Performance Period:

8. Evaluator’s Point of Contact Information:

Name and Title:____________________________________________________________

Phone Number:____________________________________________________________

Fax Number:_______________________________________________________________

E-Mail Address:_____________________________________________________________

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION RFP #36C24822Q1369

ADJECTIVAL RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

E (EXCELLENT)
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds expectations. The contractual performance of the element assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. (High Confidence).
G (GOOD)
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. (Significant Confidence).
S (SATISFACTORY)
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the elements contains some minor problems for which corrective action taken by the contractor is satisfactory. (Confidence).
M (MARGINAL)
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. (Little Confidence).
P (POOR)
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is no likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element contains serious problems for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. (No confidence).
NR (NO RATING)
No relevant past performance record is identifiable upon which to base a meaningful performance risk prediction. A search was unable to identify any relevant past performance information for the contractor or their key personnel. (This is neither a negative or positive assessment).

EVALUATOR: PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVAL RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

Was this a competitive contract?
YES NO
Role of the contractor
Prime Contractor or Subcontractor
Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance
E G S M P NR
Compliance with contractual terms and conditions
E G S M P NR
Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts.
E G S M P NR
Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirement.
E G S M P NR
Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, and control the project.)
E G S M P NR
Effectiveness of on-site management and control of multidiscipline construction categories, including management of subcontractors.
E G S M P NR
Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports).
E G S M P NR
Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.
E G S M P NR
Ability to successfully respond to emergency situations.
E G S M P NR
Effectiveness of material management.
E G S M P NR
Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client.
E G S M P NR
Contractor Safety Record.
E G S M P NR
Contractor responsiveness to safety issues.
E G S M P NR
Contractor’s timeliness, completeness, and accuracy in submitting invoices.
E G S M P NR
Ability to hire and retain a qualified workforce to this effort.
E G S M P NR

If this was a Government contract has the contract been terminated for default or Convenience? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued or any default action in the comment section below.

E G S M P NR

Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problem?

E G S M P NR

COMMENTS:

Evaluator’s Point of Contact Information:

Signature and Title:_________________________________________________________

Phone Number:____________________________________________________________

E-Mail Address:_____________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .