Attachment 4 - Evaluation Factors.pdf
PDF 232 KB Posted
- Attached to
- C-SUAS Equipment Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4419-26-Q-0017
About this file
This is a Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause 52.212-2 for the evaluation of commercial items, effective November 2021, with an addendum detailing specific evaluation criteria.
The clause establishes a two-factor evaluation methodology for awarding contracts for commercial products and services. Best value is achieved through selection of the technically acceptable quote with the lowest evaluated price. Quotes are evaluated on Factor 1 (Price) and Factor 2 (Technical Acceptability). Price evaluation includes the total evaluated price of CLIN 0001 plus CLIN 0002, encompassing both Funded and Unfunded CLINs, with the Government reserving the right to award to other than the lowest quote if higher quality justifies the decision. Technical evaluation assesses whether the vendor's quoted item meets all requirements in the Salient Characteristics Attachment and is rated as either "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable." A quote receives an "Acceptable" rating if it clearly meets minimum solicitation requirements and an "Unacceptable" rating if it does not. Vendors must submit technical information as a secondary document with clear, concise detail sufficient for effective evaluation and substantiation of claims, assuming the Government has no prior knowledge of the offeror's experience. By submitting a quote, vendors accept all solicitation requirements, and failure to conform may result in the quote being deemed non-awardable without further evaluation.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 2 - Provisions and Clauses - Drones.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Salient Characteristics.pdf | ||
| Combined_Synopsis_Solicitation - 21 Apr 26.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Instructions to offerers.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (NOV 2021)
As prescribed in 12.301(c), the Contracting Officer may insert a provision substantially as follows:
Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Nov 2021)
(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
Price Technical Acceptability
(End of provision)
ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2:
Best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable quote with the lowest evaluated price.
By submission of its quote, the vendor accepts all solicitation requirements, including all technical requirements and terms and conditions. Failure to conform to solicitation requirements may result in a quote being determined not awardable without further evaluation. The evaluation criteria are detailed below:
Factor 1 – Price. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose quotation conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price (which will include both Funded and Unfunded CLINs) and other factors considered. The Government reserves the right to award to other than the low quote for a higher quality item. Quotes will be evaluated using the Total Evaluated Price of CLIN 0001 plus CLIN 0002.
Factor 2 – Technical. The purpose of the technical factor is to assess whether the vendor’s quoted item meets all of the provided information from the Salient Characteristics Attachment. Each vendor’s quote will be evaluated against technical requirements and will be assigned a rating of “acceptable” or “unacceptable.” Technical submission must be completed using a secondary document. The Technical information shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. Quotess shall provide convincing rationale addressing how the technical portion of the offer meets solicitation requirements. Offerors shall assume the Government has no prior knowledge of the offeror’s experience. The Government will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offer.
Rating Description:
“Acceptable” - Quote clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
“Unacceptable” - Quote does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
The quote will be determined technically acceptable if it meets the requirements set out in the Attachment 1 - Salient Characteristics.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .