Attachment_3_-_S_T_PROTECTION_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN__PIP__TEMPLATE.docx

DOCX document 85 KB Posted

Attached to
Protean
Opportunity number
DARPARA2601
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Science and Technology (S&T) Protection Implementation Plan (PIP) template for DARPA contractors to document their strategies for protecting critical technologies and information associated with their research projects. The template requires contractors to develop and maintain a comprehensive protection strategy covering multiple dimensions of security including personnel security, physical security, operations security, industrial security, information technology security, and supply chain risk management. Contractors must identify Critical Program Information (CPI) and Critical Components within their work, assess threats to the technology using available threat assessments from the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) and FBI, and document specific countermeasures and mitigations for each identified risk. The plan must address observables identification and containment, protection of work performed at lower classification levels, foreign involvement and treaty compliance, program risk management integration, financial and procurement security, and procedures for monitoring and reporting unauthorized disclosures or compromises.

The template structure requires contractors to provide an executive summary, critical events schedule, detailed mapping of protected items to countermeasures across 16 key protection areas, and documentation of team member locations and responsibilities throughout the contract performance period. Contractors must establish processes for continuous monitoring through audits, inspections, engineering reviews, and verification activities, and must detail procedures for material and information system disposition in accordance with federal guidelines and Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA) coordination requirements. The document emphasizes that sections not applicable to a specific program should be marked "Not Applicable" to allow flexibility as programs evolve, and the plan must be reviewed and updated at least annually and at key program milestones by the Contractor Program Security Officer and Program Manager to ensure countermeasures remain aligned with current threat levels and program vulnerabilities.

S&T PIP Template

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

INSERT CLASSIFICATION

S&T Protection Implementation Plan Insert Company Logo

Technology OfficeChoose an item.
Program NameClick or tap here to enter text.
Contractor Program NameClick or tap here to enter text.
SignatureSignature
Click or tap here to enter text.Click or tap here to enter text.
Program ManagerContractor Program Manager
Date Click or tap to enter a date.Date Click or tap to enter a date.
SignatureSignature
Click or tap here to enter text.Click or tap here to enter text.
Program Security OfficerContractor Program Security Officer
Date Click or tap to enter a date.Date Click or tap to enter a date.

Classified By: Click or tap here to enter text.

Derived From: Click or tap here to enter text.Controlled by:

CUI Category: OPSEC Distribution: FEDCON

POC:

Declassify On: Click or tap to enter a date.

(U) FOREWORD

(CUI at minimum) This S&T PIP outlines [insert performer name] implementation of P2 strategies to protect critical technologies associated with [insert DARPA Tech Office and Project Name]. [DARPA Project Name] is a [insert CUI, Collateral, SAP, SCI, or combination] project.

(U) This document will be updated periodically and reviewed by the CPSO and CPM at least annually and at key program milestones to ensure it continues to capture the current program mission and objectives as well as the threat level and vulnerabilities to critical program information. This will allow the team to adjust needed countermeasures to protect this information.

(CUI at minimum)It is important to note that this outline is expected to be tailored to the program. Sections that are not used/needed will be marked “Not Applicable” so that they are available for future consideration as the program evolves and periodic updates are made to the [insert performer name][DARPA Project Name] S&T PIP.

(U) Table of Contents

1.0(U) Executive Summary and Assumptions5
2.0 (U) S&T Protection Critical Events5
2.1 (U) Schedule5
3.0 (U) Critical Program Information (CPI) and Critical Components5
4.0 (U) S&T Protection Risks6
4.1 (U) Threat to the Technology6
4.2 (U) Observables Identification and Containment6
4.3 (U) Description of Work being performed at lower classification levels6
4.4 (U) Program Risk Management6
5.0 (U) Program Financial / Procurement Requirements:6
6.0 (U) Foreign Involvement6
6.1. (U) Treaty Compliance6
6.2. (U) Foreign Personnel or Foreign Subcontractors6
7.0 (U) Processes for Management and Implementation of the S&T PIP7
7.1 (U) Audits/Inspections7
7.2 (U) Engineering/Technical Reviews7
7.3 (U) Verification and Validations7
7.4 (U) Sustainment7
8.0 (U) Monitoring and Reporting Unauthorized Disclosure or Compromise7
9.0 (U) Program Material Disposition Requirements:7
10.0 (U) Definitions7

11. (U) Other Addenda as Required………………………………………………………………..……….7

(U) References

(U) DoD Instruction 5200.39, Critical Program Information (CPI) Identification and Protection within Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E), Change 2 dated 15 Oct 2018

(U) DoD Instruction 5000.48, Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), March 6, 2020

(U) DoD Instruction 5000.83, Technology and Program Protection to Maintain Technological Advantage, dated 20 Jul 2020

(U) DARPA CG-XXXX, “Name”, Month, day, year

(U) DARPA CUI Guide, “Name”, month, day, year

1.0 (U) Executive Summary and Assumptions

(U) The prime contractor will outline their protection strategy and assumptions in the Executive Summary section. This should be 1-2 paragraphs that give the Program Manager (PM), Program Security Officer (PSO) or Special Access Program Central Office (SAPCO) a snapshot of the plan, intended outcomes, measures of success, and key assumptions.

2.0 (U) S&T Protection Critical Events

2.1 (U) Schedule: (This is the Integrated Master Schedule that shows S&T Protection Milestones such as S&T Protection Working Group, key POCs etc…)

3.0 (U) Critical Program Information (CPI) and Critical Components

3.1 (U) CPI and Critical Components: List CPI and Critical Components here; components that are considered under a CUI category should be reviewed for inclusion

Protected Item (Inherited and Organic) Countermeasures

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
CPI
1
Critical Components
7

Key

General Countermeasures
Research and Technology Protection Countermeasures
Trusted Systems Design Countermeasures

Key X = Implemented I = Denotes protection already implemented if CPI is inherited 1 Personnel Security 2 Physical Security 3 Operations Security 4 Industrial Security 5 Training 6 Information Security 7 Foreign Disclosure Agreement 8 Transportation Management 9 Anti-Tamper 10 Dial-down Functionality 11 IA/Network Security 12 Communications Security 13 Software Assurance 14 Supply Chain Risk Management/Manufacturing Plan 15 Systems Security Engineering (SSE) 16 Other

3.2. (U) Protected Item table:

3.3 (U) Protected Item Location and Explanation of Mitigations: The prime contractor will list the team members who will work on Program XX, what their responsibilities are, and where the Program XX CPI and Critical Components will be located throughout the life of the program. This should include a matrixed table or descriptive paragraph that explains how each identified risk is mitigated at the team locations.

4.0 (U) S&T Protection Risks: Ensure that all elements listed in section 3 “P2 Challenges” of the S&T Protection Plan provide by DARPA are addressed below or a note indicating where they are addressed elsewhere in your protection plan is included.

4.1 (U) Threat to the Technology: The Prime Contractor should leverage available DCSA and/or FBI threat assessments and reports to identify location-specific threats as well as threats relevant to program technology thrust(s). This data is useful to capture threats in order to ensure mitigation and containment strategies are properly aligned to reduce risk

4.2 (U) Observables Identification and Containment: The Prime Contractor will describe their process for integration of OPSEC and other program-related observables into the S&T Protection Process, and provide mitigation strategies for these observables.

4.3 (U) Description of Work being performed at lower classification levels: The Prime Contractor will describe their process protecting program information when leveraging unclassified or lower classified work in support of the DARPA XX program. Include unclassified subcontractor or vendor relationships/work and the associated risk in support of the DARPA XX program.

4.4 (U) Program Risk Management: The Prime Contractor will describe how S&T Protection risks (cost, schedule, technical) will be integrated with the overall program risk management.

5.0 (U) Program Financial / Procurement Requirements:

(CUI) The prime contractor will identify key program financial and procurement observables specific to this program, and identify containment strategies to prevent these issues from compromising the S&T protection strategy and revealing a capability critical to national security.

6.0 (U) Foreign Involvement

6.1. (U) Treaty Compliance: The prime contractor will outline applicable treaty compliance plans and whether or not any organizations on their team receive foreign visitor and how that will impact the program’s risk of exposure
6.2. (U) Foreign Personnel or Foreign Subcontractors: The prime contractor will outline any foreign personnel planned or expected to participate in this program and describe how that impacts the program protection posture.

7.0 (U) Processes for Management and Implementation of the S&T PIP (The contractor should describe the continuous monitoring process of the S&T PIP)

7.1 (U) Audits/Inspections
7.2 (U) Engineering/Technical Reviews
7.3 (U) Verification and Validations
7.4 (U) Sustainment

8.0 (U) Monitoring and Reporting Unauthorized Disclosure or Compromise (CUI) The prime contractor will detail their monitoring strategy for program observables, and identify how they will prevent unauthorized disclosure or compromise through protection planning strategies to support their entire team (to include subcontractors and vendors).

9.0 (U) Program Material Disposition Requirements:

9.1. (CUI) Material Disposition: The prime contractor will articulate disposition of material X in accordance with federal and state safety guidelines to include any coordination with the Defense Contracts Management Agency (DCMA).

9.2. (CUI) Material Archival: The prime contractor will describe procedures to ensure that if not required by the transition partners, the operational prototype will be kept for program disposition until the end of contract and shipped/couriered to DARPA IAW with PSO guidance.

9.3. (CUI) Information System Disposition: The prime contractor will articulate disposition of information systems in accordance with guidance outlined in the applicable contract DD Form 254.

10.0 (U) Definitions

(U) Countermeasures: The employment of devices or techniques that impair the operational effectiveness of enemy activity. Countermeasures may include anything that effectively negates an adversary’s ability to exploit vulnerabilities.

(U) Critical Component: A subsystem, assembly, or component of a system that itself delivers mission-critical functionality to the system, or that may, by virtue of system design, expose vulnerability in the mission-critical functions of other components within the system.

(U) Critical Program Information (CPI): CPI are U.S. capability elements that contribute to the warfighters’ technical advantage, which if compromised, undermines U.S. military preeminence. U.S. capability elements may include, but are not limited to, software algorithms and specific hardware residing on the system, its training equipment, or maintenance support equipment.

(U) Inherited CPI: CPI that is owned and generated by one RDT&E program, subsystem, or project, and is incorporated into, and used by, another RDT&E program.

(U) Organic CPI: Unique CPI that is owned and generated by an RDT&E program.

(U) Risk: A future event or condition that may have a negative effect on achieving program objectives for cost, schedule, or performance. Risk are defined by (1) the probability of an undesired event or condition, and (2) the consequences, impact, or severity of the undesired event if it were to occur.

(U) Risk Management: The process of identifying, assessing, and controlling risks by making decisions that balance risk costs with mission benefits. Costs may be measured in financial cost, loss of asset, loss of information, or loss of reputation.

(U) Technical Decomposition: Method of analysis that breaks down a complex process or system by means of its functions in a hierarchal manner to identify critical components potentially requiring enhanced protection.

(U) Threat: An assessment of foreign adversary interest and skill in obtaining CPI.

(U) Unauthorized Disclosure: A communication or physical transfer of non-public information, controlled unclassified, or classified information to an unauthorized recipient.

(U) Vulnerability: A condition enabling an adversary to collect, analyze, and react to critical information or indicators.

11.0 (U) Other Addenda as Required

INSERT CLASSIFICATION

image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .