Attachment 3 PPQ.docx

DOCX document 14 KB Posted

Attached to
DoDEA Pacific South Okinawa Bus Lease
Solicitation number
HE1254-20-R-2006
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Enclosure 3 52.222-56.pdf PDF
Enclosure 1 52.209-7.pdf PDF
Enclosure 2 52.212-3 Alt 1.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 PWS.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 Technical Capability.pdf PDF
Enclosure 4 LoC.pdf PDF
HE1254-R-20-2006.pdf PDF
Attachment 6 Reps and Certs.pdf PDF
Enclosure 5 CPARS.pdf PDF
Attachment 2- Pricing Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

This Questionnaire Pertains to: Security Training The Offeror must complete the “To be completed by Offeror” section prior to sending the PPQ to the Offeror’s Reference/Customer. The Offeror’s Reference/Customer must complete the PPQ’s evaluation section and return the complete PPQ via email to the attention of:

Department of Defense Education Activity Attn: Contract Specialist: Eric Mensah & Contracting Officer: Colleen C. Pritchard 4800 Mark Center Drive, 5th Floor, Suite #05H02-10 Alexandria, VA 22350

E-Mail: Eric.Mensah@dodea.edu E-Mail: Colleen.Pritchard@dodea.edu

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

Other (Explain) Joint Venture Sub Contractor Work

Performed as Prime

Contractor DUNs Number: Email Address:

Point of Contact Number:

Contractor Information:

Firm

Name:

CAGE

Code:

Address:

Phone Number:

Point of Contact:

)This information section is to be completed by the Offeror.

Period of Performance:

Other (Please specify):

Cost Reimbursement Firm Fixed Price Final Contract Value:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Email Address:

Point of Contact Number:

Phone Number:

Point of Contact:

Address:

Reference Information:

Business Name of Reference:

HE1254-20-R-2006

Attachment 3

Present and Past Performance Questionnaire

SOURCE

SELECTION

INFORMATION-SEE

FAR

2.101

AND

3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Explain any problems and resolutions Brief Description of Effort to include relevancy to the solicitation requirements of the RFP.

This evaluation section is to be completed by the Offeror’s customer.

Evaluation KEY: Please use the following abbreviations to assign an applicable rating for questions 1 thru 6 below:

P/U
S
G
VG
E
N
Poor/Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Neutral/N/A

Does not meet minimum

Meets or slightly

Effective

Very effective

Of exceptional

No record

acceptable standards in
exceeds minimum
performance; fully
performance; fully
merit; exemplary
of relevant
one or more areas;
acceptable
responsive to
responsive to contract
performance in a
past performance
remedial action required
standards; adequate
contract
requirements; contract
timely, efficient,
or past
in one or more areas;
results; reportable
requirements;
requirements
and economical
performance
deficiencies in one or
deficiencies with
reportable
accomplished in a timely,
manner; very
information is not
more areas which
identifiable, but not
deficiencies, but with
efficient, and economical
minor (if any)
available.
adversely affect overall
substantial, effects on
little identifiable
manner for the most part;
deficiencies with
performance.
overall performance.
effect on overall
only minor deficiencies
no adverse effect
performance.
with minimal effect on
on overall
overall performance.
performance.

1. How would you rate the contractor’s compliance with the delivery schedule / performance milestones? Comments:

P/U

S

G

VG

E

N

2. How would you rate the contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining a positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively resolution of any problems etc.)? Comments:

P/U

S

G

VG

E

N

3. How would you rate the contractor’s record of conforming to contract requirements and to standards of good workmanship/quality of the product or service/timeliness of performance/report submission? Comments:

P/U

S

G

VG

E

N

4. How would you rate the contractor’s overall compliance with the terms and conditions of your purchase order /contract? Comments:

P/U

S

G

VG

E

N

5. How would you rate the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction; and generally, the contractor’s business-like concern for the interest of the customer? Comments:

P/U

S

G

VG

E

N

6. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance? Comments:

P/U

S

G

VG

E

N

7. Would you purchase services from this contractor again? Comments:

YES

NO

Please provide any additional comments applicable to the contractor’s past performance:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .