Attachment 3 PPQ.docx
DOCX document 14 KB Posted
- Attached to
- DoDEA Pacific South Okinawa Bus Lease
- Solicitation number
- HE1254-20-R-2006
- Issued by
-
Department of Defense Education Activity
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Enclosure 3 52.222-56.pdf | ||
| Enclosure 1 52.209-7.pdf | ||
| Enclosure 2 52.212-3 Alt 1.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 PWS.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 Technical Capability.pdf | ||
| Enclosure 4 LoC.pdf | ||
| HE1254-R-20-2006.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 Reps and Certs.pdf | ||
| Enclosure 5 CPARS.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2- Pricing Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
This Questionnaire Pertains to: Security Training The Offeror must complete the “To be completed by Offeror” section prior to sending the PPQ to the Offeror’s Reference/Customer. The Offeror’s Reference/Customer must complete the PPQ’s evaluation section and return the complete PPQ via email to the attention of:
Department of Defense Education Activity Attn: Contract Specialist: Eric Mensah & Contracting Officer: Colleen C. Pritchard 4800 Mark Center Drive, 5th Floor, Suite #05H02-10 Alexandria, VA 22350
E-Mail: Eric.Mensah@dodea.edu E-Mail: Colleen.Pritchard@dodea.edu
Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
Other (Explain) Joint Venture Sub Contractor Work
Performed as Prime
Contractor DUNs Number: Email Address:
Point of Contact Number:
Contractor Information:
Firm
Name:
CAGE
Code:
Address:
Phone Number:
Point of Contact:
)This information section is to be completed by the Offeror.
Period of Performance:
Other (Please specify):
Cost Reimbursement Firm Fixed Price Final Contract Value:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Email Address:
Point of Contact Number:
Phone Number:
Point of Contact:
Address:
Reference Information:
Business Name of Reference:
HE1254-20-R-2006
Attachment 3
Present and Past Performance Questionnaire
SOURCE
SELECTION
INFORMATION-SEE
FAR
2.101
AND
3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Explain any problems and resolutions Brief Description of Effort to include relevancy to the solicitation requirements of the RFP.
This evaluation section is to be completed by the Offeror’s customer.
Evaluation KEY: Please use the following abbreviations to assign an applicable rating for questions 1 thru 6 below:
| P/U |
| S |
| G |
| VG |
| E |
| N |
| Poor/Unsatisfactory |
| Satisfactory |
| Good |
| Very Good |
| Excellent |
| Neutral/N/A |
Does not meet minimum
Meets or slightly
Effective
Very effective
Of exceptional
No record
| acceptable standards in |
| exceeds minimum |
| performance; fully |
| performance; fully |
| merit; exemplary |
| of relevant |
| one or more areas; |
| acceptable |
| responsive to |
| responsive to contract |
| performance in a |
| past performance |
| remedial action required |
| standards; adequate |
| contract |
| requirements; contract |
| timely, efficient, |
| or past |
| in one or more areas; |
| results; reportable |
| requirements; |
| requirements |
| and economical |
| performance |
| deficiencies in one or |
| deficiencies with |
| reportable |
| accomplished in a timely, |
| manner; very |
| information is not |
| more areas which |
| identifiable, but not |
| deficiencies, but with |
| efficient, and economical |
| minor (if any) |
| available. |
| adversely affect overall |
| substantial, effects on |
| little identifiable |
| manner for the most part; |
| deficiencies with |
| performance. |
| overall performance. |
| effect on overall |
| only minor deficiencies |
| no adverse effect |
| performance. |
| with minimal effect on |
| on overall |
| overall performance. |
| performance. |
1. How would you rate the contractor’s compliance with the delivery schedule / performance milestones? Comments:
P/U
S
G
VG
E
N
2. How would you rate the contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining a positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively resolution of any problems etc.)? Comments:
P/U
S
G
VG
E
N
3. How would you rate the contractor’s record of conforming to contract requirements and to standards of good workmanship/quality of the product or service/timeliness of performance/report submission? Comments:
P/U
S
G
VG
E
N
4. How would you rate the contractor’s overall compliance with the terms and conditions of your purchase order /contract? Comments:
P/U
S
G
VG
E
N
5. How would you rate the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction; and generally, the contractor’s business-like concern for the interest of the customer? Comments:
P/U
S
G
VG
E
N
6. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance? Comments:
P/U
S
G
VG
E
N
7. Would you purchase services from this contractor again? Comments:
YES
NO
Please provide any additional comments applicable to the contractor’s past performance:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .