Attachment 3 - PPQ.docx
DOCX document 30 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Survey Data Management Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- I822-24-IQ-00002
- Issued by
- US Agency for Global Media
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a solicitation. The past performance questionnaire requests ratings and comments on contractors' performance histories to assist in evaluating proposals for qualitative and/or quantitative research services. Respondents are asked to provide assessments in six areas using defined rating levels and to submit responses by March 8, 2024.
The solicitation seeks data management services to support quality control, standardization, unification and maintenance of nationally representative survey data. Services include survey database development. The North American Industry Classification System code provided is 541910 for marketing research and public opinion polling. Proposals are requested through this combined synopsis and solicitation with no separate solicitation document to be issued. The soliciting agency is the US Agency for Global Media.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 2 - Instructions to Offerors_Revised.pdf | ||
| RFP I822-24-IQ-00002_QA_final.pdf | ||
| Attachment B - USAGM Media Survey Codebook.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Statement of Work_Revised.pdf | ||
| Attachment A - USAGM Media Survey Extract.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Statement of Work_2.14.2024.pdf | ||
| Combined Solicitation and Synopsis.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Instructions to Offerors.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - Provisions__ Clauses.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs)
Past Performance Questionnaire The United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM) is requesting your assistance in assessing the performance history of contractors who can provide qualitative and/or quantitative research services.
Your rating and comments will provide insight and assist in USAGM’s evaluation.
Return your completed questionnaire directly to Contract Specialist, Christopher Jordan, via emails: cjordan@usagm.gov.
Please return by: Friday, March 8, 2024, at 12:00 pm EST.
Evaluator Information:
Company Name:
Company Address:
Your Name:
Title:
Dollar value of your current contract:
Please use the following definitions to assess contractor performance.
Past Performance Rating
| Adjective |
| Description |
| High Level Of Confidence |
| The Offeror’s recent and relevant past performance is very relevant to this acquisition; demonstrating very effective performance that would be fully responsive to contract requirements with contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part with only minor problems with little identifiable effect on overall performance. Based on the Offeror’s performance record, there is a high level of confidence that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Moderate Level of Confidence |
| The Offeror’s recent and relevant past performance is relevant to this acquisition, and it demonstrates effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable problems, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance. Based on the Offeror’s performance record, there is a moderate level of confidence that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Low Level of Confidence |
| The Offeror’s recent and relevant past performance is at least somewhat relevant to this acquisition, and it meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable problems with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance. Based on the Offeror’s performance record, there is a low level of confidence that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Changes to the Offeror’s existing processes may be necessary in order to achieve contract requirements. |
| No Confidence |
| The Offeror’s recent and relevant past performance is not relevant to this acquisition, and does not meet the minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable problems with identifiable substantial effects on overall performance. Based on the Offeror’s performance record, there is no confidence that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort |
| Neutral |
| In the case of an Offeror without a record of recent and relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance [see FAR 15.305(a) (2) (ii), and (iv).] |
Circle your choice below and please provide comments supporting your rating.
1. What is your assessment of the contractor’s quality of service (compliance with contract requirements, conformance to standards of good workmanship, accuracy of reports, technical excellence, customer satisfaction, etc.)?
High Level of Confidence Moderate Level of Confidence Low Level of Confidence No Confidence Neutral Comments:
2. What is your assessment of the contractor’s timeliness of performance (reliability, responsiveness to technical direction, adherence to contract schedule, etc.)? Did the contractor respond to service calls and supply orders in the timeframe specified in the contract requirements? Is the contractor able to provide support to remote locations? Do technicians possess the experience and expertise necessary to maintain and service the equipment?
High Level of Confidence Moderate Level of Confidence Low Level of Confidence No Confidence Neutral
3. What is your assessment of the contractor’s business relations (contract management, business-like correspondence, notification of problems and problem resolution, etc.)?
Moderate Level of Confidence Low Level of Confidence No Confidence Neutral
4. What is your assessment of the contractor’s invoicing procedures and policies? Does the contractor submit invoices accurately and timely? Is the billing staff proactive in resolving billing discrepancies?
Moderate Level of Confidence Low Level of Confidence No Confidence Neutral
5. What is your assessment of the contractor’s personnel management? Is the contractor’s work force properly trained and given proper direction? Are required tasks successfully performed?
Moderate Level of Confidence Low Level of Confidence No Confidence Neutral
6. What is your assessment of the contractor’s management of their team members? Does the contractor resolve any issues with team members in a timely manner?
Moderate Level of Confidence Low Level of Confidence No Confidence Neutral
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .