Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 160 KB Posted

Attached to
Army Force Organization Cost Estimating System (FORCES) Support Services
Solicitation number
W91CRB23R0006
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for offerors responding to the Department of the Army solicitation for Army Force Organization Cost Estimating System (FORCES) Support Services. The solicitation seeks proposals to provide administrative management and general management consulting services in support of FORCES. Offerors must provide information on relevant past federal, state, or local government contracts for the contracting officer to evaluate past performance. The questionnaire collects details on contract identification, products and services delivered, project management effectiveness, timeliness, cost control, customer satisfaction, and additional references. Respondents evaluate offerors' past performance on a scale of substantial confidence to no confidence and provide rationale. Completed questionnaires are due back to the contracting officer by December 8, 2023 to inform the source selection process for this contract.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND

6515 INTEGRITY COURT, BUILDING 4310

ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD 21005-3013

Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter

09 November 2023

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal

(RFP) W91CRB23R0006

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army Contracting Command – Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC-APG) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 541611 Administrative Management & General Management Consulting Services. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.

Please complete the enclosure and return to ACC-APG, 6515 Integrity Court, Bldg 4310, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, no later than 15 days after receipt of request or 08 December 2023, whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire to the Contract Specialist Tanner Torley at tanner.r.torley.civ@army.mil.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at Alexandra.c.bryant.civ@army.mil.

Sincerely, Alexandra C. Bryant Contracting Officer

Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does or notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence

Rationale: _________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .