Attachment 3 - Evaluation Factors.pdf
PDF 138 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Altus AFB CHAPEL CONTEMPORARY MUSICIAN
- Solicitation number
- FA441923Q0034
About this file
This document provides evaluation factors for a federal solicitation seeking a contemporary musician for Altus Air Force Base Chapel. Price and technical acceptability will be evaluated, with best value awarded to the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest price. Price evaluation will consider the total evaluated price over a five-year period including a 50% option for extended services. Technical proposals must demonstrate how requirements are met without restating the performance work statement. A rating of acceptable or unacceptable will be assigned based on clearly meeting requirements.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 3 Evaluation Factors F1B0R13179A002
52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL
SERVICES (NOV 2021)
(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate quotes:
1. Price
2. Technical Acceptability
(End of provision)
ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2:
Best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable quote with the lowest evaluated price. By submission of its quote, the vendor accepts all solicitation requirements, including all technical requirements and terms and conditions. Failure to conform to solicitation requirements may result in a quote being determined not awardable without further evaluation. The evaluation criteria are detailed below:
Factor 1 – Price. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose quotation conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The Government reserves the right to award to other than the low quote for a higher quality item. Prices will be evaluated on the Total Evaluated Price (TEP). TEP shall be the total of all years, base year and four
(4) option years, plus an additional 50% of the total of Option Year 4. The additional 50% represents the total cumulative price of 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services. Should FAR clause 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, be exercised in the future, the price will be pro-rated to the actual performance required.
Factor 2 – Technical. The purpose of the technical factor is to assess whether the vendor’s quoted item meets all of the provided information from the Performance Work Statement. Each vendor’s quote will be evaluated against technical requirements and will be assigned a rating of “acceptable” or “unacceptable.” Technical submission must be completed using a secondary document. The Technical information shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. Quotes shall not simply rephrase or restate the Performance Work Statement or contain general statements such as “Standard procedures will be employed.” Proposals shall provide convincing rationale addressing how the technical portion of the offer meets solicitation requirements. Offerors shall assume the Government has no prior knowledge of the offeror’s experience. The Government will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offer.
Rating Description:
“Acceptable” - Quote clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
“Unacceptable” - Quote does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
The quote will be determined technically acceptable if it meets the requirements set out in the Attachment 4 – Performance Work Statement
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .