Attachment 2 - SABER Industry Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 27 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Andersen AFB GUAM SABER IDIQ
- Solicitation number
- FA524024XSABER
About this file
This document is an Industry Questionnaire for a potential Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) contract at Andersen Air Force Base, Guam under NAICS code 236220 with a small business size standard of $45.0M. The questionnaire requests information from interested parties on their company history, capabilities, experience, and perspectives related to the potential contract. Key details include the anticipated IDIQ contract value up to $50M over 7 years, with task orders ranging from $2,000 to $2,000,000. The Government is seeking responses from small businesses, including 8(a), HUBZone, SDVOSB, and WOSB firms, to help determine the appropriate level of competition. Respondents are asked to provide information on their ability to perform multi-trade projects, mobilization/demobilization, construction estimating capabilities, project management experience, and perspectives on acquisition strategies. The responses will assist the 36th Contracting Squadron in AAFB's planning for the potential SABER IDIQ contract.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 1 - AAFB SABER Statement of Work (SOW) DRAFT.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 2, Industry Questionnaire
FA524024XSABER
INDUSTRY QUESTIONNAIRE
Interested parties should attempt to answer the following questions while reviewing Attachment (1) Statement of Work (SOW). Your company responses are limited to a maximum of 5 single-sided pages with text no less than 10-point font (Arial or Times New Roman) and a minimum of one-inch margins in Microsoft® Word, Adobe® PDF or compatible format. Do not include photos or references as part of the package.
Company Name:
Address:
| U.S. Company Yes | No | |||
| Size under NAICS code 236220: 8(a) HUBZone | SDVOSB | WOSB | Small | CAGE Code: |
Unique Entity ID:
POC Name and Title:
POC Phone and e-mail:
1. Provide a brief company history highlighting past relevant experience providing minor construction projects, to include associated logistic efforts, subcontracting plans, and foreseen difficulties associated with this effort.
2. Does your company have the capability/experience of performing multi-trade (e.g. electrical, painting, roofing, flooring, HVAC, paving/concrete, sewer/waterline, generators, asbestos, munitions and explosives of concern (MEC), civil, mechanical, structural, etc.) projects?
3. Does your company have the capability/experience of mobilizing/demobilizing e.g. ramp-up/draw down workforce, material deliveries and logistics, commuting, and equipment?
4. Is there a commercial pricing tool that could be utilized in the construction estimating effort?
| 5. Does your company have the capability/experience of using construction estimating software? | Comment by MANIBUSAN, TROY JOSEPH S CIV USAF PACAF 36 CONS/PKA: This language may need to be changed to the most updated software we are planning on using or having contractors tailor their proposal towards. |
| 6. Do you know of any other commercial pricing tools (Construction Software) that could be utilized in this effort? | Comment by TROY JOSEPH: Likewise with this language. May need to be changed to reflect latest estimating system that was previously RSMeans. |
7. What experience does your company have with tasks involved in the administration and management of Government construction projects e.g. progress schedules, payroll submission, labor compliance checks, pre/post construction conference, government inspections, final contract completion, etc.?
8. How will your company manage projects in Guam’s geographical installation?
9. How do you plan to coordinate administrative tasks with off-site personnel to maintain project schedule?
10. How will your company maintain an adequate Quality Assurance Program aimed to self-correct deficiencies?
11. Does your company believe that a single or multiple awards will satisfy this effort – Why?
12. Is there a disadvantage presented to a small business to compete successfully in this IDIQ effort?
13. Will your company be able to secure full bonding and insurance capacity?
14. 36 CONS is researching best acquisition strategies for selecting firms for a SABER contract. What is your opinion on a source selection approach and what would you suggest being an evaluation criteria/discriminator that can help differentiate the best companies?
15. Within the last three years, how many projects has your company successfully completed for:
| Projects |
| Description |
Projects less than $250,000.00
Projects more than $250,000.00
16. From your perspective, is there any risk (technical, schedule, and cost) associated with this effort that have not been captured? If so, what is it and how would you mitigate?
17. From your perspective, is there a way the Government can incentivize contractor’s quality, and schedule?
18. From your perspective, is there any other approach that can streamline the acquisition process and ensure competition is sustained throughout the duration of the contract?
19. Can you share any innovate alternative methods/processes to reduce cost and/or improve the acquisition?
20. The official SOW will be provided with the solicitation packet, as the draft SOW will change several times along the acquisition process. Is there anything in the SOW that needs Government attention? If so, what is it and what paragraph?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .