Attachment 2- QASP.pdf

PDF 123 KB Posted

Attached to
Cleveland NF - Carabaryl (Insecticide) Application
Solicitation number
127EAT24Q0009
Issued by

About this file

This document includes a quality assurance plan (QAP) and a solicitation for an insecticide application contract. The QAP outlines eight quality standards for general requirements, chemical formulation, mixing, application procedures, designation of trees, timing of spraying operations, and water quality measures. It specifies acceptable quality levels, means of measurement, and deductions or incentives depending on performance.

The solicitation seeks quotes to apply the contact insecticide Carbaryl to 287 coast live oak trees to prevent goldspotted oak borer attacks. Work will take place over approximately 12 days in May 2024 on the Palomar Ranger District of the Cleveland National Forest in California, with options for four additional years. Quotes are due by April 1, 2024. Evaluation criteria are technical capability, price, and past performance. The solicitation is a 100% small business set-aside under NAICS code 115310.

View the file

Other files

Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 2 Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)

Tasks Quality Standard

Acceptable Quality

Level

Means of Measurement

Deductions And

Incentives

8.1

General Requirements

100% of General Requirements meets 8.1 standards.

100% of General Requirements meets 8.1 standards.

Contractor inspection records and random verification by the Government.

Deductions – For quality below 90%, re-work at no cost to Government. For quality 90% with no rework, no payment will be made.

Poor performance rating.

Incentives (>100%) = Superior performance rating.

8.2

Chemical Formulation

100% of Chemical Formulation meets 8.2 standards.

100% of Chemical Formulation meets

8.2 standards.

Contractor inspection records and random verification by the Government.

Deductions – For quality below 90%, re-work at no cost to Government. For quality 90% with no rework, Incentives (100%) =

8.3

Mixing

100% of mixing meet 8.3 standards.

100% of mixing meet 8.3 standards.

Contractor inspection records and random verification by the Government.

Deductions – For quality below 90%, re-work at no cost to Government. For quality 90% with no rework,

8.4 Application

Procedures’

95% of Application Procedures meet

8.4 standards

90% of Application Procedures meet

8.4 standards

Contractor inspection records and random verification by the Government

Deductions – For quality below 90%, re-work at no cost to Government. For quality 90% with no rework, Incentives (>95%) = Superior performance rating

8.5 Designation of

Trees to be Treated

100% of Designation of Trees to be Treated meet

8.5 standards

95% of Designation of Trees to be Treated meet 8.5 standards

Contractor inspection records and random verification by the Government

Deductions – For quality below 95%, re-work at no cost to Government. For quality 95% with no rework,

8.6 Timing of Spray

Operations

95% of Timing of Spraying Operations meet

8.6 standards

90% of Timing of Spraying Operations meet

8.6 standards

Contractor inspection records and random verification by the Government

Deductions – For quality below 90%, re-work at no cost to Government. For quality 90% with no rework,

8.7 Other General

Measures to Protect Water Quality

95% of Other General Measures to Protect Water Quality meet 8.7 standards

90% of Other General Measures to Protect Water Quality meet 8.7 standards

Contractor inspection records and random verification by the Government

Deductions – For quality below 90%, re-work at no cost to Government. For quality 90% with no rework,

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .