Attachment 2- Proposal Submission Requirements Narcotics Search.pdf
PDF 193 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9127Q-21-R-0011
About this file
This solicitation requests proposals for technical instructional services for narcotics search warrant planning and execution courses I and II. The contractor shall provide a minimum 5-day, 40-hour course covering topics such as search warrant planning, equipment selection, communication methods, breaching techniques, clearing techniques, and evidence recovery. The courses shall be provided for up to 36 military and law enforcement personnel.
The base period of performance is 1 June 2021 through 31 May 2022. The government contemplates a firm fixed price contract with one base year and four 12-month option periods. Proposals are due by 4:00pm on 30 April 2021 and shall include volumes for technical approach, past performance, price, and certifications. The technical approach volume must include detailed course content that addresses the learning objectives. The past performance volume is limited to 25 pages and shall include descriptions of relevant prior contracts. Pricing shall be proposed for each CLIN on the proposal submission form. The Service Contract Act wage determination for Lauderdale County, MS applies. The government intends to award without discussions and evaluate proposals using the criteria in the solicitation.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
COMBINED SYNOPSIS/SOLICITATION W9127Q-20-R-0011
PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
A. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION
1. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Each volume shall be submitted electronically to LaShanda Areghan or Lisa Anguizola via e-mail (lashanda.d.areghan.civ@mail.mil or lisa.d.anguizola.civ@mail.mil ). Any portion of the proposal that is changed (as a result of negotiations or proposal revisions) should be annotated and dated. Each volume shall be clearly labeled with its Title and a copy number (e.g., copy 1 of 5). (indicate both proposal submission styles you want, electronic and hand delivered/mailed & both are due NLT 30 April 2021)
Each paragraph should be single spaced, and shall be separated by at least one blank line. A standard, 12-point minimum font size applies. Arial or New Times Roman fonts are required. Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no less than 8-point and may be produced in landscape mode.
The following volumes of material shall be submitted:
Volume Title Electronic
Copy Printed Copy
Maximum Pages
I
Technical
II
Past Performance
III
Cost/Price
No page limit
IV
Combined Synopsis/ Solicitation, Solicitation/ Contract/Order for Commercial Items (SF 1449), and Certifications / Representations
No page limit
NOTE: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated. Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government.
The contractor shall submit two (2) hard copies and one (1) electronic copy of its proposal. Proposals are due at 4:00 p.m. local (CST) time on 30 April 2021 at the USPFO for Mississippi, Purchasing and Contracting (P&C) Division, ATTN: LaShanda Areghan, 144 Military Drive, Flowood, MS 39232. Mailed proposals shall be sent using a trackable delivery method. Electronic proposals may be submitted via e-mail to LaShanda Areghan, lashanda.d.areghan.civ@mail.mil, and Lisa Anguizola, lisa.d.anguizola.civ@mail.mil . Facsimile proposals will not be accepted.
2. PROPOSAL FILES
Format. The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled. Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and Request for Proposal (RFP) mailto:lashanda.d.areghan.civ@mail.mil mailto:lisa.d.anguizola.civ@mail.mil mailto:lashanda.d.areghan.civ@mail.mil mailto:lisa.d.anguizola.civ@mail.mil number in the header and/or footer. A Table of Contents should be created using the Table of Content feature in MS Word. MS Word (doc) files shall use the following page setup parameters:
Margins – Top, Bottom, Left, Right – 1” Gutter – 0” From Edge – Header, Footer 0.5” Page Size, Width – 8.5” Page Size, Height – 11”
Offerors shall submit an original (1) and one (1) printed copies of complete proposals, PLUS one (1) electronic copy via e-mail. Printed copy submissions shall be provided in binders, with a separate divider for each Volume, and binder/divider/tab titles as indicated in the table below. All information that is included within the hard copy binders MUST also be included on the proposal that is submitted via e-mail. Offers shall clearly indicate the solicitation number on all volumes of the proposals. Failure to provide complete proposals in both printed copies and electronic copy NLT the proposal due date indicated, will render the proposal non-responsive and may not be considered for award.
Content Requirement. All information shall be confined to the appropriate file. The offeror shall confine submissions to essential matters, sufficient to define the proposal in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Each file of the proposal shall consist of a Table of Contents, Summary Section, and the Narrative discussion. The Summary Section shall contain a brief abstract of the file. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked. The following shall be included in the Narrative discussion:
Volume I – Technical Proposal
Offerors must ensure that no pricing information is displayed in Volume 1, Technical Proposal. The part of this volume shall include Course Overview and Performance Objectives, Course Agenda (broken down by day and hour), a breakdown of the curriculum, Slide Sets of PowerPoint, with presentation order that corresponds with the Course Agenda, Videos (if applicable), list of practical exercises, a copy of the pre-test and post-test, copy of the student handbook with reference material, materials and equipment provided by the contractor, and materials/equipment students must provide to participate in the course. The volume shall be organized in the following sections:
1. Section I: Technical Sub-factor A. Search Warrant Planning and Execution I Course Content- Course content will be evaluated based on inclusion of required course topics and the ability to achieve the objectives outlined within the PWS. Course content will be evaluated based on inclusion of required course topics and the ability to achieve the objectives outlined within the PWS. The part of this volume shall include Course Overview and Performance Objectives, Course Agenda (broken down by day and hour), a breakdown of the curriculum, Slide Sets of PowerPoint, with presentation order that corresponds with the Course Agenda, Videos (if applicable), list of practical exercises, a copy of the pre-test and post-test, copy of the student handbook with reference material, materials and equipment provided by the contractor, and materials/equipment students must provide to participate in the course. Failure to submit the course content information based on the technical sub-factors below, as required by the solicitation, will result in a negative technical rating for this factor. Failure to submit the course content information based on the technical sub-factors below, as required by the solicitation, will result in a negative technical rating for this factor. Provide a minimum 5-day, 40 hour course for Peer Support for up to 36 Military personnel, federal, state, and local agencies.
This course of instruction shall cover the following topics (learning objectives), at a minimum:
• Overview of Search Warrant Planning, Intelligence Collection with respect to Search Warrant Planning, Mission/Operation Orders, and Threat Matrix.
• Equipment selection needed for search warrant execution, tactical medic support needed for search warrant execution, and the type of personnel needed for search warrant planning and execution.
• Communication and Coordination Methods for Search Warrant Planning and Execution
• Overview of the different search warrant approaches, search warrant team movement, to include stacking, alternate breach points, and link points.
• Overview of breaching (manual, ballistic, and flash-bang) for executing high risk warrants.
• Overview of the different distractions, diversions (i.e. Brake and Rake), and ruses employed by search warrant targets.
• Overview of dynamic movement/flow, slow search options, and shield techniques when executing searches.
• Overview of Clearing techniques, Threat Assessment, and Commands/Communications during searches.
• Overview of Abort and Rally Points and Breach and Bunker Options for high risk search warrants.
• Overview of evidence recovery and documentation
• Critique, review, and training assessment for search warrants, planning, and execution.
2. Technical Sub-factor B Search Warrant Planning and Execution II Course Content. Course content will be evaluated based on inclusion of required course topics and the ability to achieve the objectives outlined within the PWS. Course content will be evaluated based on inclusion of required course topics and the ability to achieve the objectives outlined within the PWS. The part of this volume shall include Course Overview and Performance Objectives, Course Agenda (broken down by day and hour), a breakdown of the curriculum, Slide Sets of PowerPoint, with presentation order that corresponds with the Course Agenda, Videos (if applicable), list of practical exercises, a copy of the pre-test and post-test, copy of the student handbook with reference material, materials and equipment provided by the contractor, and materials/equipment students must provide to participate in the course. Failure to submit the course content information based on the technical sub-factors below, as required by the solicitation, will result in a negative technical rating for this factor. Failure to submit the course content information based on the technical sub-factors below, as required by the solicitation, will result in a negative technical rating for this factor. Provide a minimum 5-day, 40 hour course for Officer Involved Shootings for up to 36 Military personnel, federal, state, and local agencies
• Hands on Mission/Operation Orders and Intelligence Exercises for Search Warrant Planning and Execution
• Team rehearsal and skills assessment for executing search warrants for different scenarios.
• Practical exercises for multiple/simultaneous entries, link points, and alternate options during searches.
• Overview of Abort and Bunker and Officer Down Rescue during search warrants
• Overview of buy and bust operations
• Overview of vehicle assault scenarios during vehicle searches
• Overview of techniques for executing searches at elevated entries/stairways.
Technical Sub-factor C- Offeror/Instructor Qualifications Failure to submit offeror/instructor qualification based on the sub-factors below, and as stated in the PWS, will result in a negative technical rating for this factor. Note: Keep resumes for prospective instructor(s) to three (3) pages.
• The instructor(s) must be subject matter expert(s) on the techniques and processes of narcotic warrants operations. The instructor(s) must have extensive experience in full time law enforcement narcotics warrants execution, and be currently engaged in training law enforcement officers in the techniques and process of executing narcotic search warrants. The contractor must be an expert in the tactical law enforcement arena and have extensive experience in planning, executing, and serving drug search warrants.
• The contractor must have extensive experience in the design, development and delivery of narcotic warrant operations courses which must be certified under Peace Officers Standards and Training
(POST).
Volume II – Binder 2 – Past Performance – This volume shall contain past performance information regarding similar contracts. This volume shall not exceed 25 pages plus five pages for each major subcontractor, excluding Past Performance Questionnaire Forms. Offerors shall submit all Government and/or commercial contracts for the prime offeror and each major subcontractor in performance or awarded during the past three years, from the issue date of this RFP, which are relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation.
Relevant efforts are defined as services/efforts that are the same as or similar to the effort (as compared to North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 611699) required by the RFP. Data concerning the offeror shall be provided first, followed by each proposed major subcontractor, in alphabetical order. The Offeror shall also submit the written consent of its major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of its subcontractor’s past performance information to the Offeror. In addition, letters of commitment shall be included for all major subcontractors for their past performance to be considered.
This volume shall be organized into the following sections:
(1) Section 1 – Contract Descriptions. This section shall include the following information in thefollowing format.
(a) Contractor/Subcontractor place of performance, CAGE Code and DUNS Number. If the work was performed as a subcontractor, also provide the name of the prime contractor and Point of Contact (POC) within the prime contractor organization (name, and current address, e-mail address, and telephone and fax numbers).
(b) Government contracting activity, and current address, Procuring Contracting Officer’sname, e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers.
(c) Government’s technical representative/Contracting Officer’s Representative and currentemail address, telephone and fax numbers.
(d) Government contract administration activity and the Administrative Contracting Officer’sname, and current e-mail address, telephone and fax number.
(e) Government contract administration activity’s Pre-Award Monitor’s name, and current e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers.
(f) Contract Number and, in the case of Indefinite Delivery type contracts, GSA contracts, andBlanket Purchase Agreements, include Delivery Order Numbers.
(g) Contract Type (specific type such as Fixed-Price (FP), Cost Reimbursement (CR), Time &Material (T&M), etc.). In the case of Indefinite Delivery contracts, indicate specific type (Requirements, Definite Quantity, and Indefinite Quantity) and secondary contract type (FP, CR, T&M, etc.).
(h) Awarded price/cost.
(i) Final or projected final price/cost.
(j) Original delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion or work.
(k) Final or projected final, delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion of work.
(2) Section 2 – Performance. Offerors shall provide a specific narrative explanation of each contractlisted in Section 1, Contract Description, describing the objectives achieved and detailing how the effort is relevant to the requirement of this RFP.
(a) For any contracts that did not/do not meet original schedule or technical performance requirements, provide a brief explanation of the reason(s) for the shortcomings and any corrective action(s) taken to avoid recurrence. The offerors shall list each time the delivery schedule was revised and provide an explanation of why the revision was necessary. All Requests for Deviation and Requests for Waiver shall be addressed with respect to causes and corrective actions. The offerors shall also provide copy of any Cure Notices or Show Cause Letters received on each contract listed and a description of any corrective action implemented by the offeror or proposed subcontractor. The offerors shall indicate if any of thecontracts listed were terminated and the type and reasons for the termination.
(3) Past Performance Questionnaire. For all contracts identified in Section 1, Contract Descriptions, aPast Performance Questionnaire must be completed and submitted. The offeror shall complete Part Iof the Past Performance Questionnaire and e-mail the questionnaire to both the Government contracting activity and technical representative responsible for the past/current contract. The POCs shall be instructed to electronically complete Part II of the questionnaire and e-mail the entire questionnaire to this Contracting Office no later than the proposal due date, to lashanda.d.areghan.civ@mail.mil and lisa.d.anguziola.civ@mail.mil. The offeror shall e-mail to theContracting Officer a list of all the POCs who were sent a questionnaire. The Government must receive this list no later than the proposal due date. The POC List shall be submitted in Word for Windows Table Format to include the following fields:
Solicitation Number; Company Name;
Contract Number; Government Agency;
POC Last, First Name; POC Title;
POC Telephone Number; POC E-mail Address;Date E-Mailed to POC (month/day).
mailto:lashanda.d.areghan.civ@mail.mil mailto:lisa.d.anguziola.civ@mail.mil
The Government must receive a minimum of three (3) but no more than five (5) Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) to evaluate past performance. Offerors shall provide PPQs to companies/agencies for whom they have performed relevant (similar training content, audience type) services within the past three (3) years. Offeror shall complete the “Offeror” information on the PPQs before sending to their references. Although completed PPQs must be submitted by the referring company/agency directly to the Contract Specialist, offeror is responsible for following up to ensure that the minimum number of PPQs have been submitted prior to the proposal due date/time. Offerors are discouraged from providing points of contact with another contractors’ facility, i.e., in case an offeror (or one of his/her board members) is in a subcontract with another contractor who has submitted a proposal on the same requirement. Offerors shall provide and submit the prime contract number and all Governmental agency POCs in lieu of subcontract numbers or prime contract POCs insituations as described above.
Quality Assessment: The third aspect assesses the overall quality of the offeror’s past performance. Documented results from Past Performance Questionnaires, interviews, CPARS, and other sources form the support and basis for this assessment. The SSEB will review all past performance information collected to determine the quality of the offeror’s performance, general trends, usefulness of the information, and incorporate these into the performance confidence assessment. A separate quality assessment rating will not be made. The Quality of Services/Training will consider the following elementsnad subelements:
Course Design and Development
i. Course Curriculum/Agenda
ii. Quality of Instruction
iii. Course Materials/Handouts
iv. Course Benefit in Workplace
Scheduling
i. Adherence to Schedule
ii. Flexibility in Scheduling
Business Relations
i. Business/Contracting Relations
ii. Problem Resolution
iii. Process Improvement
iv. Lesson Learned Incorporation
v. Cooperative Behavior
vi. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction
vii. Responsiveness
Management of Key Personnel
i. Technical Knowledge in Course Subject Matter to include thoroughness, accuracy, and overall assement of contractor.
iv. Performance Confidence Assessment: Utilize the Performance Confidence Assessment (see Table 3 below) to select the most appropriate confidence level for each Offeror. Ensure the rationale for the conclusions reached are included.
Volume III – Binder 2 – Price:
The volume shall be organized into the following sections: Offeror shall provide a Firm Fixed Price (FFP), per course iteration, for each Contracting Line Item Number (CLIN) in the Combined Synopsis/Solicitation utilizing the form provided (Attachment 2B-Proposal Submission Form…). The FFP shall be inclusive of all labor, materials, equipment, mailing/shipping, and travel required to perform the training.
(2) Compliance. Failure to comply with the RFP requirements for Pricing information may result in anadverse assessment of an offeror’s proposal and reduce or eliminate its chance of being selected foraward. Offerors shall ensure that the information presented in this volume is consistent and correlateswith the information contained in the other proposal volumes. Also, the Offeror shall ensure that the information submitted in this volume is consistent with and fully supports the amounts set forth in theCombined Synopsis/Solicitation and SF 1449 and continuation sheets.
General Instructions. In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.402 and 15.403- 1, certified cost or pricing data are not required based on the fact that adequate competition is expected for this procurement. Information other than certified cost or pricing data may be provided in contractorformat providing that sufficient information is made available.
Information submitted shall be prepared following the instruction in FAR 15.403-5. If after receipt of proposals the Contracting Officer determines that there is insufficient information available to determine price reasonableness and noneof the exceptions at FAR 15.403-1 apply, the Offeror may be required to submit cost or pricing data.
Additionally, in the event that adequate competition is not obtained, the Contracting Officer may incorporate FAR 52.215-20 entitled, “Requirements for Cost or Pricing Data or Information Other Than Cost or Pricing Data,” into the solicitation and request a Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data.
There are no page limitations for this volume. Proposal information included in this volume which is not directly related to Cost will be disregarded.
Volume IV – Binder 2 – Combine Synopsis / Solicitation Documentation and Representations / Certifications Certifications and Representations – Each offeror shall complete (fill-in and signatures) the solicitation sections for all items that are required, such as the Representations and Certifications from the solicitation provisions section. Additionally, Offeror shall complete all representations andcertifications within their System for Award Management (SAM) profile at http://www.sam.gov. Anyprovisions listed within the “Full Text Provisions and Clauses” document that are not completed within SAM must be printed, completed and included with the proposal.
http://www.sam.gov/
| Volume II – Binder 2 – Past Performance – |
| Volume III – Binder 2 – Price: |
| Volume IV – Binder 2 – Combine Synopsis / Solicitation Documentation and Representations / Certifications |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .