ATTACHMENT 2 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ).docx

ATTACHMENT 2: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

SOLICITATION NUMBER: W912D0-26-R-A008 PROJECT TITLE: Cold Weather Pumping and Thawing of Latrines – Fort Wainwright, AK

PART I - INSTRUCTIONS TO THE OFFEROR

The Offeror must complete Section A of this questionnaire and forward it to each of their past performance references (clients/customers). The Offeror shall instruct their references to complete Sections B and C and return the form directly to the Government via email.

PART II - INSTRUCTIONS TO THE EVALUATOR

The contractor listed below has submitted a proposal to the 413th Contracting Support Brigade, Regional Contracting Office - Alaska (RCO-AK) to perform critical, cold-weather sanitation services at Fort Wainwright, Alaska.

Please complete Sections B and C of this questionnaire based on your experience with this contractor. Your candid feedback is vital to our source selection process.

SUBMISSION DIRECTIVE: Please return this completed questionnaire directly to the Contracting Officer Jeffery.a.morgan69.civ@army.mil and Contract Specialist richard.f.smith3.civ@army.mil via email no later than 23 July 2026 1:00PM Alaska Standard Time.

· DO NOT return this form to the contractor being evaluated.

· DO NOT send this form to any address other than the email listed above.

SECTION A: CONTRACT PROFILE (To be completed by the Offeror)

SECTION B: EVALUATOR PROFILE (To be completed by the Reference Evaluator)

SECTION C: PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (To be completed by the Reference Evaluator) Please evaluate the contractor’s performance on the contract listed in Section A using the adjectival ratings defined below:

· Exceptional (E): Performance met all contract requirements and significantly exceeded many to the Government's/client's benefit.

· Very Good (V): Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the Government's/client's benefit.

· Satisfactory (S): Performance met all contract requirements.

· Marginal (M): Performance did not meet some contractual requirements; corrective action was required.

· Unsatisfactory (U): Performance did not meet most contractual requirements; serious deficiencies occurred.

· Not Applicable (N): No basis of evaluation/no experience with the contractor in this area.

Performance Rating Matrix

1. Quality of ServiceDid the contractor perform pumping and thawing services in accordance with established safety, environmental, and cleanliness standards?

2. Operations in Extreme EnvironmentsHow effectively did the contractor’s equipment and personnel operate in sustained sub-zero temperatures (below 0°F to -50°F)?

3. Schedule & ResponsivenessDid the contractor adhere to scheduled routes? Did they meet emergency/short-notice mobilization timelines (e.g., 4-hour response)?

4. Equipment Management & RedundancyDid the contractor maintain reliable pumping and thawing gear? Were backup assets quickly deployed in the event of a breakdown?

5. Business Relations & ManagementWas the contractor professional, cooperative, and proactive in solving issues? Were invoices accurate and timely?

6. Environmental ComplianceDid the contractor safely handle and transport human waste without environmental spills or regulatory violations?

Overall Recommendation Would you award another contract to this contractor for similar services in an extreme cold-weather environment?

[ ] Yes | [ ] No If "No", please provide a brief justification:

Evaluator Signature: ____________________________________ Date: ________________________