Attachment 2 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE SOLICITATION #W81XWH-21-R-0071

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS (To be completed by a Government POC)

The Government POC/addressee is requested to answer the following questions by placing a check mark in the box that best describes the quality of the contractor’s performance in relation to the question being asked. For any assigned descriptions of “considerably surpassed” or “did not meet/less than minimum”, please provide additional comments supporting these assessments. For any assessment of a “did not meet/less than minimum”, please indicate in the comments whether or not the contractor has been previously advised that his performance had not met minimum requirements. If so, please attach the substantiating documentation.

QUALITY OF PRODUCTS/SERVICES

1. To what extent does/did the contractor meet the technical objectives/requirements of the contract/task order?

Considerably surpassed minimum technical objectives/requirements

Generally exceeded minimum technical objectives/requirements

Met minimum technical objectives/requirements

Did not meet minimum technical objectives/requirements

Comments:_________________________________________________________________________________

2. How responsive is/was the contractor in responding to changes in technical direction and/or in the technical environment in which the effort was performed?

Considerably surpassed Government expectations

Generally exceeded Government expectations

Met Government expectations

Did not meet Government expectations

3. To what extent does/did the contractor identify and proactively mitigate technical risks associated with the required effort without Government intervention?

4. How effective was the contractor in the timely resolution of technical problems without Government intervention?

5. What is/was the level of the contractor’s technical personnel qualifications in relation to the minimum qualification requirements of the contract/task order? If minimum qualifications were not required, what is/was the level of qualifications in relation to that which would be expected to successfully achieve technical objectives?

Considerably surpassed minimum/expected qualifications

Generally exceeded minimum/expected qualifications

Met minimum/expected qualifications

Less than minimum/expected qualifications

SCHEDULE ADHERENCE

1. To what extent does/did the contractor adhere to original contract/task order delivery schedules, to include the delivery of products/services as well as deliverable reports?

Considerably surpassed required delivery schedules (routinely delivered ahead of schedule)

Generally exceeded required delivery schedules (occasionally delivered ahead of schedule)

Met Delivery Schedules

Did Not Meet Required Delivery Schedules

2. To what extent does/did the contractor identify and proactively mitigate schedule risks associated with the required effort without Government intervention?

CONDUCT OF BUSINESS RELATIONS

1. How responsive is/was the contractor’s managerial personnel in responding to Government queries and requests?

2. How effective is/was the contractor’s managerial personnel in communicating/interfacing with Government personnel?

3. To what extent does/did the contractor demonstrate initiative in teaming and/or collaborating with the

Government customer, other contractors, or similar entities to promote synergy and innovation?

EFFECTIVENESS OF COST/PRICE AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

1. How effective is/was the contractor in accurately forecasting and allocating sufficient resources, including the appropriate types and numbers of qualified personnel, to successfully meet the technical objectives of the contract/task order in a timely manner?

Considerably surpassed Government expectations; personnel retention rates were maintained at

95% or better.

Generally exceeded Government expectations; personnel retention rates were maintained at 90% or better.

Met Government expectations; personnel retention rates were maintained at 80% or better.

Did not meet Government expectations; personnel retention rates were maintained at less than

80% (see Section 2E, Question 1 below)

2. How effective is/was the contractor in adhering to original cost/price and other resource estimates during the course of contract/task order performance?

Considerably surpassed Government expectations. For cost-reimbursement type contracts, actual cost of performance was maintained within original cost estimates.

Generally exceeded Government expectations. For cost-reimbursement type contracts, actual cost of performance was maintained within 105% of original cost estimates.

Met Government expectations. For cost-reimbursement type contracts, actual cost of task order performance was maintained within 110% of original cost estimates.

Did not meet Government expectations. For cost-reimbursement type contracts, actual cost of task order performance exceeded 110% of original cost estimate. (see Section 2E, Question 1 below)

3. How effective is/was the contractor in meeting cost/performance reporting requirements in terms of accuracy and content?

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

1. If the contractor experienced cost overruns under this contract/task order, or required scope and/or ceiling increases as a result of a failure to adequately manage the effort, provide additional information below:

2. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience? Yes No

a. If yes, termination was for: Default Convenience

b. If yes, explain basis for default

Comments:____________________________________________________________________

3. Are there any pending terminations? Yes No

If yes, explain and indicate the status:

4. Identify the contractor’s overall strengths and weaknesses:

5. Additional information not included above (attach additional page if necessary):

RESPONDENT INFORMATION (To be completed by Government POC)

EVALUATED BY: ________________________________________________________

Name and Title: ___________________________________________________________

Organization: _____________________________________________________________

Signature: ________________________________________________________________