Attachment 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Design-Build Upgrade Vehicle Assembly Building 325 Ton Crane at Kennedy Space Center, FL
- Solicitation number
- 80KSC021R0006
About this file
This solicitation is for the design-build upgrade of controls, power distribution systems, actuation and braking systems on a 325-ton overhead bridge crane at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's John F. Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The scope of work includes replacing hoist and travel brakes, the crane power feed rail, emergency stop systems, operator interfaces, hook rotation systems, weighing systems, motor controls, programmable logic controllers, tachometers, encoders, uninterruptible power supplies and power distribution systems. Interested parties must be screened by the Defense Logistics Agency Joint Certification Program prior to receiving controlled documents. This two-phase solicitation seeks information from prospective offerors in Phase 1 to downselect to five highly qualified contractors to participate in Phase 2. The total estimated cost is between $1 million and $5 million and this will be a total small business set-aside with a North American Industry Classification System code of 333923 and 1,250 employee size standard.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 03 signed.pdf | ||
| Amendment 02 signed.pdf | ||
| Amendment 01 signed.pdf | ||
| 80KSC021R0006 - Phase 1 RFP.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Pre-Proposal Inquiry Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 4 - Annual Representations and Certifications.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NASA/KSC SOLICITATION 80KSC021R0006
ATTACHMENT 2
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Upgrade VAB 325 Ton Crane, Kennedy Space Center, Florida.
NASA Kennedy Space Center’s solicitation requires offerors to provide this Past Performance Questionnaire to customers to complete and return to NASA. Past performance raters are requested to submit the completed questionnaires to the contracting officer identified below via e-mail, to arrive not later than the proposal submission date.
Completed questionnaires should be sent to:
| Name: | Anthony M. Caruvana | |
| Email: | Anthony.M.Caruvana@nasa.gov |
Raters are requested to complete the questionnaire forms as written since altered or substituted questionnaires may not adequately address the information NASA will be evaluating.
SECTION I. THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR
Name of Contractor Being Evaluated: _______________________________________
Name of Project and Contract/Order Number: ________________________________
Period of Contract Performance (dates): _____________________________________
Current Contract Completion Percentage if Project is not done:____________________
Place of Contract Performance: ____________________________________________
Contract Value at Award: _________________________________________________
Contract Value at Completion or Current Contract Amount: ______________________
Contract Status (Prime or Subcontract?): _____________________________________
Point of Contact: (Rater) Name/Address/Office Phone Number/E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY THE RATER
(THIS QUESTIONNAIRE, WHEN COMPLETED, SHALL NOT BE DISCLOSED TO ANYONE OUTSIDE THE GOVERNMENT)
Name of Contractor Being Evaluated: _____________________________________________
Name of Project and Contract/Order Number: ______________________________________
Period of Contract Performance (dates): __________________________________________
Place of Contract Performance: _________________________________________________
Contract Value at Award: ______________________________________________________
Contract Value at Completion or Current Contract Amount: ____________________________
Contractor’s Status (Prime or Subcontractor?): _____________________________________
Percentage and Dollar Value of Work Performed by the Contractor:
Dates of Rater’s Involvement in Program/Contract: _________________________________
Brief Description of Work Performed: ___________________________________________________________________________
Point of Contact: (Rater) Name/Address/Office Phone Number/E-Mail Address: ___________________________________________________________________________
RATING DEFINITIONS:
On a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being unsatisfactory and 5 being exceptional, please rate the contractor on the past performance areas included in this questionnaire. A rating of N/A should be used if the question is not applicable or the answer is unknown. Space is provided for any additional comments raters may want to provide. The definitions associated with the 1 to 5 ratings are provided below:
1. UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does (did) not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely (did not occur). The contractual performance contains (contained) serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear ineffective (were ineffective).
2. MARGINAL: Performance does (did) not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects (reflected) serious problem(s) for which the contractor has not yet identified acceptable corrective actions (did not provide acceptable corrective actions).
3. SATISFACTORY: Performance meets (met) contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects (reflected) some minor problems. Corrective actions being taken by the contractor appear to be effective (Corrective actions taken were effective).
4. VERY GOOD: Performance meets (met) contractual requirements and exceeds (exceeded) some of the Government’s expectations. The contractual performance reflects (reflected) some minor problems and corrective actions being taken by the contractor appear to be effective (Corrective actions taken were effective).
5. EXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets (met) contractual requirements and exceeds (exceeded) many of the Government’s expectations. The contractual performance reflects (reflected) few minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be highly effective (corrective actions taken were effective).
N/A: Not applicable or rater has not observed performance in this area.
CONTRACTOR’S TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS
1. The effectiveness of the Contractor’s overall project management ability (including but not limited to project managers, quality control managers, trade integrators, safety managers, and superintendents); labor (skilled and unskilled workers); equipment; supplies; tools; and financial resources to successfully perform, provide contract deliverables and complete work in a safe and timely manner.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
Comments:
2. The Contractor’s ability to provide immediate and effective contractor management attention at the job site and partner with the owner to resolve technical and schedule issues.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
Comments:
3. The Contractor’s ability to provide quality engineering shop drawings and accurate and complete as-built documentation.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
Comments:
4. The Contractor’s ability to complete work scope within the approved schedule including any customer driven changes.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
Comments:
5. The Contractor’s ability to build, upgrade, and rehabilitate overhead bridge cranes.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
Comments:
6. The Contractor’s ability to create, maintain, and comply with a safety and health program with visible management control and involvement during the duration of the contract.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
Comments:
7. Did the Contractor comply with Department of Labor requirements and resolution of reported labor violations/discrepancies.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
Comments:
8. Did the Contractor provide prompt payment of employees, subcontractors, and suppliers for services performed under the contract.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
Comments:
CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL CONTRACT PERFORMANCE
1. Would you select this contractor again? (Please circle Yes or No)
| Yes |
| No |
Comments:
THIS COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE WILL NOT BE DISCLOSED TO ANYONE OUTSIDE THE GOVERNMENT. THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO COMPLETE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .