Attachment 2_ Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
NEED3000-20-01108 Support Services for UAS Ice Retrieval Calibration Validation Experiment Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
NEED30002001108
Issued by
Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to NEED3000-20-01108 Support Services for UAS Ice Retrieval Calibration Validation Experiment, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment 3_Past Performance Reference Information.docx DOCX document
RFP_NEED3000-20-01108 - Support Services for UAS Ice Retrieval Calibration Validation Experiment.pdf PDF
Attachment 1_Price Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT #3

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Support Services for the UAS Sea Ice Retrieval for Calibration/Validation Experiment

REQUEST FOR QUOTE

<This grey header section is to be completed by the offeror and provided to the reference with a description of the project and instructions to submit the completed questionnaire directly to the government contacts identified in Section IV. >

Contractor Being Evaluated:

If different from the “Contractor Being Evaluated,” the Prime Contractor that’s quoting on whose behalf this is being submitted:

Contract Number / Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Name/Title:

Contract Period of Performance:

Contract Description:

Rater Name:

Rater Telephone:

Rater E-Mail Address:

Rater’s Role in Relation to the Contract (program/project manager, contracting officer, major end user, etc.):

RATINGS DEFINITIONS

Adjectival Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Neutral
No relevant past performance information is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that a past performance rating cannot be assigned.

INDEX

Section I – Ratings Section II – Additional Narrative Justification Section III – Signature of Rater Section IV – Return Instructions Section V – Contact Information

Please provide any relevant information to support the ratings provided.

<Note: When completing this questionnaire by e-mail, please do not use a color, such as red, to select the rating in section I of this questionnaire. Color fonts do not show well when printed. Just bold it, underline it, or increase the font size in black.>

Section I

Contractor Performance

1. How would you rate the quality of the contractor’s products/services provided (e.g. compliance with contract requirements and accuracy of work)?

Supporting narrative: <see above criteria>

Response (Circle One)

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Neutral

2. How would you rate the contractor’s timeliness/schedule (e.g. met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical direction, on-time completion, wrap-up and contract administration, no liquidated damages assessed)?

Exceptional

Very Good Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Neutral

3. How would you rate the performance of the contractor’s ability to control costs (cost control)?

Exceptional

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Neutral

4. How would you rate the contractor’s management and business relations (e.g. effective management, reasonable/cooperative behavior, flexible, effective recommended solutions, business-like concerns for Government’s interests)?

How would you rate the contractor’s ability to meet special needs (such as contingency support, innovative solutions, etc) for delivery requirements?

Exceptional

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Neutral

5. If applicable, how would you rate the contractor’s ability to effectively utilize manage, coordinate, and integrate subcontractors?

Exceptional

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Neutral

6. How would you rate the contractor’s regulatory compliance with applicable regulations during performance of this contract or order?

Exceptional

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Neutral

7. Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to perform in accordance with this contract/order being rated, I (‘would’ or ‘would not’) recommend them for similar requirements in the future.

Would Not Recommend

Would Recommend

Section II

Additional Supporting Narrative, if required: <Include the number of the question to which this supporting narrative applies. Additional pages may be used.>

Section III

Signature of rater: _______________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ <Signature of the rater is required is not required if sent via e-mail directly from rater to the NOAA CO and CS.>

Section IV

Return the completed questionnaire via e-mail to both: MATTHEW.ROBERTSON@NOAA.GOV and LORNA.FINN@NOAA.GOV

Please return the completed questionnaire by no later than 4:00PM Eastern Time on September 9, 2020

Section V

For any questions pertaining to the questionnaire, please contact: Lorna Finn, Contract Specialist, by email at Lorna.Finn@noaa.gov and Matthew.Robertson@NOAA.Gov, or by phone at (301) 628-1423

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .