Attachment 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire Attachment 2.docx
DOCX document 22 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C25624Q0721
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire that is part of a federal contract solicitation. The solicitation is for STERIS equipment preventative and corrective maintenance services for the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center in Houston, TX. The Contracting Officer is requesting reference information on the past performance of the offeror, including overall quality and satisfaction, delivery performance, quality of service, problem resolution, and personnel quality. The reference is asked to rate the offeror's performance on a scale of 1 to 5 and provide comments. The reference is also asked to indicate if any cure notices, show cause letters, or terminations have occurred, and whether they would award the offeror another contract. The solicitation has a NAICS code of 811210, a small business size standard of $34.0M, and is a 100% Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business set-aside. The period of performance and contract value are requested. Responses to the questionnaire are due to the Contracting Officer by April 30, 2024 at 10:00 am CST.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C25624Q0721.docx | DOCX document | |
| Project Experience Attachment 1.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
36C25624Q0721 - Attachment 2
ATTACHMENT 2
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
REFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS: The Michael E. Debakey VA Medical Center is considering the Quoter listed below for award of a VA contract. Your comments would be appreciated regarding this firm’s past performance. The intent of this form is to evaluate the quoter’s services. Your comments are considered Source Selection Sensitive; therefore, you are advised that the Federal Acquisition Regulation prohibits the release of the names of individuals providing reference information about Quoter’s past performance. This survey should be completed by an evaluator with sufficient familiarity of the quoter’s performance and returned to the contracting office by the evaluator no later than April 30, 2024 (10:00 am, CST) the closing date of the solicitation by e-mail to arlene.blade@va.gov..
Include the solicitation number on the subject line of all e-mails. Solicitation Number: 36C25624Q0721
Offeror’s Name: ____________________Offeror’s e-mail: __________________________________
Request for Proposal:_________________________________________________________________
Name of Person Completing the Evaluation:
Telephone: E-mail: ______
Title:
Company/Organization:
Please rate the offeror in each of the following areas. Note: there is room for comments where you deem remarks would be helpful to our evaluation.
· Not Applicable: N/A
· 1: Performance clearly below the contract performance standard or requirement
| · 2: | Performance occasionally does not meet minimum contract performance standard or requirement |
| · 3: | Performance that meets the minimum contract performance standard or requirement |
| · 4: | Performance that meets and occasionally exceeds the contract performance standard or requirement |
| · 5: | Performance that almost always exceeds the contract performance standard or requirement |
| 1. Overall quality/satisfaction |
| N/A |_| |
| 1 |_| |
| 2 |_| |
| 3 |_| |
| 4 |_| |
| 5 |_| |
Overall satisfaction with the Offeror’s performance. Would you (the reference) choose to work with this offeror again?
| 2. Delivery performance |
| N/A |_| |
| 1 |_| |
| 2 |_| |
| 3 |_| |
| 4 |_| |
| 5 |_| |
Delivery performance includes delivery consistency, on time performance, and flexibility in responding to emerging issues and implementing required solutions.
| 3. Satisfaction with the quality of service delivered |
| N/A |_| |
| 1 |_| |
| 2 |_| |
| 3 |_| |
| 4 |_| |
| 5 |_| |
Rate the effectiveness and applicability of the plans and strategies delivered and the actual implementation of those.
| 4. Satisfaction with problem resolution |
| N/A |_| |
| 1 |_| |
| 2 |_| |
| 3 |_| |
| 4 |_| |
| 5 |_| |
This includes the offeror’s ability to solve problems, the speed in which they handle problems, and their effective delivery of resolutions.
| 5. Satisfaction with the quality of contractor personnel |
| N/A |_| |
| 1 |_| |
| 2 |_| |
| 3 |_| |
| 4 |_| |
| 5 |_| |
Rate the quality of the contractor’s staff in executing the project work scope.
6. Have you issued a cure notice, show cause notice, suspension of progress payments or other letters directing the correction of a performance problem in the past 3 years?
|_| Yes |_| No If Yes, please explain.
7. Have you terminated this contractor for default within the past 3 years, or are there any pending termination actions?
|_| Yes |_| No If Yes, please explain.
8. Based on the offeror’s overall performance, would you award them another contract?
|_| Yes |_| No If No, please explain.
9. Have you discussed any adverse past performance problems with the Offeror and given them an opportunity to comment?
|_| Yes |_| No Please explain.
10. Do you file past performance information in a database that the Contracting Officer may search?
|_| Yes |_| No Please explain.
11. If the contract had options, were those options exercised?
|_| Yes |_| No Please explain.
12. List the dates of the contract period of performance (when were services provided)?
13. What was the dollar value of the contract performed by the offeror?
14. Provide a brief description of the services provided by the offeror for this contract.
Please attach any past performance database reports or other material you deem appropriate to a full understanding of the Offeror’s past performance by the evaluator.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .