ATTACHMENT 2 PAST PERFORMACE QUESTIONAIRE.docx

DOCX document 27 KB Posted

Attached to
S222--598-25-3-8723-0040 Title of Project: Hazardous and Nonhazardous waste removal & disposal
Solicitation number
36C25625Q0323
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template for solicitation 36C25625Q0323, which must be submitted by 12PM CT on February 1, 2025. The questionnaire is designed to evaluate contractors' past performance on previous contracts through ratings in four key areas: Quality of Service, Timeliness of Performance, Business Relations, and Management of Key Personnel.

The rating scale includes six levels: Outstanding (High Confidence), Excellent (Significant Confidence), Satisfactory (Confidence), Neutral (Unknown Confidence), Marginal (Little Confidence), and Unsatisfactory (No Confidence). Respondents must provide basic contract information including contract number, type, award date, period of performance, total dollar amount, and scope description. The questionnaire should be returned to arlene.blade@va.gov and requires detailed evaluations of 24 specific performance criteria across the four main evaluation areas, along with space for written remarks about the contractor's overall performance.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
ATTACHMENT 1 - Items List.docx DOCX document
36C25625Q0323.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT 3 LIST OF PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCES.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

36C25625Q0323 RETURN BY 12PM, CT, ON FEBRUARY 1, 2025

INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION (Information on the Company that you are evaluating)

A. Contractor Name:

B. Contractor's Address:

C. Point of Contact:

CONTRACT INFORMATION:

IN ORDER TO DETERMINE RELEVANCY AND RECENCY, THE FOLLOWING DATA IS REQUIRED. FAILURE TO PROVIDE THIS INFORMANTION MAY RENDER THE PROPOSAL UNRESPONSIVE.

A. CONTRACT NUMBER:

B. CONTRACT TYPE:

C. AWARD DATE:

D. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

E. TOTAL CONTRACT DOLLAR AMOUNT INCLUDING

OPTIONS, IF APPLICABLE: $________________

F. SCOPE: PLEASE INCLUDE A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES PERFORMED TO DETERMINE SIMILARITY OF SCOPE.

1. Please complete this questionnaire based on the following guidance:

a. For each question please circle one rating as defined below. Please circle "N" if you are unable to provide a rating for an area. Assessments should reflect only contractor liable performance. The following is a definition of the scoring levels:

Rating

Definition

Outstanding (O)
High Confidence
Based on the offeror’s performance record, no doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Excellent (E)
Significant Confidence
Based on the offeror’s performance record, essentially no doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Satisfactory (S)
Confidence
Based on the offeror’s performance record, little doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Neutral (N)
Unknown Confidence
No performance record identifiable (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iii) and (iv)).
Marginal (M)
Little Confidence
Based on the offeror’s performance record, substantial doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Changes to the offeror’s existing processes may be necessary in order to achieve contract requirements.
Unsatisfactory (U)
No Confidence
Based on the offeror’s performance record, extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

b. Handwritten remarks are encouraged. Space is provided at the end of the survey. If more space is needed, please provide information of a separate sheet of paper.

c. You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the contractor's performance with the judgment of others in your organization. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the identified program, we solicit your comments on other contracts/programs that your activity has with this offeror.

2. Please return completed questionnaire by 12PM CT on February 1, 2025, via e-mail to:

EMAIL (PREFERRED): arlene.blade@va.gov

QUALITY OF SERVICE

1. Contractor's compliance with contractual terms and conditions. O E S N M U

2. Quality of contractor furnished reports/deliverables. O E S N M U

3. Overall rating of contractor's commitment to providing quality service. O E S N M U

4. Contractors ability to meet standards specified for performance. O E S N M U

5. Overall rating of contractor's quality of service. O E S N M U

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE

1. Contractor's ability to meet specific response times and scheduled O E S N M U time frames for completion of specific tasks.

2. Contractor's responsiveness/timeliness for providing administrative O E S N M U reports/documents required by the contract.

3. Contractor's timeliness in responding to emergency service requirements. O E S N M U

4. Overall rating of contractor's responsiveness/timeliness. O E S N M U

BUSINESS RELATIONS

1. Contractor's ability to identify problems and potential problems and O E S N M U promptly notify the Contracting Officer.

2. Contractor's ability to correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential O E S N M U problems in a timely manner.

3. Contractor's willingness to improve and correct noncompliance issues O E S N M U or concerns.

4. Extent to which the contractor has demonstrated reasonable and cooperative O E S N M U behavior.

5. Contractor's ability to use effective approaches and provide technical O E S N M U expertise and resources to solve contract problems.

6. Contractor's working relationship with the Contracting Officer, O E S N M U quality assurance personnel, and customers.

7. Contractor's flexibility in satisfying the requirements of its customers. O E S N M U

8. Extent to which the contractor provided prompt and courteous O E S N M U service when responding to customer complaint.

9. Overall rating of customer satisfaction. O E S N M U

10. Overall rating of business relations. O E S N M U

MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

1. Contractor's ability to select and retain cooperative and effective O E S N M U key personnel, such as the contract manager and quality control personnel.

2. Extent key personnel were knowledgeable about contractual O E S N M U requirements.

3. Contractor's ability to meet appropriate staffing levels with qualified O E S N M U personnel in order to provide required services.

4. Contractor's ability to effectively manage subcontracts. O E S N M U

5. Overall rating of contractor's management of key personnel. O E S N M U

REMARKS CONCERNING CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL PERFORMANCE:

RESPONDENT’S PRINTED NAME: ____________________________________________

RESPONDENT’S TITLE: _____________________________________________________

RESPONDENT’S SIGNATURE: ________________________________________________

RESPONDENT’S PHONE NUMBER: ___________________________________________

THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO COMPLETE AND RETURN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE!

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .