ATTACHMENT 2 PAST PERFORMACE QUESTIONAIRE.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- J056--Operating Room Floor Repairs Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C25625Q1224
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity related to an Operating Room Floor Repair project at the Gulf Coast Veterans Health Care System. The questionnaire is part of solicitation 36C25625Q1224 and was to be returned by 10:59 PM CST on July 7, 2020, to Angela Kennedy at the VA's Network Contracting Office in Biloxi, Mississippi.
The questionnaire provides a comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing a contractor's performance across five key areas: Quality of Service, Timeliness of Performance, Business Relations, Management of Key Personnel, and Overall Performance. It uses a rating scale from Outstanding (O) to Unsatisfactory (U), with neutral (N) options, to help the VA evaluate a contractor's past performance, capability, and reliability. The document is marked "For Official Use Only" and requires detailed feedback on specific performance metrics such as contractual compliance, responsiveness, problem-solving abilities, personnel management, and customer satisfaction.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C25625Q1224 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25625Q1224.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION.docx | DOCX document | |
| FLOOR PLAN - BLDG 30 OPERATING ROOMS.pdf | ||
| Harrison County WD 2015-5147 Rev26.txt | TXT text file | |
| ATTACHMENT 1 LIST OF PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCES.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25625Q1224.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 8 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
36C256-21-U-0019 RETURN BY 10:59PM, CST, ON JULY 7, 2020
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
CONTRACTOR INFORMATION (Information on the Company that you are evaluating)
A. Contractor Name:
B. Contractor's Address:
C. Point of Contact:
CONTRACT INFORMATION:
IN ORDER TO DETERMINE RELEVANCY AND RECENCY, THE FOLLOWING DATA IS REQUIRED. FAILURE TO PROVIDE THIS INFORMANTION MAY RENDER THE PROPOSAL UNRESPONSIVE.
A. CONTRACT NUMBER:
B. CONTRACT TYPE:
C. AWARD DATE:
D. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:
E. TOTAL CONTRACT DOLLAR AMOUNT INCLUDING
OPTIONS, IF APPLICABLE: $________________
F. SCOPE: PLEASE INCLUDE A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES PERFORMED TO DETERMINE SIMILARITY OF SCOPE.
1. Please complete this questionnaire based on the following guidance:
a. For each question please circle one rating as defined below. Please circle "N" if you are unable to provide a rating for an area. Assessments should reflect only contractor liable performance. The following is a definition of the scoring levels:
Rating
Definition
| Outstanding (O) |
| High Confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, no doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Excellent (E) |
| Significant Confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, essentially no doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Satisfactory (S) |
| Confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, little doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Neutral (N) |
| Unknown Confidence |
| No performance record identifiable (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iii) and (iv)). |
| Marginal (M) |
| Little Confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, substantial doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Changes to the offeror’s existing processes may be necessary in order to achieve contract requirements. |
| Unsatisfactory (U) |
| No Confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
b. Handwritten remarks are encouraged. Space is provided at the end of the survey. If more space is needed, please provide information of a separate sheet of paper.
c. You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the contractor's performance with the judgment of others in your organization. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the identified program, we solicit your comments on other contracts/programs that your activity has with this offeror.
2. Please return completed questionnaire by 10:59PM CST on July 7, 2020 by fax or e-mail to:
GULF COAST VETERANS HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
NETWORK CONTRACTING OFFICE (NCO) 16
ATTN: ANGELA KENNEDY
400 VETERANS AVENUE, BLDG T-102
BILOXI MS 39531
EMAIL (PREFERRED): angela.kennedy2@va.gov
QUALITY OF SERVICE
1. Contractor's compliance with contractual terms and conditions. O E S N M U
2. Quality of contractor furnished reports/deliverables. O E S N M U
3. Overall rating of contractor's commitment to providing quality service. O E S N M U
4. Contractors ability to meet standards specified for performance. O E S N M U
5. Overall rating of contractor's quality of service. O E S N M U
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
1. Contractor's ability to meet specific response times and scheduled O E S N M U time frames for completion of specific tasks.
2. Contractor's responsiveness/timeliness for providing administrative O E S N M U reports/documents required by the contract.
3. Contractor's timeliness in responding to emergency service requirements. O E S N M U
4. Overall rating of contractor's responsiveness/timeliness. O E S N M U
BUSINESS RELATIONS
1. Contractor's ability to identify problems and potential problems and O E S N M U promptly notify the Contracting Officer.
2. Contractor's ability to correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential O E S N M U problems in a timely manner.
3. Contractor's willingness to improve and correct noncompliance issues O E S N M U or concerns.
4. Extent to which the contractor has demonstrated reasonable and cooperative O E S N M U behavior.
5. Contractor's ability to use effective approaches and provide technical O E S N M U expertise and resources to solve contract problems.
6. Contractor's working relationship with the Contracting Officer, O E S N M U quality assurance personnel, and customers.
7. Contractor's flexibility in satisfying the requirements of its customers. O E S N M U
8. Extent to which the contractor provided prompt and courteous O E S N M U service when responding to customer complaint.
9. Overall rating of customer satisfaction. O E S N M U
10. Overall rating of business relations. O E S N M U
MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL
1. Contractor's ability to select and retain cooperative and effective O E S N M U key personnel, such as the contract manager and quality control personnel.
2. Extent key personnel were knowledgeable about contractual O E S N M U requirements.
3. Contractor's ability to meet appropriate staffing levels with qualified O E S N M U personnel in order to provide required services.
4. Contractor's ability to effectively manage subcontracts. O E S N M U
5. Overall rating of contractor's management of key personnel. O E S N M U
REMARKS CONCERNING CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
RESPONDENT’S PRINTED NAME: ____________________________________________
RESPONDENT’S TITLE: _____________________________________________________
RESPONDENT’S SIGNATURE: ________________________________________________
RESPONDENT’S PHONE NUMBER: ___________________________________________
THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO COMPLETE AND RETURN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE!
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .