Attachment 2 - List of Exhibits 1-9.pdf

PDF 11 MB Posted

Attached to
Stocking Plots/Stand Exams - Lowman Ranger District/Clear Creek, ID
Solicitation number
1240LR23P0080
Issued by

About this file

This document provides details for a federal contract opportunity with the Department of Agriculture Forest Service. Solicitation number 1240LR23P0080 requests proposals for stocking plots and stand exams on the Lowman Ranger District in Clear Creek, Idaho. Interested vendors should submit proposals by the dates listed in the attached exhibits, which include specifications for the required services, response deadlines, and award timelines. The contract involves fieldwork such as plot establishment and data collection to support forest management activities. Pricing, terms, and conditions will be evaluated as detailed in exhibits 1 through 9.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

List of Exhibits

Exhibit 01 Site/Location List

Exhibit 02 Vicinity Map

Exhibit 03 Access Map

Exhibit 3A Project Maps

Exhibit 04 Sketch Map and Notes

Exhibit 05 Setting Form

Exhibit 06 Sample Design Form

Exhibit 07 Tree Data Form

Exhibit 08 Plot Data Form

Exhibit 09 CSE Inspection Form

Exhibit 01

Site List

Block Location Acres Number of Plots

1 005328 353 169

2 005327 1912 958

3 005326 813 406

Project Total 1533

Exhibit 02: Vicinity Map

Exhibit 03: Access Map

Exhibit 3A: Project Maps

Exhibit 04

Sketch Map and Traverse Notes Project Name:

Plot Spacing: (Chains / Feet) by (Chains / Feet)

From To AZ Dist. Corrections

RP

R.P. Species: DBH/DRC:

Other Information:

Travel Route to R.P.:

NORTH

Exhibit 05

Setting Form

Project Name: 2023 Clear Cr. Stocking Exam

Region

Proc.

Forest

District

Location

0053__________

Stand #

0______

Owner

USFS

State

ID

County

Admin.

Forest

Date

Photo ID

XXXXXXXXXXXXX

Exam Level

Exam Purpose

RE

Stratum

XXXXXX

Existing Vegetation

XXXXXXXX

Potential Veg.

Ref

XXX

Potential Vegetation

XXXXXXXX

Structure

XX

Capable Growing

Fuel Model

Elevation

Aspect

Slope

Slope Position

Acres

Radial Growth Interval

XX

Radial Growth Interval 2

XX

Height Growth Interval

Fuel Photo Reference

Precision Protocol

CSE_E

Examiner

Remarks (242 characters)________________________________________________________________

Damage Category

Damage Agent

XXX

Damage Severity

XXX

Species of Management Interest

Exhibit 06

Sample Design Form

REGION: _04__ PROCLAIMED FOREST: _02 ___ DISTRICT: 05 ___ LOCATION: 0053_ STAND NO._0______________

Form Type

XXXXXX

Sample Selection Method

XXX

Sample Expansion

Factor

XXXXX.X

Starting Azimuth

Condition

XXXX

Subpop.

Filter

Selection Criteria Number

XX

Variable

Minimum

Value

XXXX.X

Subpop.

Maximum

Value

XXXX.X

TREE FRQ 50 _________ LIVE 1 DBH 5.0 999.9

TREE FRQ 50 LIVE 2 DBH 0.1 4.99

OR LIVE 3 HGT 0.30 4.49

Sample Design Remarks: (242 characters)

Criteria Number 4, DOM4

Exhibit 07

Tree Data Form

REGION: _04__ PROC. FOREST: _02 ___ DISTRICT: 05 ___ LOCATION: 0053_ STAND NO.___________ Fixed Plot Size: _1/50th Ac__

Plot # Tag # Tree Status

Species Tree Count

DBH Height HGT Grow

Crown Ratio

Crown Class

Damage Category

Damage Agent

Damage Severity

Tree Remarks

XXX XXX X XXXXXXXX XXX XXX.X XXX XX.X XXX XX XX XXX XXX 30 characters

Exhibit 08

Plot Data Form

Region: 04 Proc. Forest: 02 District: 05 Location: 0053_______ Stand No.___________

Plot # Latitide Longitude Cap Grow

Area Aspect Slope Elevation Plot Remarks

XXX XXX XX' XX.XX" XXX XX' XX.XX" XXX XXX XXX XXXX

Exhibit 09 Common Stand Exam Inspection Form with Accuracy Standards

COMMON STAND EXAM INSPECTION FORM

side 1

BLOCK

FOREST / UNIT

DATE BLOCK RECEIVED

DATE BLOCK INSPECTED INSPECTORS

NUMBER OF STANDS: NUMBER OF STANDS INSPECTED: L.S. TREE RECORDS INSPECTED:

NUMBER OF PLOTS: NUMBER OF PLOTS INSPECTED: S.S. TREE RECORDS INSPECTED:

OFFICE INSPECTION

ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE N/A

⚫ ALL REQUIRED MATERIALS RETURNED IN GOOD CONDITION

⚫ CORRECT NUMBER OF PLOTS COMPLETED IN EACH STAND

⚫ ALL REQUIRED FORMS AND FIELDS COMPLETED AND LEGIBLE

⚫ MINIMUM NUMBER OF SITE/GROWTH TREES COLLECTED FOR EACH SITE

⚫ ALL STANDS MEET MINIMUM TREE PER PLOT AVERAGES

⚫ ELECTRONIC DATA COMPLETE AND ACCEPTABLE

FIELD INSPECTION

ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE N/A

⚫ ALL REFERENCE POINTS AND PLOT CENTERS RELOCATABLE

⚫ ALL PLOT LOCATIONS CORRECT AND UNBIASED

⚫ ALL STANDS HAVE A PLOT DISTRIBUTION THAT

EQUALLY SAMPLES ALL PORTIONS OF THE ENTIRE STAND

⚫ SUFFICIENT ERRORS ACCUMULATE TO INDICATE A DISCREPANCY TREND

⚫ ALL INFORMATION ON SAMPLE DESIGN FORMS COMPLETE AND CORRECT

⚫ ALL STANDS AND PLOTS HAVE CORRECT STAND ID (LOCATION, STAND)

TOTAL FORM SCORE CALCULATION

Setting Form Score

Sample Design Form Score

Plot Form Score

Total Tree Form Score

Ground Surface Cover Form Score

Vegetation Composition Form Score

Downed Woody Form Score

TOTAL SCORE (sum of all scores)

OFFICE AND FIELD INSPECTION

-- ANY UNACCEPTABLE ITEM FAILS INSPECTION BLOCK

INSPECTION BLOCK

TOTAL FORM SCORE CALCULATION

All form scores < 5.0 and Total Score < 10.0 = pass (full payment) PASS

Any Form >= 5.0 = rework forms that fail for entire inspection unit

Total Score >= 10.0 = rework entire inspection unit FAIL

Errors in any field that has a Point Value of "unacceptable" will fail the block

INSPECTION CREW SIGNATURES:

DATE

DATE

COMMENTS AND FOLLOW-UP ACTION on side 2

Side 2

LOCATION STAND PLOT NUMBERS

COMMENTS:

FOLLOW-UP ACTION:

SETTING FORM

A B C

FIELD NAME ACCURACY STANDARD POINT VALUE

# OF

ERRORS

DEDUCTION (A

X B)

2 Region no errors unacceptable

3 Proclaimed Forest no errors unacceptable

4 District no errors unacceptable

5 Location no errors unacceptable

6 Stand Number no errors unacceptable

7 Ownership no errors unacceptable

8 State no errors unacceptable

9 County no errors unacceptable

10 Administrative Forest no errors unacceptable

11 Date no errors 2

12 Photo ID no errors 1 x

13 Exam Level no errors unacceptable

14 Exam Purpose no errors unacceptable

15 Stratum no errors 2 x

16 Existing Veg no errors 5 x

17 Potential Veg Reference no errors unacceptable x

18 Potential Veg + phase 20 x

19 Structure no errors 2 x

20 Cap. Growing Area % + 10 units 1

21 Fuel Model no errors 2 x

22 Elevation + 2 contour intervals 3

23 Aspect + 45 degrees 3

24 Slope + 10 units 2

25 Slope Position + 1 class 2 x

26 Acres no errors unacceptable

27 Radial Growth Interval no errors unacceptable x

28 Radial Growth Interval #2 no errors unacceptable x

29 Height Growth Interval no errors unacceptable

30 Fuel Photo Reference no errors unacceptable x

31 Precision Protocol no errors unacceptable

32 Examiner no errors 1

33 Setting Remarks complete and accurate 5

34 Damage Category no errors 2 x

35 Damage Agent no errors 1 x

36 Damage Severity no errors 1 x

37 Species of Mgt. Interest no errors 1 x

38 Sketch Map & Traverse Notes complete and accurate 10

Total Deductions (sum of column 'C') D

Number of Stands Inspected E

Setting Form Score (D C E) F

SAMPLE DESIGN FORM

A B C

FIELD NAME

ACCURACY

STANDARD

POINT

VALUE

# OF

ERRORS

DEDUCTION

(A X B)

1 Form Type no errors unacceptable

2 Selection Method Type no errors unacceptable

3 Sample Expansion Factor no errors unacceptable

4 Starting Azimuth no errors 7 x

5 Points Installed no errors unacceptable

6 Subpop Filter no errors unacceptable

7 Sample/Select Remarks complete and accurate 5 x

8 Selection Criteria no errors unacceptable

9 Subpop Variable no errors unacceptable

10 Subpop Min Value no errors unacceptable

11 Subpop Max Value no errors unacceptable

Number of Stands Inspected E

Sample Design Form Score (D C E) F

PLOT FORM

A B C

FIELD NAME

ACCURACY

STANDARD

POINT

VALUE

# OF

ERRORS

DEDUCTION

(A X B)

1 Plot Number no errors 10

2 Plot Latitude no errors 6

3 Plot Longitude no errors 6

4 Cap. Growing Area % + 10 % 2

5 Plot Aspect + 45 degrees 6

6 Plot Slope % + 10 units 6

7 Slope Position + 1 class 6 x

8 Slope Horizontal Shape + 1 class 2 x

9 Slope Vertical Shape + 1 class 2 x

10 Elevation + 2 contour intervals 6

11 Existing Veg no errors 10 x

12 Potential Veg no errors 10 x

13 Plot History no errors 6 x

14 Plot History Date 1) 2 x

15 Fuel Model no errors 2 x

16 Residue Descriptive Code no errors 2 x

17 Distance to Seed Wall no errors 2 x

18 Remarks complete and accurate 10

Number of Plots Inspected E

Plot Form Score (D C E) F

1)Year Required if field #13 is other than code 10 or blank

TREE FORM

Fixed PLOT -- Fixed Area Plot

A B C

FIELD NAME

ACCURACY

STANDARD POINT VALUE # OF ERRORS

DEDUCTION (A X

B)

1 Plot Number no errors 2

2 Tag ID Number no errors 2

3 Tree Status no errors 5

4 Site Tree/GST - field correct no errors 5 x

5 Tree Species no errors 5

6 Tree Count 5) 10

7 Number of Stems no errors for DRC species 2 x

8 DBH/DRC 6) 10

9 Tree Height + 10 % 10

10 Height to Crown + 10 % 2 x

11 Radial Growth + 2/20 inch 5 x

12 Radial Growth #2 + 2/20 inch 5 x

13 Height Growth

Height > 6 ft. + 1.0 foot 5

Height <= 6 ft. + 0.1 foot

14 Tree Age + 10 % 5 x

15 Crown Ratio + 10 units 5

16 Crown Class no errors 5

17 Crown Width + 20% 5 x

18 Wildlife Use no errors 2 x

19 Log/Snag Decay no errors 5 x

20 Cone Serotiny no errors for PICO, PIBA 5 x

21 Damage Category no errors 5

22 Damage Agent no errors 2

23 Damage Part no errors 2

24 Damage Severity no errors 5

25 Tree Remarks complete and accurate 10

S.S. Deductions (sum of column 'C') D

S.S. Tree Records Inspected E

S.S. Sample Score (D C E) F

Total Tree Form Score

5) Tree Count (small sample plot) Accuracy Stds: 6) DBH/DRC Accuracy Standards:

Height Diameter Actual Trees Accuracy a. < 5.0 inch correct dia. Class

Range Range On Plot Standard b. 5.0+ inches + 1 %

-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- c. Estimated DRC + 1.0 inch

*All All 0 0 trees

< 0.3 feet < brkpt dbh 1 - 5 correct < 0.3 feet < brkpt dbh 6 - 10 + 2 trees < 0.3 feet < brkpt dbh >= 11 + 4 trees

All >= brkpt dbh >= 1 0 trees

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .