Attachment 2 - Appendix B Technology Readiness Levels.pdf

PDF 504 KB Posted

Attached to
Technology Operational Experimentation Events (TOEE) 26 Experimentation Campaign focused on Emerging Technologies
Solicitation number
N61331-26-SN-Q05
Issued by

About this file

This document is an Appendix B detailing Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs), which provide a systematic method for assessing the maturity of technological developments across nine distinct levels. The levels range from Level 1 (basic principles observed and reported) to Level 9 (mission-proven integration through successful operations), with each level describing increasingly sophisticated stages of technology integration and system development. The chart includes two parallel columns - one for Integration Readiness Levels (IRL) and another for Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) - that progressively outline the technological advancement from initial concept formulation through final operational deployment and sustained support.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
SAM.GOV Questions-Response_V2.0_11 Dec.docx DOCX document
SAM.GOV Questions-Response_9 Dec.docx DOCX document
N61331-26-SN-Q05 RFI Document.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Appendix A Quad Chart (PowerPoint).pptx PPTX presentation
Attachment 3 - Key Dates.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Appendix B: Technology Readiness Levels

Level IRL TRL

Execute a support program that meets operational support performance requirements and sustains the system in the most cost-effective manner over its total life cycle.

Integration is mission-proven through successful mission operations.

Actual integration completed and mission-qualified through test and demonstration in the system Environment.

Actual system completed and qualified through test and demonstration.

The integration of technologies has been verified and validated with sufficient detail to be actionable.

System prototype demonstration in relevant environment.

The integrating technologies can accept, translate, and structure information for its intended Application.

System/subsystem model demonstration in relevant environment.

There is sufficient control between technologies necessary to establish, manage, and terminate the Integration.

Component and/or breadboard validation in relevant environment.

There is sufficient detail in the quality and assurance of the integration between technologies.

Component and/or breadboard validation in laboratory environment.

There is compatibility between technologies to orderly and efficiently integrate and interact.

Analytical and experimental critical function and/or characteristic proof of Concept.

There is some level of specificity to characterize the interaction between technologies through their interface.

Technology concept and/or application formulated.

An interface between technologies has been identified with sufficient detail to allow characterization of the relationship.

Basic principles observed and reported.

Integration not observed; required interfaces lacking.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .