Attachment 11 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

(WHEN COMPLETED) SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

RFP: FA8575-21-R-0001

ATTACHMENT 11

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

RSAF F-15 Classified Repair and Return Support Services

(15 July 2021) *Sections 1 and 2 to be filled out by Offeror

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:________________________________________________________________________

B. Contractor Cage Code:_________________________________

C. Contract number: ______________________________________

D. Contract type: ______________________________

E. Role in the Program/Work Performed As:

_____ Prime _____ Subcontractor _____ Vendor/Supplier

F. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

G. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

H. Period of Performance:

1. Original MAX Contract $ Value (assuming all options exercised): ___________________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised): ____________________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable): ___________________

I. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

J. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

K. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

L. Description of service provided:

M. Rationale for relevancy assertion:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or Agency name:__________________________________________________________

B. Address: _________________________________________________________________________

C. Customer or Agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________

D. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

* Sections 3,4, and 5 to be filled by Government/Customer evaluator

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Name/Role of Evaluator Relative to Contract (e.g. Buyer, Program Manager, etc.)

B. Evaluator's title:_____________________________________________________

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number/email:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

Adjectival Rating Definition

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

NOTE: In Section 4, should your response be other than “satisfactory (S),” please provide supporting documentation in “Additional Remarks” in Section 5 or on an additional sheet to this document (which is in word format). If supporting documentation is not provided for ratings that are other than “satisfactory,” the ratings will be considered to be unsubstantiated and will be interpreted as satisfactory.

NOTE to Past Performance Evaluation Team: The following are SAMPLE questions. Past Performance evaluation teams MUST construct a simple and concise PPQ, tailored to seek out key information tied to the significant aspects of the planned acquisition. Teams should develop as few questions as possible.

Avoid questions that can be answered with a “yes” or “no” but instead, include probing and direct questions to draw out only the required information desired.

Technical Performance SubC SatC NeutC LimC NoC N/A

1. How was the quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts?

2. How adequate/effective was the System Engineering Process?

3. How well did the contractor develop, and execute test and evaluation efforts

4. How well did the contractor understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements?

5. Extent to which Company’s products and/or services met the technical/performance requirements of the specification

Program Management SubC SatC NeutC LimC NoC N/A

1. Quality of Completed Product (less than 1% defect-free repairs turned in to customer)

2. How did the contractor manage quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts?

3. How effective was the contractor’s material management (including Government Furnished Property and/or Contract Acquired Property)?

4. How well did the contractor perform to meet contract identified average Turnaround Time (TAT) for completed assets per option and overall contract? In the remarks, specify if the contractor met, exceeded, or failed to meet contractual average contract TAT.

5. How well did contractor develop, maintain, and update a Management Information System (MIS) to track, process, modify, and archive historical repair data for all items repaired?

1. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes_____ Default_____ Convenience_____ Pending Terminations_____ No_____

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules)

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

2. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? If yes, explain.

3. Describe the contractor’s or company’s strong and/or weak points identified as a result of technical performance and any technical performance risk identified during the life of the contract.

4. If given a choice, would you award to this contractor again? If not, please explain.

5. Describe contractor’s ability to establish and maintain certified sources of repair.

Additional Remarks.

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION