Attachment 11 - Past Performance Questionaire W81XWH22R0011.pdf

PDF 326 KB Posted

Attached to
Research and Laboratory Services Support to the Lugar Center, Georgia and the US European Command (USEUCOM) Area of Responsibility (AOR)
Solicitation number
W81XWH22R0011
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment 1-Performance Work Statement (Amendment 1).pdf PDF
W81XWH22R0011 Amendment 1.pdf PDF
Attachment 6- Labor Category Rate Pricing (Amendment 1).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 5- Labor Category Descriptions (Amendment 1).pdf PDF
Attachment 12 - Task Order 1 PerformanceWorkStatement (PWS) - Science Research Support Services (SRRS) Amendment 1.pdf PDF
Attachment 5- Labor Category Descriptions.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Common European Framework - Reference for Language.pdf PDF
Attachment 10 - Historical Level of Effort.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 1-Performance Work Statement.pdf PDF
Attachment 14 -Task Order 2 Performance Work Statement (PWS) Program Management.pdf PDF
Attachment 12 - Task Order 1 PerformanceWorkStatement (PWS) - Science Research Support Services (SRRS).pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Holidays Observed.pdf PDF
Attachment 4- Organizational Conflict of Interest Certification.pdf PDF
Attachment 8- WRAIR Participation Agreement A.pdf PDF
Attachment 7- Task Order 1 and 2 Pricing Table.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W81XWH22R0011.pdf PDF
Attachment 9- WRAIR Participation Agreement B.pdf PDF
Attachment 15- Task Order 2 QASP PM Support.pdf PDF
Attachment 13 - Task Order 1 QASP- Science Research Support Services (SRRS).pdf PDF
Attachment 6- Labor Category Rate Pricing.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 17 - Government Furnished Property - Task Order 2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 16 - Government Furnished Property -Task Order 1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

US ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH ACQUISITION ACTIVITY 820

CHANDLER STREET

FORT DETRICK MD 21702-5014

FCMR-ACO-SA 23 November 2021

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) -W81XWH22R0002.

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity (USAMRAA) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP.

As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 541715. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.

Please complete the enclosure and return to the Contracting Office, no later than 15 days after receipt. Submit your completed questionnaire to Sharew Hailu at sharew.hailu.civ@mail.mil.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at 301-319-2051 or email: laura.a.tomitz.civ@mail.mil

Sincerely, Laura Tomitz

Contracting Officer mailto:sharew.hailu.civ@mail.mil.

mailto:laura.a.tomitz.civ@mail.mil

Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does (and/or) notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence

Rationale:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

Comments:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name):

Telephone Number:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

2021-12-09T12:34:53-0500
TOMITZ.LAURA.A.1016349271

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .