Attachment 1 - Revised Eval Factors.docx

DOCX document 25 KB Posted

Attached to
Y1DZ--FY23 - Tier 2: B/B Renovate Spinal Cord (546-23-115)
Solicitation number
36C24823R0107_A01
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation requests proposals for a renovation project at a Spinal Cord Clinic within the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 8. Offerors must submit examples of relevant experience completing similar healthcare renovation projects within the last five years, demonstrating specialized experience and technical competence in trade coordination. Proposals will be evaluated based on the offeror's overall construction capability and ability to provide all necessary labor, materials, tools and equipment to complete the project tasks as defined in the Statement of Work. The evaluation will also assess the level of detail in the offered progress schedule, including start and end dates for milestones, material submissions, inspections, and the critical path. The schedule must specify the days and hours of construction operations and the expected monthly completion percentages.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

3. FACTOR II - TECHNICAL QUALIFICATION

Subfactor 1: Specialized Experience and Technical Competence.

The offeror is required to submit at least one (1) example project demonstrating your firms experience and capability similar to this requirement. These demonstrations in similar experience and capability shall be in a healthcare environment with trade coordination work as critical activities for each of the two (2) below capability areas that demonstrate the prime’s and/or key subcontractor’s experience and capability to successfully complete the example project. A total of up to four (4) example projects shall be provided.

Example projects submitted are to demonstrate a firm’s experience and capability and must be relevant to the work that the firm will be performing under the prospective contract. The offeror shall explain how the work performed by the proposed firm in the example project is relevant to the proposed acquisition.

“Relevant” is defined as work constructing/renovation, expansions, in a health care facility. “Recent” is defined as a contract completed within the last five years.

Subfactor 2: Overall Capability.

How the contractor intends to provide all construction services including labor, materials, tools, and equipment as necessary to construct the project described below and other specific tasks as further defined in the Statement of Work.

4. FACTOR III. – SCHEDULE

The Government will evaluate the proposed progress schedule and the extent it shows the milestones and major portions of the contract work, including, material submissions, submittal acceptance, partial and final inspections, punch list completion, testing, etc. with start dates and completion dates for each, and the critical path being clearly identifiable.

The Government will evaluate the level of detail for specific tasks with dates for each step of the process including Mobilization; Demolition; Phasing; Provisions for overtime or shiftwork; Timing of relocation of existing utilities; Commissioning; Tests and final inspection, and whether task durations are expressed in calendar days.

The Government will evaluate how well the Offeror specified the days of the week and the hours of construction operations, and the percentage of contract completion that will be achieved at the end of each month of the contract.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .