Attachment 1 QASP.pdf

NAVAL NETWORK WARFARE COMMAND (NETWARCOM)

Operation Flank Speed

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)

1.0 PURPOSE

This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is a Government developed and applied document used to make sure that systematic quality assurance methods are used in the administration of the

Performance Based Service Contract (PBSC) standards included in this contract. The intent is to ensure that the Contractor performs in accordance with performance metrics set forth in the contract documents, that the Government receives the quality of services called for in the contract and that the Government only pays for the acceptable level of services received.

2.0 AUTHORITY

Authority for issuance of this QASP is provided under FAR 52-212-4(a), Inspection/Acceptance, which provides for inspections and acceptance of the articles, services, and documentation called for in the contract to be accomplished by the Contracting Officer or their duly authorized representative.

3.0 SCOPE

The Contractor, and not the Government, is responsible for management and quality control actions necessary to meet quality standards set forth by the contract. The QASP is put in place to provide

Government surveillance oversight of the Contractor’s quality control efforts to assure that they are timely, effective and are delivering the results specified in the contract. The QASP is not a part of the contract nor is it intended to duplicate the Contractor’s Management Plan. The Government may provide the Contractor an information copy of the QASP as an Attachment to the solicitation to support the

Contractor’s efforts in developing its plan for maintaining the levels of quality anticipated to be delivered under the terms of the contract.

4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

The Government resources shall have responsibilities for the implementation of this QASP as follows:

Contracting Officer – The Contracting Officer ensures performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensures compliance with the terms of the contract and safeguards the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. It is the Contracting Officer that assures the Contractor receives impartial, fair and equitable treatment under the contract. The

Contracting Officer is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the

Contractor’s performance.

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) – An individual designated in writing by the

Contracting Officer to act as his authorized representative to assist in administering a contract.

The source and authority for the COR is the Contracting Officer. COR limitations are contained in the written letter of appointment.

5.0 METHODS OF QA SURVEILLANCE

The below listed methods of surveillance shall be used in the administration of this QASP. The QASP

Matrix (Attachment 1) describes the methods of surveillance that shall be used to monitor the services and deliverables to be provided under the contract.

Random Checks/Inspections – Random checks will be conducted to ensure compliance with the

Standard Operating Procedures (SOP). The COR or Technical Point of Contact (TPOC) will conduct the random monitoring.

6.0 DOCUMENTATION

The COR will maintain a complete Quality Assurance Surveillance file. The file shall contain such documents as copies of all receiving reports, evaluations, recommendations, and any other actions related to the Government’s performance of the quality assurance function. All such records will be retained for the life of this contract. At a minimum, the Quality Assurance Surveillance file shall contain:

Copies of letters of appointment for the COR

A copy of the contract and all modifications

A copy of the QASP and all subsequent revisions

The names and titles of individuals on the contract administration team

A record of all accepted receiving reports, required documentation with the submission of each receiving report and reviews.

Memoranda for the record or minutes of any pre-performance meetings or conferences.

Memoranda for the record or minutes of any meetings or discussions with the contractor, or others, pertaining to the contract or contract performance or changes to the PWS.

7.0 ANALYSIS OF CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE

The analysis of contractor performance shall be conducted at the end of each month and serves to provide a summary of the Contractor’s performance to the Contracting Officer and the Contractor. Overall performance is important in determining whether to increase, decrease or maintain the current level of surveillance and/or whether to initiate corrective action to bring the Contractor’s work up to the standards of the specification.

QASP MATRIX

Performance

Element Performance Requirement

Surveillance

Method Frequency

Acceptable

Quality Level

(AQL)

Procedures to be taken when performance standards are not met

Progress Review

Reports must include status of support provided to NNWC in completion of assigned missions (deployments and sustainment) in support of NNWC operations and associated tasks specific to PWS.

Review by

Technical Lead and/or COR.

Monthly

95% of reports submitted on time and without rework due to errors.

FAR Clause 52.212-4(a)

Inspection/Acceptance

Contractor Quality

Assurance Plan

Contractor Quality Assurance Plan are submitted as prescribed in the PWS.

Overall contract performance of sufficient quality to earn a satisfactory or higher rating.

Assessment by

Technical Lead provided to, and reviewed by the

COR

Due within 30 days of POP start and updated annually

98% of reports submitted on time and without rework due to errors.

FAR Clause 52.212-4(a)

Inspection/Acceptance

Monthly Status

Reports

Monthly Activity reports are submitted as prescribed in the PWS. Reports provide any issues and concerns that need to be resolved by the COR as contained in the PWS.

Inspection by the

COR/TPOC

By the 10th of each Month

95% of reports submitted on time and without rework due to errors. FAR Clause 52.212-4(a)

Inspection/Acceptance

Invoicing Monthly invoices per contract procedures are timely and accurate.

Review and acceptance of invoice by designated representative of

COR.

Monthly

99% of reports submitted on time and without rework due to errors. FAR Clause 52.212-4(a)

Inspection/Acceptance

Overall Contract

Performance

Overall contract performance of sufficient quality to earn a satisfactory or higher rating

Assessment by

Technical Lead provided to, and reviewed by the

COR

Annual or within one month of end of performance as directed by the

COR.

All performance elements and overall performance rated as satisfactory.

FAR Clause 52.212-4(a)

Inspection/Acceptance

Combatting

Trafficking in

Persons

Contractor shall ensure compliance with FAR 52.222-50 – Combatting

Trafficking in Persons

The Contracting

Officer will review as needed.

As needed

100% Remedies as available to the government, to include those in FAR

52.222-50

Mandatory Annual

Training

Completion of annual training as directed by Department of Defense.

The Contracting

Officer will review as needed.

As needed

100% FAR Clause 52.212-4(a)

Inspection/Acceptance

If performance is within acceptable levels, it will be considered to be satisfactory. If not, overall performance may be considered unsatisfactory.

INCENTIVES/DISINCENTIVES:

The COR makes an annual report on Contractor Performance (CPARS or other annual report). The Contractor’s failure to achieve satisfactory performance under the contract, reflected in the COR’s annual report, may result in termination of the contract and may also result in the loss of future Government contracts. Additionally, the

Contractor’s failure to achieve satisfactory performance under the contract may also result in the non-exercise of available options.

For each item that does not meet acceptable levels, the Government may issue a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR).

CDRs will be forwarded to the Contracting Officer with a copy sent to the Contractor. The Contractor must reply in writing within 5 days of receipt identifying how future occurrences of the problem will be prevented. Based upon the

Contractor’s past performance and plan to solve the problem, the Contracting Officer will determine if any further action will be taken.