Attachment 1_Past Performance Questionnaire Template.pdf

POC

Email

POC

Phone

Start Date: End Date:

SECTION A

(TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR REQUESTING REFERENCE)

PART I: OFFEROR INFORMATION

Offeror Name:

Total Project/Engagment or Contract Value (all years)

Offeror Address Offeror DUNS

Title of Project/ Engagement or Contract Number:

Period of Performance

Project/ Engagement or Contract Role (Prime or Subcontract)

Offeror POC Name

SECTION B

(TO BE COMPLETED BY INDIVIDUAL PROVIDING REFERENCE)

PART I: REFERENCE INFORMATION

Name and Title

Project/ Engagement or Contract Role (Lead Attorney, Project Organization

General Description of the Services and Complexity of the Work Performed

Phone Number Email

E VG S M U

Comments:

Performance Element

1. Quality of Product or Service: Assess the Offeror’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship/performance (e.g.

commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards).

Comments:

2. Schedule: Assess the timeliness of the Offeror against the completion schedules and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule).

Please assess the requesting firm in each performance element below by assigning an “X” to the most appropriate rating:

• Exceptional (E): Performance met contractual/engagement requirements and exceeded many to the reference's benefit. The performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken were highly effective.

• Very Good (VG): Performance met contractual/engagement and exceeded some to the reference's benefit. The performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken were effective.

• Satisfactory (S): Performance met requirements. The performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken were satisfactory.

• Marginal (M): Performance did not meet some requirements. The performance being evaluated had a serious problem for which a corective action has not been identified or the proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

• Unsatisfactory (U): Performance did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The performance contained serious problem(s) for which corrective actions were ineffective.

Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again? Why?

3. Business Relations: Assess the contractor’s coordination of all the activities needed to perform services; specifically the timeliness, completeness, and quality of the offeror’s problem identification procedures and corrective actions. Asses the Offeror’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, customer satisfaction, and management of subcontractors if applicable.

Comments:

4. Management of Key Personnel: Assess the contractor’s performance in providing qualfied personnel to perform services.

Comments:

Based on the above, what is your overall rating of this contractor’s performance?

Sheet1