The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
Past Performance Questionnaire
Section I: Contract Identification This section identifies the specific effort being evaluated.
| Contractor Name |
| [Insert Offeror Name] |
| Contract Number |
| [Insert Number, e.g., W9124J-26-C-XXXX] |
| Contract Type |
| [e.g., FFP, CPFF, T&M] |
| Total Contract Value |
| [Include base and all options] |
| Period of Performance |
| [Start Date to End Date] |
| Project Title/Description |
| [Brief summary of the scope of work] |
Section II: Evaluator Information This identifies the individual providing the rating (e.g., COR, Program Manager, or Contracting Officer).
| Evaluator Name |
| [Insert Name] |
| Title/Role |
| [e.g., Contracting Officer's Representative (COR)] |
| Agency/Organization |
| [e.g., Department of the Army, ARL] |
| Phone Number |
| [Insert Number] |
| Email Address |
| [Insert .mil or .gov Email] |
Section III: Adjectival Rating Scale The following ratings should be used to evaluate the contractor's performance in Section IV. These definitions are consistent with CPARS standards.
| Exceptional (E) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. |
| Very Good (VG) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. |
| Satisfactory (S) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. |
| Marginal (M) |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. |
| Unsatisfactory (U) |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. |
| N/A |
| Performance was not required in this area or the evaluator has no knowledge of it. |
Section IV: Performance Evaluation Please rate the contractor in the following areas based on the scale provided in Section III.
| Performance Area |
| Rating (E, VG, S, M, U, N/A) |
| Quality of Product/Service |
| [Rating] |
| Schedule/Timeliness |
| [Rating] |
| Management Effectiveness |
| [Rating] |
| Small Business Subcontracting |
| [Rating] |
| Regulatory Compliance |
| [Rating] |
Section V: Narrative Comments Please provide specific examples to justify ratings of "Exceptional," "Marginal," or "Unsatisfactory."
| Question |
| Evaluator Response |
| What were the contractor’s greatest strengths? |
| [Insert Text] |
| What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses? |
| [Insert Text] |
| Were there any Cure Notices or Show Cause letters? |
| [Yes/No - Explain if Yes] |
| Would you recommend them for future awards? |
| [Yes/No - Explain] |
Section VI: Signature I certify that the information provided is accurate and based on my professional observation of the contractor's performance.
| __________________________________________ |
| April 17, 2026 |
