Attachment-1___Market_Survey v3.docx

DOCX document 17 KB Posted

Attached to
Request for Information (March ARB BOS)
Solicitation number
FA4664-22-SS-MARB-3
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment-2___March_ARB_Draft_PWS__14 Mar 2022.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Market Research Survey #3 March Air Reserve Base, CA

Part I - Company I.D. Information

Name of Company ______________________________________________________ Address _______________________________________________________________ Point of Contact ________________________________________________________ Phone ________________________________________________________________ Email _________________________________________________________________ Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code __________________________

To further assist in the planning of the Government’s acquisition strategy for the performance of Base Operations & Support (BOS) services at March Air Reserve Base, CA, we request that you take the time to complete this secondary market survey. We request that you email your response to jon.aaron@us.af.mil so as to arrive no later than 5 August 2022. We have attached our latest draft Performance Work Statement to assist you with an understanding of the scope and complexity of the various operations and requirements taking place @ March Air Reserve Base. Thank you in advance for your time and effort.

1. Is your company considered a large or small business for the purposes of performing BOS services under NAICS code, 561210, Facilities Support Services (Small Business Size Standard - $41.5 Million)

[ ] Large [ ] Small

Part IV - Performance Requirements

2. Based on the draft requirement, would splitting/dissecting this comprehensive PWS into several logically focused and distinct contracts be more beneficial for your company?

[ ] Yes [ ] No

3. In regards to the prior question, which areas (if any) of this requirement would be better served as a separate contract for performance and pricing purposes? Please provide details.

4. Based on the draft PWS, do the requirements and workload data contained within each Tab adequately support the associated Service Summaries and performance-level thresholds?

[ ] Yes [ ] No

5. In regards to the prior question, does your company believe the Government’s performance standards are realistic or unrealistic for the various requirements? Please elaborate.

6. Based on the draft PWS, would your company describe this requirement as performance-based or compliance-based? Does the language and regulations referenced throughout allow your company the flexibility to provide superior and innovative services as you might provide to other customers? Please elaborate.

[ ] Yes [ ] No

7. Based on the draft PWS, should the Government reduce or eliminate the various AFIs, AFMANs, AFTOs, and Common Output Level Standards (COLS) employed throughout this requirement? What would you recommend the Government replace these instructions and standards with? Please elaborate.

[ ] Yes [ ] No

8. Based on the draft PWS, does the information and workload data described within provide enough information for your company to provide a realistic and thorough technical and cost proposal?

[ ] Yes [ ] No

9. In regards to the prior question, what additional information would the Government need to appropriately and openly disclose to industry in order for your company to provide a more realistic, competitive, and thorough technical and cost proposal?

10. Based on the draft requirement, is the Government:

· clearly articulating standards of performance?[ ] Yes [ ] No
· clearly articulating what needs to be measured?[ ] Yes [ ] No
· clearly articulating responsibilities and accountability?[ ] Yes [ ] No
· providing explicit direction and clear-cut instruction?[ ] Yes [ ] No
· eliminating conflicts of interest between the parties?[ ] Yes [ ] No
· maximizing commercial practices for efficiencies?[ ] Yes [ ] No
· maximizing opportunities for innovative solutions?[ ] Yes [ ] No

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .