Attachment 1 Blank PPQ.docx
DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CERCLA REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION AND RESPONSE ACTIONS at FORMER EAKER AIR FORCE BASE, ARKANSAS
- Solicitation number
- FA890323R0072
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SF330 Architect-Engineer Qualifications.pdf | ||
| BRAC RI SYNOPSIS_Eaker_16 May 23.pdf | ||
| Draft_23-C-XXXX_PFAS-RI_Eaker_SOW_Rev 04142023.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
16 May 2023
FA8903-23-R-0072
SYNOPSIS INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS OR RESPONDENTS
Attachment 1
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor:________________________________________________________________________
B. Contractor Cage Code: _________________________________
C. Contract number: ______________________________________
D. Contract type: ______________________________
E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________
G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________
H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________
I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
J. Description of service provided:
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or agency name: __________________________________________________________ B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________
C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator's name: __________________________________________________________________
B. Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________
C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ________________________________________________________
Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract: ____________________
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
| CODE | PERFORMANCE RATING | |
| B | BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded many of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at a superior level. Performance was accomplished with very few minor problems, and the contractor took immediate and effective corrective actions for those problems that did occur. |
| P | PURPLE/VERY GOOD - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded some of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed very well. Performance was accomplished with some minor problems, and the contractor took timely and effective corrective action for those problems that did occur. |
| G | GREEN/SATISFACTORY - During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level. Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur. |
| Y | YELLOW/MARGINAL – During the entire period, the contractor did not always meet some of the requirements of the contract and intervention was required to continue performance. There were instances where performance was at a less than acceptable level; performance was accomplished with some problems and some corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| R | RED/UNSATISFACTORY – During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. |
| N/A | NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know. |
| Performance Factors (PF) | |
| B | |
| P | |
| G | |
| Y | |
| R | |
| N/A |
PF1 Cost Control and Cost-Effective Performance
PF2 Quality Control with Contract Specifications and Schedules
PF3 Schedule Control
PF4 Compliance with Laws and Regulations
PF5 Technical Performance
2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), P/VG (Purple/Very Good), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
3. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
| Yes___ | Default___ | Convenience___ | Pending Terminations___ |
| No ___ |
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature Date Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire via E-Mail to: rita.leal@us.af.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .