Attachment 04 Technical Evaluation Rating.pdf
PDF 121 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Armed Guards for 3592-EM-CA Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 70FBR923Q00000013
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| WD 2015-5647 (Santa Barbara).pdf | ||
| Attachment 03 SOW - 3592-EM-CA.pdf | ||
| WD 2015-5617 (Merced).pdf | ||
| WD 2015-5603 (Kern).pdf | ||
| Attachment 01 - Provisions Clauses.pdf | ||
| WD 2015-5609 (Fresno).pdf | ||
| Attachment 05 Contractor Assurance Certification.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 02 Pricing Worksheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
The technical evaluation rating criteria are defined as follow:
Rating DESCRIPTION High Confidence The Government has high confidence that the Contractor understands the requirement, proposes a sound approach, and will be successful in performing the requirements with little or no Government intervention.
Demonstrates an excellent understanding of the requirements and an approach that significantly exceeds performance or capability standards.
Proposal has significant strengths that will significantly benefit the Government. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.
Some Confidence The Government has some confidence that the Contractor understands the requirement, proposes a sound approach, and will be successful in performing the requirements with some Government intervention.
Demonstrates an understanding of the requirement and an approach that meets performance or capability standards. Proposal presents an acceptable solution with few or no strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is moderate.
Low Confidence The Government has low confidence that the Contractor understands the requirement, proposes a sound approach, or will be successful in performing the requirements even with Government intervention.
Demonstrates a shallow understanding of the requirement and an approach that only marginally meets performance or capability standards necessary for minimal but acceptable contract performance. The risk of unsuccessful performance is high.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .