Attachment_01_PWS_2401821.pdf

Performance Work Statement

(PWS)

for

Multi-Platform Sustainment Engineering Services and Support Contract

For the Air Force Sustainment Center 848th SCMG

FD2030-24-01821

27 August 2025

Prepared by:

848 SCMG

Oklahoma City Air Logistics Complex (OC-ALC) Tinker Air Force Base (TAFB), Oklahoma73145

WARNING

This document contains technical data whose export is restricted by the Arms Export Control Act (Title 22, USC, Sec. 2751 et seq) or the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended, Title 50, USC, App. 2401, et seq.

Violations of these export laws are subject to severe criminal penalties. Disseminate in accordance with provision of DoD Directive 5230.25.

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT D

Distribution authorized to the Department of Defense and US DOD Contractors, Critical Technology. Other requests shall be referred to 424 SCMS/GUEA.

DESTRUCTION NOTICE FOR UNCLASSIFIED/LIMITED DOCUMENTS

Destroy by any method that will prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document

DRAFT

March 7, 2025 Page 2 of 27

Table of Contents

1.0 SECTION I – DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES

1.1 RECURRING ENGINEERING SERVICES

1.1.1 Weapons System Support

1.1.2 Program Management

1.1.3 Onsite Engineering Support

1.1.4 Principal Point of Contact

1.1.5 Government Property Management

1.1.6 Configuration Management

1.1.7 Data Management, Automation and Delivery

1.1.8 Engineering Data / Document Files

1.1.9 Quality Assurance Program

1.1.10 System Safety Program

1.1.11 Task Status Review and Meetings

1.1.12 Proposal Activity, EA Task Definition, Estimating and Revisions

1.1.13 EA Preparation, Submission, and Task Change Request (TCR)

1.1.14 Change Analysis and Coordination

1.1.15 Technical Inquires (TI)

1.1.16 B-1 Horizontal Stabilizer Technical Inquiries (HSTI)

1.1.17 Commodities Drawing Cleanup

1.2 ENGINEERING SERVICES

1.2.1 Data

1.2.2 Meetings

1.2.3 EA Revisions

1.2.4 Associate Contractors

1.2.5 Configuration Management

1.2.6 Quality Assurance

1.2.7 Safety

1.2.8 System Engineering

1.2.9 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS)

1.2.10 Contractor Manpower Reporting

2.0 SERVICE SUMMARY

3.0 RIGHTS

ATTACHMENT A Applicable Documents and Other Requirements

ATTACHMENT B Engineering Assignment Form

ATTACHMENT C Technical Acceptance Letter

March 7, 2025 Page 3 of 27

ATTACHMENT D – Data Item Description (DID) List

Table of Tables

Table 1 Table 2

March 7, 2025 Page 4 of 27

ACRONYM LIST

ABU Accounting Business Unit ACA Associate Contractor Agreements AFSC Air Force Sustainment Center ALCM Air Launch Cruise Missile A-TEAM All-purpose Tool for Engineering, Analytics, and Management AutoTAR Automated Technical Assistance Request CALCM Conventional Air Launch Cruise Missile CDRL Contract Data Requirements List CEDMS Commodities Engineering Data Management System CM Configuration Management CPFF Cost Plus Fixed Fee DAL Data Accession List DER Designated Engineering Representatives DM Data Management DMS Diminishing Manufacturing Sources EA Engineering Assignment ECO Engineering Change Order E-UM Engineering Unit Member FAA Federal Aviation Administration FER Funds Expenditure Report FFP Firm Fixed Price GFP/E Government Furnished Property/Equipment GMESPM Government Multi-platform Engineering Services Program Manager JPO Joint Program Office MISTR Management of Items Subject to Repair NWRM Nuclear Weapon Related Material OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer OSS&E Operational Safety, Suitability, and Effectiveness PCO Procuring Contracting Officer POC Point of Contact PWS Performance Work Statement SCMG Supply Chain Management Group TCR Task Change Request TI Technical Inquiry TIM Technical Interchange Meeting TSR Task Status Review

March 7, 2025 Page 5 of 27

1.0 SECTION I – DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES

1.0.1 This Performance Work Statement (PWS) describes and defines the types of engineering tasks that will be performed by the contractor to support Air Force Sustainment Center (AFSC) 848 Supply Chain Management Group (SCMG) engineering. 848 SCMG engineering is delegated certain Operational Safety, Suitability, and Effectiveness (OSS&E) authority.

1.0.2 This multi-platform contract provides the 848 SCMG engineering with a vehicle to receive engineering assistance and solutions from the OEM on issues affecting structures, avionics, accessories, ground support, and commodity items managed by the 848 SCMG for which the OEM holds the rights to the data required to produce said assistance or solutions. These commodity items are used on B-1, B- 2, B-52, C-17, E-3, F-15, KC-135, KC-46, AGM-86 and other weapon systems. The Contractor must have access or can obtain access, and the rights to access, B-1, B-2, B-52, C-17, E-3, F-15, KC-135, KC-46 and AGM-86 OEM internal data systems to retrieve weapon system design data.

1.0.3 B-2 support will be provided when authorized by Northrop Grumman. This authorization will typically take the form of email correspondence forwarded by Government personnel where Northrop Grumman has directed the Government to seek assistance from Boeing.

1.0.3 Contractor employees shall identify themselves as Contractor personnel by introducing themselves or being introduced as Contractor personnel and displaying distinguishing badges or other visible identification for meetings with Government personnel. In addition, Contractor personnel shall appropriately identify themselves as Contractor employees in telephone conversations and in formal and informal written correspondence.

1.0.4 Emergency Procedures: Contractor employees shall follow the direction of Government employees regarding emergency procedures, i.e. fire, tornado, active shooter, bomb threats. It is the responsibility of the Contractor to provide guidance and establish procedures for responding to an emergency for their employees. It is the Contractors' responsibility to account for their employees following an emergency evacuation. Contractor Personnel shall participate with Government personnel in all fire and tornado drills at no additional cost to the Government.

1.0.5 Mission Essential Services: This requirement has been determined not to be mission/to be essential and does/does not require continued support during a crisis as defined in DFARS 252.237-7023.

1.0.6 Privately Owned Motor Vehicles (POV): Contractor personnel shall comply with the directives pertaining to operation of POVs on Tinker AFB per AFMAN 31-116 and TAFB Supplement, in its entirety, “Motor Vehicle Traffic Supervision”. The Contractor shall comply with Tinker AFBI 24-302, in its entirety for the operation of POVs within Tinker AFB.

1.0.7 Safety Intent statement: “The safety of everyone on Tinker AFB is our top priority. All Individuals must accept personal responsibility for safety and seek opportunities for improving the safety of our work environment. Everyone working on Tinker AFB is challenged to find, fix (if able) and report all hazards and near misses. It is our shared duty to take every reasonable step and precaution to prevent accidents and preserve the health/safety of each contractor and government employee.”

March 7, 2025 Page 6 of 27

1.1 RECURRING ENGINEERING SERVICES

The Contractor shall provide engineering services as defined in the specific Technical Inquiry (TI), B-1 Horizontal Stabilizer Technical Inquiry (HSTI), Commodities Drawing Cleanup, and Engineering Assignment (EA). The Contractor shall supply the resources needed to effectively and efficiently manage the accomplishment of the task covered by the requirement. Resources shall include: Contractor design, modification, and production data, along with personnel with special skills such as aerodynamics, structural and electrical design, stress analysis, corrosion, maintenance planning, non-destructive inspection, technical writing, and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Designated Engineering Representatives (DER) or Engineering Unit Member(E-UM).

Note: The only persons who may request services within the scope of an authorized engineering assignment are the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) or their delegate as listed in the attachment.

Only the PCO may approve changes in any of the requirements under this contract. Any change made at the direction of any other person will be considered to have been made without direction.

1.1.1 Weapons System Support

The Contractor shall provide engineering services to maintain a continuous engineering program in support of the commodity type items used on, but not limited to, B-1, B-2, B-52, C-17, E-3, F-15, KC- 135, KC-46 and AGM-86 for which the original equipment design activity, or the original design specification activity retains the data rights, or the items exist under a Proprietary Limited Rights legend.

Any activity related to a FAA certificated part, specifically including KC-46 parts, shall appropriately utilize a DER or E-UM.

1.1.2 Program Management

1.1.2.1 The Contractor shall provide program management to ensure planning, scheduling, control, and performance of the recurring engineering services requirements. Program management may include conducting management reviews with the Government of the construction of schedules, Funds Expenditure Reports (FERs), spend plans, periodic Task Status Reviews (TSRs) to assure all products and services are accomplished and delivered per the specific requirements. Track and evaluate all recurring engineering services for compliance with cost, schedule, and performance requirements utilizing a data management system (henceforth referred to as the data system).

1.1.2.2 The Contractor shall provide for, via the data system, the integration, integrity and availability of data to facilitate information sharing between the Contractor and the Government. Make the information available for reviews to assist in managing schedule, cost and performance. This includes the tracking of EA submittals, revisions, letters, deliverables, closures, events, and other actions as specified in each recurring engineering service. Performance thresholds are listed in paragraph 1.2.

NOTE: The data system Commodities Engineering Data Management System (CEDMS) is an automated program management system hosted on a Contractor server that is available for sharing across processes and platforms under this contract. The Contractor shall use the data system to enter data into a relational database management system, review data that is in the database, download data from the database, and use data to control applicable contractual process flows. The automation may be a

March 7, 2025 Page 7 of 27 portion or all of a process including EA revision, contract letter development and submittal, and technical inquiry development and response.

1.1.2.3 The Contractor shall track and evaluate all EAs (in-work and authorized) for compliance with cost, schedule, and technical performance requirements. Evaluate problems, processes, procedures, and analyze data, records, technical orders, specifications, and drawings to develop recommendations for problem resolution. At the request of the Government MESPM or designee, provide short duration support by telephone, E-mail, VTCN, or other electronic means. In those instances where the support by electronic means is impractical, provide personnel at the specified location(s) as defined in each EA or TI and in accordance with the Joint Travel Regulation (JTR) and Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR).

1.1.2.4 The health of the spares supply chain is at risk resulting in significant delays in obtaining quality parts, increased cost, and increased contract terminations. Due to unique and highly specialized technical requirements, OEM expertise shall be provided to enhance Government engineering and logistics for items managed by the 424th SCMS.

1.1.2.4.1 The ability to repair and re-procure Government items is becoming increasingly complex due to the divergence commonality within the mission design series of parts. As a result, product definition has deteriorated to the point that engineering projects are often required before re-procurement or repair of spares can take place. This is due to many factors, including, but not limited to: configuration drift of parts and aircraft over time, the existence of two different drawing repositories (Government and OEM), obsolescence of original materials and manufacturing processes, tooling that is either lost, in poor condition, or inappropriate for 21st century use, and a diminished supplier base.

1.1.2.4.2 The Contractor may analyze all All-purpose Tool for Engineering, Analytics, and Management (A-TEAM) Engineering Change Orders (ECOs) applicable to future requirements and document the results.

1.1.2.4.3 Review and reconcile A-TEAM ECOs with the Boeing engineering data when necessary.

1.1.2.4.4 Review, assess applicability, and document all Time Compliance Technical Orders (TCTOs) and Technical Order (TO) changes that affect the as built configuration or ability to produce identified parts when necessary.

1.1.2.4.5 Review, evaluate, analyze, and document tooling requirements when necessary.

1.1.2.4.6 Resolve aircraft spare parts non-conformities as requested by the Government.

1.1.2.4.7 Support evaluating technical data packages and tooling requirements for single/sole source Boeing parts. Prepare Statements of Work (SOW) for required items. Consult with Government engineers to clarify item requirements and configuration.

1.1.2.4.8 The Contractor shall support the integration of Government and Contractor drawing repositories in order to obtain the correct configuration for the spares supply chain.

March 7, 2025 Page 8 of 27

Note: Configuration of the most appropriate item may belong to the Government, or a Contractor or possibly a combination of both.

1.1.2.4.9 Optimize the Government first article process to prevent multi-year delays in obtaining serviceable parts for the operational Air Force lines.

1.1.2.4.10 Identify and contact the relevant Government and Contractor subject matter experts to clarify design decisions and resolve critical configuration issues which prevent the re-procurement and repair of serviceable spares.

1.1.2.4.11 Obtain, review, and revise limited access engineering drawings, specifications, and design documents, when requested using: Work Stoppage (WST), AF Form 202, TO Validations, Verifications, Updates, and Corrections (TOS), Suggestion evaluations (SUG), Mishap Support, and ECO (AF Form 3925).

1.1.2.4.12 Use technical expertise to obtain and interpret Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) specifications, OEM proprietary stress analysis documentation, original design data, and engineering test data.

1.1.2.4.13 Identify fleet usage and mission requirements in the applicable Boeing proprietary data bases and analyze how a change in these requirements affects the spares supply chain.

1.1.2.4.14 Obtain, review, and change limited access engineering drawings, specifications, and design documents to Institute Item Unique Identification (IUID) requirements on commercial derivative platforms.

1.1.2.4.15 Survey tooling, storage costs and inventory records (Government and Contractor) to develop a comprehensive approach to manage tooling in the most effective manner possible.

1.1.2.4.16 Review and coordinate changes to Contractor limited access engineering drawings, specifications, and design documents to develop tooling (assembly/alignment jigs) for use in the Management of Items Subject to Repair (MISTR) repair shop.

1.1.2.4.17 Survey Government and Contractor composite repair technologies and processes for incorporation into the improvement of stock listed parts.

1.1.2.4.18 Prepare status reports. (DI-MGMT-80368A/T, CDRL: A00A)

1.1.2.4.19 Prepare an annual report summarizing the efforts of this contract. (DI-MISC-81384/T, CDRL: A00F)

1.1.2.4.20 Performance will be evaluated as follows. AutoTAR: Greater than 85% on time with technically acceptable answers is satisfactory; Greater than 92% on time with technically acceptable answers is very good; and 100% on time with technically acceptable answers is exceptional. AutoTAR on time is defined as 5 business days for work stoppage, and 15 business days for non-work stoppage.

March 7, 2025 Page 9 of 27

DLA form 339: Greater than 88% on time completion is satisfactory; Greater than 96% on time completion is very good; and 100% on time completion is exceptional.

1.1.3 Onsite Engineering Support

The Contractor shall provide onsite technical and engineering personnel at TAFB to provide direct support to the Air Force Sustainment Center (AFSC) 848 Supply Chain Management Group (SCMG) engineering. At a minimum, contractor support shall include 100% coverage of day-shift operations.

Personnel shall have detailed knowledge of the design and maintenance of B-1, B-52, C-17, E-3, F-15, KC-135, KC-46 or AGM-86 equipment, systems and technical data. Personnel will have ready access to in-plant engineering for detailed support, engineering data, process specifications and models or ability to reach out to appropriate design SMEs located at other Boeing locations as necessary. The contractor shall assist with resolving the government 202’s as they occur. These personnel will be specifically skilled in the following aircraft disciplines: Electrical Power Generation and Distribution, Environmental Control System, Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems, Propulsion Systems, Flight Controls, Fuel Systems, Structures, Offensive and Defensive Avionics Systems, Communication Systems, Navigation Systems and Support Equipment. Any activity related to a FAA certificated part, specifically including KC-46 parts, shall appropriately utilize a DER or E-UM. Six engineering contract manpower equivalents are required to support operations.

1.1.4 Principal Point of Contact

The Contractor shall designate the program manager as the principal Point of Contact (POC) for all matters relating to this requirement. The POC shall be responsible for integrating all activities, which may include engineering, configuration management, quality assurance, logistics, technical publications, material/sub-contracting, program management, finance, and material/travel requirements, to assure timely responses to Government requests.

1.1.5 Government Property Management

1.1.5.1 The Contractor shall administer a program to safeguard, secure and condition Government Furnished Property/Equipment (GFP/E). Identify GFP requirements on EA(s) when such items are needed. Maintain and report Government Property at the beginning of each option year exercised and at the end of the last option year exercised. (DI-MGMT-80269/T, CDRL: A00P)

1.1.5.2 The Contractor shall provide engineering support to items that have been identified by the Government as being Nuclear Weapon Related Material (NWRM) when required on an EA. Special accounting and reporting of these assets’ location and condition are required and will be specified on the EA. Performance threshold is 100% inspection of GFP annually.

1.1.6 Configuration Management

The Contractor shall maintain and ensure compliance with the Configuration Management/Data Management (CM/DM) program used under the applicable platform.

March 7, 2025 Page 10 of 27

1.1.7 Data Management, Automation and Delivery

The Contractor shall ensure compliance with the CDRL delivery quality, and data management procedures as specified in the weapon system’s respective CM/DM Plans. The Contractor shall track the delivery of all data items. Data generated as a result of this contract and not required to be submitted by CDRL shall be identified as is required by the Data Accession List (DAL) CDRL Data Item Description.

Classified Non-CDRL documents shall have unclassified titles and shall be listed on the DAL as required by the DAL CDRL Data Item Description. If the Government would like delivery of any of the items listed on the DAL, then per the DFARS, the Government can request delivery of those items via a priced contract change under the Deferred Ordering Clause. The Contractor shall deliver unclassified CDRL deliverables electronically in the Government specified CM/DM system. Classified documents shall be sent by normal procedures for classified data. The Contractor shall address exceptions to agreed-to data submittals with the Government, and such exceptions shall be documented on individual CDRLs. The Contractor may revise the CDRL address/office symbol locations for those Government agencies requiring CDRL submittals when formal notification of address/office change is received from the agency. For all CDRL deliverables made outside of the Government specified CM/DM systems, metadata references shall be filed in the system. (CDRL C001, DI-MGMT-81453B/T)

1.1.8 Engineering Data / Document Files

The Contractor shall retain drawings, specifications, and engineering data/document files at the Contractor’s facilities to support this requirement. This data shall include applicable change documentation to clarify and correct discrepancies or update previously delivered drawings or technical orders. The Contractor requires access to A-TEAM as part of this support.

1.1.9 Quality Assurance Program

The Contractor shall perform Quality Assurance in accordance with internal policy and/or the applicable platform procedures for efforts under this requirement.

1.1.10 System Safety Program

The Contractor shall ensure compliance with the applicable platform weapon system safety requirements for efforts under this requirement.

1.1.11 Task Status Review and Meetings

1.1.11.1 The Contractor shall conduct a Task Status Review (TSR) every quarter to include meetings and reviews of all EAs. TSR content shall include, as a minimum, the following items: TI status; EAs awaiting action; EA revisions in-work; action item status from the previous TSR; EAs closed since previous TSR; residual funds available; open task status; forecast date for closure of completed EAs;

FER for EAs and cost reimbursable travel.

1.1.11.2 The current funding status of EAs shall be provided in the FER. The Contractor shall support other meetings, briefings, conferences, reviews, or Technical Interchange Meetings (TIMs), as directed.

Develop and distribute agendas, preparation material, minutes and monitoring of action items for

March 7, 2025 Page 11 of 27 closure. Performance threshold is more than 90% of reported information on all tasks shall be less than 45 calendar days out of date, and 100% of reported information shall be less than 90 calendar days out of date. (DI-

FNCL-81537/T, CDRL: A003, DI-ADMN-81249A/T, CDRL: A004, DI-ADMN-81373/T, CDRL:

A006, and DI-ADMN-81250A/T, CDRL: A005)

1.1.12 Proposal Activity, EA Task Definition, Estimating and Revisions

1.1.12.1 The Contractor shall provide customer support on all EA preparation requests submitted by the Government within scope of this contract. Support consists of coordinating with the Government on describing the scope of proposed EA to ensure both parties understand the intent and deliverables. This coordination should happen prior to submitting a formal Request for Proposal (RFP). Also, develop Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) EAs comprised of a problem statement; background; proposed solution; task description; Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) requirements; cost estimates for labor, travel, and material; ground rules or other special conditions; period of performance; and schedule(s) with milestones and deliveries, as appropriate. For Firm Fixed Price (FFP), CPFF, develop price proposals, to include costs for development of estimates and prices, upon receipt of an RFP from the PCO. These RFPs shall include the developed EAs, CDRL requirements, periods of performance, and will identify required estimating and pricing detail. The EA format is shown in Attachment B of this PWS.

1.1.12.2 Performance threshold for All EA preparation requests in proposal format will be completed (tasking definition and pricing) within the timeframes delineated in Table 1 below. The contractor must notify the Government within 5 business days if the category the request has been classified should be changed.

1.1.12.3 Definitions: “Internal,” as used in this table, is defined as a proposal that is developed solely by the Boeing Oklahoma City personnel and requires no external support such as, but not limited to, Inter- Organizational Work Transactions (IWTs). “External,” as used in this table, is defined as a proposal that is developed by the Boeing Oklahoma City personal and requires external support such as, but not limited, to IWTs. “Material,” as used in this table, is defined as a proposal that requires external suppliers to provide quotes on material for successful execution of engineering assignments.

Table 1

Proposals under TINA 30 calendar days

(internal) 45 calendar days

(external) Proposals over TINA

45 calendar days (internal)

60 calendar days (external)

Proposals Requiring Material 90 calendar days (internal or external)

1.1.13 EA Preparation, Submission, and Task Change Request (TCR)

1.1.13.1 The Contractor shall prepare and submit both new EA(s) and TCR(s) in an electronic format approved by the Government Multi-platform Engineering Services Program Manager (GMESPM) or

March 7, 2025 Page 12 of 27

PCO designee, with details and rationale for labor, material and travel requirements. Ensure that the system engineering approach is used when creating or revising an EA(s).

1.1.13.2 The Contractor shall, upon request from the GMESPM, or designee, assist the Government with identified and defined EA revision requirements.

1.1.13.3 Any activity related to a FAA certificated part, specifically including KC-46 parts, shall appropriately utilize a DER or E-UM.

1.1.14 Change Analysis and Coordination

The Contractor shall provide or perform a technical review of ongoing program actions and tasks initiated by any source through the PCO against any stock listed item of the weapon system. Determine the potential impact of hardware/software changes on the elements of the weapon system and make recommendations to the Government. Inform the PCO of any situation or anticipated problems that may adversely affect the fulfillment of any requirement for this contract via written notification.

1.1.15 Technical Inquires (TI)

1.1.15.1 The Contractor shall provide customer support on all TI requests submitted by the Government and respond to inquiries from the GMESPM, or PCO designee for engineering assessments and information on questions relating to design data, flight test data, qualification tests, performance, reliability and other areas of interest or concern. This list shall in no way limit the topics that can be discussed when dealing with TI(s). Such responses shall draw on Contractor experience and readily available engineering data.

1.1.15.2 The Government expects to submit up to 63 TI requests each year. Historical average is 37 requests. The historical average effort per TI is less than 15 hours, but some may exceed 30 hours.

1.1.15.3 If the estimated duration of the TI is expected to exceed 21 hours, notify the GMESPM to discuss the most suitable course of action. Prepare a service engineering report documenting the results of the efforts performed during the period of performance. It shall include a list of all data items, including disposition, delivered under this effort as a contract requirement, CDRL or DAL, an accounting of the number of labor hours expended, by labor category, that were required to prepare the reports developed in this task, and the parties involved. This may be incorporated into the annual report for the contract. (DI-MISC-81384/T, CDRL: A00F). Maintain a log of technical inquiries, approximate time spent, parties involved, and subject. This log shall be made available to the AF for review in the data system. Performance expectations are as follows: 85% of TIs completed on time with technically acceptable answers is satisfactory; 92% of TIs completed on time with technically acceptable answers is very good; 100% of TIs completed on time with technically acceptable answers is exceptional. On time is defined as 5 business days for urgent TI’s and 10 business days for routine TI’s. Inquiries shall be considered routine unless they are designated as urgent at the time they are submitted. Any activity related to a FAA certificated part, specifically including KC-46 parts, shall appropriately utilize a DER or E-UM. B-2 support will be provided when authorized by Northrop Grumman. This authorization will typically take the form of email correspondence forwarded by Government personnel where Northrop Grumman has directed the Government to seek assistance from Boeing.

March 7, 2025 Page 13 of 27

1.1.16 B-1 Horizontal Stabilizer Technical Inquiries (HSTI)

1.1.16.1 The Contractor shall perform analysis, recommend dispositions, and develop repair solutions as needed in support of new and ongoing inspections and repairs on B-1 fleet aircraft horizontal stabilizers (DI-MISC-81384/T, CDRL: A00F). Such responses shall provide specialized engineering expertise in support of the implementation of inspections, dispositions, or repairs. If the estimated duration of the HSTI is expected to exceed 40 hours, notify the GMESPM to discuss the most suitable course of action.

In such cases, at the government's discretion, a supplemental HSTI request may be submitted to cover any additional costs.

1.1.16.2 The Government expects to submit up to 45 HSTI requests each year. The average effort per HSTI is less than 30 hours, but some may exceed 80 hours.

1.1.16.3 Prepare a service engineering report documenting the results of the efforts performed during the period of performance. It shall include a list of all data items, including disposition, delivered under this effort as a contract requirement, CDRL or DAL, an accounting of the number of labor hours expended, by labor category, that were required to prepare the reports developed in this task, and the parties involved. This may be incorporated into the annual report for the contract. (DI-MISC-81384/T, CDRL:

A00F). Maintain a log of technical inquiries, approximate time spent, parties involved, and subject. This log shall be made available to the AF for review in the data system. Performance expectations are as follows: 85% of TIs completed on time with technically acceptable answers is satisfactory; 92% of TIs completed on time with technically acceptable answers is very good; 100% of TIs completed on time with technically acceptable answers is exceptional. On time is defined as 5 business days for urgent TI’s and 10 business days for routine TI’s. Inquiries shall be considered routine unless they are designated as urgent at the time they are submitted.

1.1.17 Commodities Drawing Cleanup

1.1.17.1 Provide a minimum of 500 sheets of releasable existing Contractor engineering data at the request of the Government as cost and schedule allow. (DI-SESS-8100E/T, CDRL: A002) Boeing will complete sheet deliveries above the minimum requirement as cost and schedule allow. If funds do not allow, then completion will resume on a follow-on task order.

1.1.17.2 The Contractor shall incorporate Advance Drawing Change Notices (ADCNs) as necessary to deliver engineering data to the Government. If the ADCN is/are not required to be incorporated and the Government does not request incorporation, the ADCN(s) shall be delivered with the drawing.

Engineering data includes released 3D CAD models for drawings requested if the models currently exist. Best-estimated quantity is 13 drawing requests per month, or 42 sheets delivered per month. (DI-

SESS-81000E/T, CDRL: A002)

1.1.17.3 All data requests shall be delivered within 90 calendar days of request unless mutually agreed to by both the Government and the Contractor. An average delivery time of 90 calendar days is satisfactory. An average delivery time of 45 calendar days is very good. An average delivery time of 30 days is exceptional. A penalty shall be levied for every data request for existing data not fulfilled within 90 days.

March 7, 2025 Page 14 of 27

1.1.17.4 Activities in this paragraph are defined as Drawing Cleanup Actions. The Contractor shall create ADCN(s) that result from technical inquiries in paragraph 1.1.15. The Contactor shall have 90 days after the technical inquiry is completed to deliver the ADCN. The Contractor shall incorporate existing ADCN(s), incorporate Government engineering orders, and clean-up illegible engineering data when requested by the Government. Best-estimated quantity is two per month. (DI-SESS-81000E/T, CDRL: A002) The contractor shall have 90 days to deliver data in these circumstances.

1.1.17.5 The Contractor shall convert handwritten face of drawing Parts List to a separate machine generated Parts List (CMPRO) when review indicates it will save time during ADCN incorporation.

Additional parts list will only be converted to a separate parts list (CMPRO) if the data has been identified for future use by the Government Program Depot Maintenance (PDM) and/or Management of Items Subject to Repair (MISTR). (DI- SESS-81000E/T, CDRL: A002)

1.1.17.6 During the review and research of drawing request(s), Contractor shall notify and supply a ROM to the Government requestor for any unusually large amount of estimated hours needed for data clean-up and/or updates that require Material and Processes (M&P) review and approval. The ROM should include the items marked for clean-up updates, and if revision to a separate parts list (CMPRO) is recommended. The ROM shall be delivered via email and shall be included as part of the Service Engineering Report. (DI-MISC-81384/T, CDRL: A00F)

1.1.17.7 Prepare a Service Engineering Report (SER) documenting the results of the efforts performed under this task including all ROMs that were provided to the Government. The engineering report shall also identify the material purchased under this EA as well as the location/disposition of the material purchased and any GFP provided in support of this EA. Additionally, a list of all data items, including disposition, delivered under this effort as a contract requirement, CDRL or DAL, shall be incorporated.

The Contractor shall prepare a closure letter in the CEDMS database in conjunction with the SER. This report can be incorporated into the annual report for the contract. (DI-MISC-81384/T, CDRL: A00F)

1.1.17.8 No new 3D CAD models will be prepared by this task. A sheet is defined as a page of engineering data requiring the placement of a distribution statement. Thus, any parts lists or typed documents delivered will count as only one delivered sheet.

1.1.17.9 Technical data delivered under the “Commodities Drawing Cleanup” shall retain the same data rights as previously negotiated or marked. The intent of delivery is not to change the data rights of technical data requested. If it was marked “Unlimited” it will remain marked “Unlimited”. This is typical of B-1 and B-52 drawings. If it was marked “Boeing Rights Guards” per last negotiated agreement 31 May 2019, it will remain marked “Boeing Rights Guard”. This requires the contract number from the original delivery of the document to be marked on the document. The Government will provide this number. This does not include process specifications. This is typical of some E-3 and KC- 135 drawings. If it was marked “Limited Rights” it will remain marked “Limited Rights”. This is typical of some E-3 and KC-135 drawings. “Limited Rights” with expiration dates shall retain those dates to indicate when the Government gained “Unlimited Rights”.

1.2 ENGINEERING SERVICES

March 7, 2025 Page 15 of 27

The Contractor shall provide engineering services as authorized by EAs and shall respond to EAs worked under this contract. Unless otherwise specified in the applicable EA, adhere to all performance and interface requirements of the system specifications for the applicable platform and all sub-tier specifications, applicable documents, and design documents shall be adhered to.

1.2.1 Data

The Contractor shall ensure compliance with the CDRL delivery, quality, and data management procedures as specified in the weapon system’s respective CM/DM Plans. All CDRLs (DD Form 1423), Data Items Descriptions (DIDs), and other documents necessary to the performance of this contract are cited on the Non-Recurring CDRL Index attachment of the basic contract. The Government reserves the right to add items not listed. The most current versions of these documents at the time of contract order award apply to this PWS. Individual EAs will reference CDRLs for all applicable documents. Any additional reference documents not found on the CDRL index, such as program specifications, will be identified within individual EAs. EA requests will tailor the specific terms of Non-Recurring CDRLs.

Data generated as a result of this contract and not required to be submitted by CDRL shall be identified on the Data Accession List (DAL). The Contractor shall ensure DAL items are digitally available via the Government specified CM/DM system. Classified Non-CDRL documents shall have unclassified titles and shall be listed on the DAL. Classified documents requested through the DAL shall be sent by normal procedures for classified data. The Contractor shall generate, store, and submit unclassified CDRL and DAL data electronically in the Government specified CM/DM system. The Contractor shall address exceptions to data submittals with the Government, and such exceptions shall be documented on individual CDRLs. For all CDRL deliverables made outside of the Government specified CM/DM systems, metadata references shall be filed in the system. (CDRL C001, DI-MGMT-81453B/T)

1.2.2 Meetings

The Contractor shall support meetings, briefings, conferences, reviews, or TIMs. Support shall include coordination with designated Government personnel, development and distribution of agendas prior to meeting, preparation and distribution of briefing material prior to meeting, preparation and distribution of minutes, and monitoring action items for closure.

1.2.3 EA Revisions

In coordination with the Government, the Contractor shall identify and define EA revision requirements.

Preparation and submission of the EA revision will occur under paragraph 1.1.12. Performance evaluation of individual EA’s will include the number of times a revision is made to increase period of performance, increase budget, or reduce the scope of work. During the life of an EA no change is very good, and one change is satisfactory. Performance evaluation of the contract shall include the number of times a revision is made to increase period of performance, increase budget, or reduce the scope of work on all EA’s during the base or any option year. During any option year, no more than three contract modifications are satisfactory, no more than two contract modifications are very good rating, and only one contract modifications is exceptional.

1.2.4 Associate Contractors

March 7, 2025 Page 16 of 27

The Contractor shall prepare, execute, and maintain Associate Contractor Agreements (ACAs) when required.

1.2.5 Configuration Management

The Contractor shall identify any unique Configuration Management requirements for each EA.

1.2.6 Quality Assurance

The Contractor shall identify any unique Quality Assurance requirements for each EA.

1.2.7 Safety

The Contractor shall identify any unique safety requirements for each EA.

1.2.8 System Engineering

The Contractor shall ensure that system engineering approach is used when specifically required by EA(s).

1.2.9 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS)

Unless otherwise authorized by the Government, the Contractor shall ensure (based on the most currently available data) any product acquired, modified, or developed under this contract are free of known DMSMS impact at time of selection.

1.2.10 Contractor Manpower Reporting

Service Contract Reporting (SCR)

The contractor shall report ALL contractor labor hours (including subcontractor labor hours) required for performance of services provided under this contract via a secure data collection site. The contractor is required to completely fill in all required data fields in the Service Contract Report (SCR) at www.SAM.gov

Reporting inputs will be for the labor executed during the period of performance for each Government fiscal year (FY), which runs 1 October through 30 September. While inputs may be reported any time during the FY, all data shall be reported no later than 31 October* of each calendar year Contractors may direct questions to the SAM.gov service desk (https://www.fsd.gov/fsd-gov/home.do)."

*Reporting Period: Contractors are required to input data by 31 October of each year.

Uses and Safeguarding of Information: Information from the secure web site is considered to be proprietary in nature when the contract number and contractor identity are associated with the direct https://www.fsd.gov/fsd-gov/home.do

March 7, 2025 Page 17 of 27 labor hours and direct labor dollars. At no time will any data be released to the public with the contractor’s name and contract number associated with the data.

User Guide: Data for Air Force service requirements must be input at www.sam.gov. A quick start user guide is available at on the SAM.gov website at https://www.fsd.gov/sys_attachment.do?sys_id=95849fed1be769100ca4a97ae54bcbba.

2.0 SERVICE SUMMARY

Contractor Performance Evaluation

2.0.1 The Contractor shall ensure the performance objectives, performance thresholds, and support for surveillance methods are achieved as follows:

2.0.2 The Contractor shall achieve performance thresholds identified in Table 2 below.

2.0.3 The Contractor shall be aware that the evaluation of performance will occur when the Government evaluates the service of the Contractor to determine whether or not it meets the performance measures of the contract. In the event the performance measure is not met, Contracting Officer Representative (COR) will issue written notification to the Contractor. In those cases, the PCO will take appropriate measures. The Contractor shall have fourteen (14) days to submit a corrective action plan to remedy the performance issue.

3.0 RIGHTS

The primary purpose of the multi-platform contract provides the 848 SCMG engineering with a vehicle to receive engineering assistance and solutions from the OEM on issues affecting structures, avionics, accessories, ground support, and commodity items managed by the 848 SCMG for which the OEM holds the rights to the data required to produce said assistance or solutions. These commodity items are used on B-1, B-2, B-52, C-17, E-3, F-15, KC-135, KC-46 and AGM-86 weapon systems.

Technical specifications, engineering analyses, procedures, drawings, computer software, and models developed exclusively with government funds in the performance of multi-platform will either be (1) contract deliverables, if included in an agreed-to CDRL, or (2) identified as data items on the Data Accession List, if generated in the performance of this contract, and subject to Deferred Ordering under DFARS 252.227-7027 (or Deferred Delivery under DFARS 252.227-7026, to the extent that clause is in the contract and is applicable). The Government shall receive Unlimited Rights in such technical specifications, engineering analyses, procedures, drawings, and models consistent with DFARS 252.227-7013(b)(1) for technical data and DFARS 252.227-7014(b)(1) for computer software.

Non-segregable (unable to segregate a determination of development “exclusively at private expense” or development “exclusively with government funds”) technical specifications, engineering analyses, procedures, drawings, computer software, and models developed with a mix of government funds and private funds will either be (1) contract deliverables, if included in an agreed-to CDRL, or (2) identified as data items on the Data Accession List, if generated in the performance of this contract, and subject to https://www.fsd.gov/sys_attachment.do?sys_id=95849fed1be769100ca4a97ae54bcbba

March 7, 2025 Page 18 of 27

Deferred Ordering under DFARS 252.227-7027 (or Deferred Delivery under DFARS 252.227-7026, to the extent that clause is in the contract and is applicable). The Government shall receive Government Purpose Rights in such technical specifications, engineering analyses, procedures, drawings, and models consistent with DFARS 252.227-7013 (b)(2) for technical data and DFARS 252.227-7014(b)(2) for computer software, or the parties are free to negotiate and mutually agree upon Specially Negotiated License (SNL) rights pursuant to DFARS 252.227-7014(b)(4) for technical data and DFARS 252.227- 7014(b)(4) for computer software.

The Contractor will provide data rights assertion list, along with the rationale, at the time of delivery order/task order proposal delivery for any technical data or computer software required to be delivered under contract and developed exclusively or partially or at private expense. Any updates to the data rights assertion list during the execution of the delivery/task orders/TI/EA/EP/EST (Recurring & Non- Recurring Engineering Services) are subject to Government review and DFARS 252.227-7013 and 252.227-7014 requirements.

The Government shall retain unlimited rights in data and software as prescribed by DFARS 252.227- 7013(b)(1)(ii)-(ix) and DFARS 252.227-7014(b)(1)(ii)-(vi).

Table 2

Performance Objective PWS Para Performance Threshold

Provide customer support on all Technical Inquiry requests submitted by the Government.

1.1.15 Greater than 85% on time (5 business days) with

technically acceptable answers (Urgent) Satisfactory

Greater than 92% on time with technically acceptable answers (Urgent) Very Good

100% on time with technically acceptable answers (Urgent) Exceptional

Greater than 85% on time (10 business days) with technically acceptable answers (Routine) Satisfactory

Greater than 92% on time with technically acceptable answers (Routine) Very Good

100% on time with technically acceptable answers (Routine) Exceptional

Provide customer support on all EA preparation requests submitted by the Government.

1.1.12 All EA requests completed within the requirements of

Table 1.

Responding to EAs worked under this contract.

1.2.3 During the life of an EA no change is very good, and

one change is satisfactory.

March 7, 2025 Page 19 of 27

Engineering Assistance Requests

1.1.2.4.20 Greater than 85% on time with technically acceptable answers (Satisfactory)

Greater than 92% on time with technically acceptable answers (Very Good)

100% on time with technically acceptable answers (Exceptional)

Defense Logistics Agency Form 339

1.1.2.4.20 Greater than 88% on time completion (Satisfactory)

Greater than 96% on time completion (Very Good)

100% on time completion (Exceptional)

Delivery performance of end items

1.2.1 95% of all deliverables are submitted to the Government per CDRL.

Meetings and Reviews 1.1.11.2 90% of reported information on all tasks shall be less than 45 calendar days out of date.

100% of reported information shall be less than 90 calendar days out of date.

Maintain and report all GFP. 1.1.5.1 100% inspection of GFP.

Business Relations 1.2.3 No more than three Contract modifications in relation to period of performance changes (Satisfactory)

No more than two Contract modifications in relation to period of performance changes (Very Good)

Only one Contract modifications in relation to period of performance changes (Exceptional)

Commodities Drawing Cleanup Drawing Cleanup Actions

1.1.17.4 All drawing cleanup actions shall be delivered within 90 calendar days.

Commodities Drawing Cleanup 1.1.17.3 An average delivery time of 90 calendar days is satisfactory. An average delivery time of 45 calendar days is very good. An average delivery time of 30 days is exceptional.

Meeting Materials 1.2.2 Agenda, briefing and minutes distributed in a timely fashion.

March 7, 2025 Page 20 of 27

Quality Assurance Program 1.1.9 Contractor identified quality issues before the Government identifies quality issues.

March 7, 2025 Page 21 of 27

ATTACHMENT A Applicable Documents and Other Requirements

Unless otherwise specified in the applicable Engineering Assignment (EA), Contractor procedures and processes listed below shall be used to the maximum extent possible, provided results are in compliance with the intent and objectives of the work authorized. The documents listed below form a part of this PWS only to the extent specified herein.

NA-97-1363

Current Version

B-1 Configuration Management/Data Management (CM/DM) Plan

SS2569AO1C

B-1B System Specification

EngrSvcs-RD-20 Jul 98

Requirements Document for B-52 Fleet Support Program

NA-93-1636

Integrated System Safety Program plan for the B-1B Conventional Mission Upgrade Program and SIES

NA-96-1423

Current Version

Accident Prevention Safety Program Plan for B-1B Conventional Mission Upgrade Program & BONE Delivery Orders

BMS-QM-112

Quality Manual

D500-14800

Quality Assurance Manual

AS9100B American National Standard, Quality System Model for Quality Assurance in Design, Development, Production, Installation & Servicing

FAR Part 45.5 Management of Government Property in Possession of Contractors

8427025

USAF E-3 (MELD Mission Equipment Location Data

D204-14772-1, -2, 3 and D204N14772-1, -2, -3 and all subsequent Government approved revisions and dash numbers

Configuration Baseline Documents

R-14876-1

USAF E-3 Modification Summary Report

R-N30017-1

E-3 Modification Summary Report

MIL-STD-100E Engineering Drawing Practices

March 7, 2025 Page 22 of 27

MIL-T-310

Technical Data Packages, General Specification for

MIL-STD-882D

Standard Practice for System Safety

ANSI/ASQC Q9001-1994 American National Standard, Quality System - Model for Quality Assurance in Design, Development, Production, Installation and Servicing

MIL-HDBK-1530

General Guidelines for Aircraft Structural Integrity Program

ASMP, OCT 1997

Aircraft Sustainment Master Plan

2182001D

System Specifications for the ALCM

2182002E

Part I Development Specification

2182002 Part II Fabrication Specification for the B-52G/ALCM Air Vehicle

D541-10086-1 (S)

Addendum Specification for B-52/ALCM

D541-10247-1 ALCM/CALCM Engineering Service System Safety Program Plan

AFI-91-103

Air Force Nuclear Safety…