ATTACHMENT 0003 Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 50 KB Posted

Attached to
CBRND Professional Services HQ Draft Task Order Request Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W911QY-24-R-HQ01
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground

About this file

The document is a Performance Assessment Questionnaire used to evaluate an offeror's past performance on federal, state, or local government contracts. It covers areas such as compliance with requirements, project management, timeliness of performance, cost control, and commitment to customer satisfaction. The questionnaire is to be completed by a point of contact who has knowledge of the offeror's past performance. The completed questionnaire will be used in the evaluation of proposals for a federal contract opportunity.

The related federal contract opportunity is a draft Task Order Request (TOR) for acquisition, business, scientific and logistics support services in support of the Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defense (JPEO-CBRND). This is a small business set-aside, with only OASIS+ Small Business contractors eligible to submit proposals. The contract type will be a hybrid of firm-fixed-price and cost-reimbursable CLINs. The evaluation approach will use a phased approach, with a "go/no-go" technical evaluation in Phase One before moving to the full proposal evaluation in Phase Two.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to CBRND Professional Services HQ Draft Task Order Request, newest first.
File Type Posted
Industry Q and A.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 0001 HQs_USAF_PWS.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 0002 Pricing Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TOR RFP JPEO CBRND HQ.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 0001 HQs_USAF_PWS.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter

(Insert Command Letterhead)

(Insert Date)

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) (Insert Solicitation Number)

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army (insert command) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] (insert NAICS). You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return to the (insert Contracting Office and address), no later than 15 days after receipt of request or (insert date), whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire to (insert Contracting Officer/Specialist’s email address).

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at (insert telephone number and/or email address).

Sincerely, (Insert name) Contracting Officer

Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does (and/or) notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

· Substantial Confidence

· Satisfactory Confidence

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: _________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .