Attach No. 16 Past Performance Questionare.docx

29 KB Posted

Attached to
Engineering for Virtualized Enterprise and Remote Access Technology (EVEREST)
Solicitation number
FA875024R1000
Issued by

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This solicitation requests proposals for a cost-plus-fixed-fee indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract to provide research, development, prototyping, integration, testing, demonstration, deployment, upgrades, enhancement, sustainment and training for Engineering for Virtualized Enterprise and Remote Access Technology projects. The Air Force Research Laboratory seeks to award a contract with a maximum ordering amount of $300 million over five years. Proposals are due no later than February 5, 2024. At time of award, the successful offeror must be able to provide 25% TS-cleared personnel and obtain SCI clearance for them within six months, and have 50% with secret or collateral clearance. The North American Industry Classification System code is 541511. This is a full and open competition with no set-aside.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
EVEREST RFP Q and A Responses.pdf PDF
FA8750-24-R-1000 RFP Final Rev 1 03 JAN 2024.pdf PDF
FA8750-24-R-1000 RFP Final.pdf PDF
Attach No. 12 Research and Related Senior Key Person Profile (Expanded).pdf PDF
Pricing Template_Fee_Sample Task Order (STO).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
EVEREST Draft RFP Q and A Responses.pdf PDF
Pricing Template_Fee_Task Order 1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IN

ACCORDANCE WITH FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

INSTRUCTIONS FOR REFERENCE

You have been identified as a past performance reference for solicitation FA8750-24-R-1000 Engineering for Virtualized Enterprise and Remote Access Technology (EVEREST) issued by the Air Force Research Laboratory, Rome NY. To assist the Government in evaluating the past performance of the Offeror identifying you as a reference, please complete this Past Performance Questionnaire, then return it by email to the Contracting personnel identified below. If the Offeror performed additional contracts for your organization, please provide past performance information on those contracts as well.

Roman Zhuk / Terrence B. Lipinski
AFRL/RIKD
26 Electronic Pkwy
Rome NY 13441-4514
roman.zhuk@us.af.mil / terrence.lipinski@us.af.mil

The individual knowledgeable of the contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall performance should complete this questionnaire. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge of the contractor’s performance with the judgment of others within their organization, as applicable. Thank you for your assistance.

1.REFERENCE NAME:
POSITION:
ADDRESS:
TEL:
EMAIL:
2.CONTRACT #:
PROGRAM NAME:
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION:

3. RELATIONSHIP AND TIME INVOLVED WITH OFFEROR:

4. WHAT, IF ANY, ELEMENTS OF WORK WERE SUBCONTRACTED? PLEASE INCLUDE AN ESTIMATE OF THE PERCENTAGE OF WORK THAT WAS SUBCONTRACTED.

5. RELEVANCE TO SOLICITATION:

Please rate the offeror’s performance using the scale below.

E
VG
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

EVALUATION AREAS

I. Technical Capability E VG S M U N

1.
Knowledge and expertise in the technical areas required by the contract / program and in identifying relevant policy limitations.
2.
Ability to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract / program and demonstrate knowledge of relevant technical solutions.
3.
Ability to develop and implement improvements in the technical areas required by the contract / program, such as seizing new, high-value technical opportunities across a range of technical domains.
4.
Knowledge and expertise in applying quality assurance principles during engineering, operations, and maintenance activities.
5.
Knowledge and expertise in fulfilling Program Management responsibilities.
6.
Workmanship and conformance to specifications.
7.
Providing services that meet or exceeded contract requirements.
8.
Providing cost effective services. If there were significant changes over the course of the contract / effort, please explain below.

Comments:

II. Timely Performance E VG S M U N

1.
Meeting established frequency requirements to complete work on time with acceptable quality.
2.
Performing work without the issuance of corrective action requests, including “cure” or “show cause” notices. (If a notice was issued, please describe the circumstances in the comments section and identify how the situation was resolved.)
3.
Providing timely proposals and responses to contract changes, if any.
4.
Submitting progress schedules and interim progress reports, as required.
5.
Providing deliverables/submittals, as required.

Comments:

III. Management Effectiveness E VG S M U N

1.
Providing experienced, qualified personnel with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements when needed.
2.
Hiring quality subcontractors, including small businesses, and effectively managing and coordinating their work.
3.
Ensuring personnel successfully adapted to change.
4.
Paying employees/subcontractors fully and on time.
5.
Cooperating to resolve problems, attending meetings, and maintaining effective communication to ensure satisfactory resolution.

Comments:

IV. Contract Administration E VG S M U N

1.
Providing complete, correct, and timely documentation.
2.
Being adaptable and responsive to administrative issues.
3.
Complying with SB subcontracting and related rules.

Comments:

V. Compliance with Security and Safety Standards E VG S M U N

1.
Adhering to security requirements specifically identified in the specifications or other contract documents, policies/procedures for safeguarding classified information, and facility security.
2.
Maintaining a safe work environment and participating in organizational / institutional safety initiatives.

Comments:

VI. Overall Performance E VG S M U N

1.
Please rate the contractor’s overall performance.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (attach additional sheets as necessary):

Attachment 16 16 June 2023

FA8750-24-R-1000

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .