About this file

This document contains a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) and details of a related federal solicitation for litigation support services. The QASP outlines critical performance elements including adherence to schedules and deliverables, as well as past performance, and defines surveillance methods and acceptable quality levels. Performance will be assessed quarterly and annually, with incentives for quality and timely work, and potential termination for unsatisfactory performance. The related solicitation was issued by the Department of the Navy Naval Supply Systems Command to provide litigation support services to the Office of the General Counsel in defense of claims against the United States before the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal. The firm fixed price contract would have a one year base period of performance from October 2021 to September 2022 and include four optional one-year extensions.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N0018921RZ057_0003.pdf PDF
Attach_VI_GFE.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N0018921RZ057_0002.pdf PDF
N0018921RZ057_0001.pdf PDF
N0018921RZ057.pdf PDF
Attach_IV_CAP.pdf PDF
Attach_I_CDRL_IR DD1423 part 1 FY22.pdf PDF
Attach_I_CDRL_IR DD1423 part 2 FY22.pdf PDF
Attach_II_DD254.pdf PDF
Attach_I_CDRL_IR DD1423 part 3 FY22.pdf PDF
Attach_V_Past Performance Information Form.docx DOCX document
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN

Purpose: To ensure that the Government has an effective and systematic method of surveillance for the services in the PWS. The QASP will be used primarily as a tool to verify that the contractor is performing all services required by the PWS in a timely, accurate and complete fashion.

1. Critical performance processes and requirements. Critical to the performance of litigation services in support of The Naval Litigation Office of the Office of the General Counsel (OGC) is the timely, accurate and thorough completion of all contract/task order requirements.

2. Performance Standards

a. Schedule - The due dates for deliverables and the actual accomplishment of the schedule will be assessed against original due dates and milestones established for the contract or task order(s).

b. Deliverables – The deliverables required to be submitted will be assessed against the specifications for the deliverables detailed in the contract/task order(s) and the Quality Control Plan (QCP), if required by the contract, for the required content, quality, timeliness, and accuracy.

c. Past Performance - In addition to any schedule, deliverables, and cost aspects of performance discussed above, pursuant to FAR 42.15, the Government will assess the contractor’s record of conforming to contract requirements and to standards of good workmanship, the contractor’s adherence to contract schedules including the administrative aspects of performance, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction, and the contractor’s business-like concern for the interest of the customer.

3. Surveillance methods: The primary methods of surveillance used to monitor performance of this contract will include, but not be limited to, random or planned sampling, periodic or inspection, and validated customer complaints.

4. Performance Measurement: Performance will be measured in accordance with the following table:

Performance

Element Performance Requirement

Surveillance Method Frequency Acceptable Quality Level

Contractor Quality Control Plan

QC activities, inspections, and corrective actions completed as required by the plan.

Inspection by the COR Quarterly for overall QC activities;

100% Compliance with the contractor plan. As Required for corrective actions.

(If required by the contract)

Contract Deliverables

Contract deliverables furnished as prescribed in the PWS, attachments, CDRLs, Task Orders, etc., as applicable.

Inspection by the COR 100% inspection of all contract deliverables.

>95% of deliverables submitted timely and without rework required.

Overall Contract Performance

Overall contract performance of sufficient quality to earn a Satisfactory (or higher) rating in the COR’s annual report on Contractor

Performance

Assessment by the COR Annual All performance elements rated Satisfactory (or higher)

Invoicing Monthly invoices per contract procedures are timely and accurate.

Review & acceptance of the invoice

Monthly 100% accuracy

If performance is within acceptable levels, it will be considered to be satisfactory. If not, overall performance may be considered unsatisfactory.

Incentives/Disincentives:

The COR’s makes an annual report on Contractor Performance (CPARS or other annual report). The contractor’s failure to achieve satisfactory performance under the contract/task order, reflected in the COR’s annual report, may result in termination of the contract/task order and may also result in the loss of future Government contracts/task orders. The contractor’s failure to achieve satisfactory performance under the contract/task order may result in the non-exercise of available options

For each item that does not meet acceptable levels, the Government may issue a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR). CDRs will be forwarded to the Contracting Officer with a copy sent to the contractor. The contractor must reply in writing within 5 days of receipt identifying how future occurrences of the problem will be prevented. Based upon the contractor’s past performance and plan to solve the problem, the Contracting Officer will determine if any further action will be taken.

In accordance with the inspection of services provisions of the contract, the contractor will be incentivized to provide quality products in a timely manner since the Government can require the Contractor, at no additional cost, to replace or correct work that fails to meet contract requirements.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .