Attach 7 Past Performance Questionaire.pdf
PDF 727 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Integrated Pest Management Services - MacDill AFB, FL Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA481420TF075
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 2 - FA481420TF075 Combo.pdf | ||
| Amendment 1 - Pest Management Q_As.pdf | ||
| Attach 5 Provisions and Clauses.pdf | ||
| Attach 1 PWS Pest Management 30 Jun 20.pdf | ||
| Attach 6 Wage Determination Rev11 2015_4571 18Jun2020.pdf | ||
| FA481420TF075 Combined Synopsis Soliciation.pdf | ||
| Attach 3 Bid Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attach 2 Appendix F PWS Attachments.pdf | ||
| Attach 4 Evaluation Factors.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor:
B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to:
C. Contract number:
D. Contract type:
E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes No
F. Period of performance:
G. Initial contract cost: $
H. Current/final contract cost: $
I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:
J. Description of service provided:
SECTION 2. CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or agency name:
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:
SECTION 3. EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator's name:
B. Evaluator's title:
C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:
D. Number of year’s evaluator worked on subject contract:
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL- The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
P PURPLE/VERY GOOD- The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
G GREEN/SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements.
The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.
Technical Performance
B P G Y R N T1 Quality & repeatability of operations & maintenance.
T2. Quality of technical system testing and certification efforts
T3 Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts
T4 Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements
T5 Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures
Program Management
B P G Y R N P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)
P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts
P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)
P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer
P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.
Transition/phase-in
T/PI1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.
T/PI2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.
Employee Retention/Attraction
E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.
E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.
E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.
2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes Default Convenience Pending Terminations No
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?
What were the contractor’s most negative aspect in the performance of the contract?
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
E-Mail Address: amy.soeder@us.af.mil, wanda.noel@us.af.mil, and michael.terranova.5@us.af.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .