Att_L-5_Government_QA_Responses_25R0005.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 493 KB Posted

Attached to
Q&A Response-DRAFT: Royal Saudi Naval Forces (RSNF) Surface Training Systems Sustainment
Solicitation number
N6134025R0005
Issued by

About this file

This is a Questions and Answers response document related to a draft solicitation for the Royal Saudi Naval Forces (RSNF) Surface Training Systems Sustainment requirement being managed by the Department of the Navy Naval Air Systems Command. The file appears to be an Excel spreadsheet containing industry questions and government responses to the draft solicitation N6134025R0005, though the specific content of the Q&A is not provided in the given excerpt.

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Q&A

N6134025R0005, Royal Saudi Naval Forces (RSNF) Surface Training Systems Sustainment Question and Answer Form, Attachment L-5

Date of
RequestQuestion Number
TopicSubject (title)QuestionQuestion Reference (SOW/CSP/CDRL, L&M, Page #s, etc)Government Response
2/12/251DCTU - JeddahThe Damage Control Training Unit (DCTU) in Jeddah was described in previous industry interactions to include Industry Day. Was the removal from the current Draft SOW intentional?SOW Para 1.7 Page 6This information was inadvertently left off. The final RFP (i.e. SOW) will include DCTU at Jeddah.
2/12/252KSA Business LicenseIs it acceptable to present a different name on the KSA busines license if the offeror and the registered business in KSA are wholly owned by the same company?RFP Section L Part B Vol 1 Para 1.1 Page 63Please see the revised RFP Section L language.
2/12/253Incomplete ParagraphPara 1.3 "Hiring and Staffing Plan" appears cut off. Could this be clarified?RFP Section L Part B Vol 1 Para 1.3 Page63Yes, text was inadvertently cut off. RFP Section L Part B Vol 1 Para 1.3 has been updated.
2/12/254Past PerformanceIndustry day discussed the previous program ending Mar 2020, this is no over 5 years. Would the government consider allowing past performance that completed within the last 10 years provided that stated performance is highly relavent and directly related to this solicitation?RFP Section L Part B Vol 2 Para 2.1 Page64No, the Government will not consider past performance completed within 10 years. However, due to the gap in service and considering COVID impacts across many past performance records, the Government will revise the RFP to consider past performance records completed within the last seven years.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

&"Arial,Bold"&12N6134020R0048, Engineering, Fire Fighting and Damage Control Contractor Instuctor Services (ECIS) Question and Answer Form

Solicitation Question Form&"Arial,Bold"&14SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION&12
When Filled In&P of &N

All Solicitation questions shall be submitted and will be answered using this form.

image1.png image2.emf

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .