ATT 7 - W912DY26QA249 - Navy Multi Locations Recreational Furniture.docx
DOCX document 51 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912DY26QA249
About this file
This file is an attachment to a Request for Quote (RFQ) for recreational furniture procurement. The RFQ, designated W912DY26QA249, is issued by the Department of the Army Corps of Engineers, Huntsville Center, for the procurement of recreational furnishings across multiple Naval installations including NAVSTA Rota, Djibouti; NAVSTA Guantanamo Bay; Naval Base Guam; and NAVSTA Norfolk. The quote submission deadline is 12:00 PM Central Time on August 10, 2026, with all quotes required to be valid for 120 days. Vendors must submit quotes via email to Travian.A.James@usace.army.mil and CEHNC-FurnitureQuotes@usace.army.mil and include the completed Standard Form 1449 (SF1449), Excel version of Attachment 1 with pricing, and Word version of Attachment 7, along with any FTP access information if applicable.
Vendors must complete the SF1449 with company name and signature, provide unit prices and extended amounts for all line items (CLINs) that match pricing in Attachment 1, and follow specific email subject line formatting requirements that include company name, RFQ number, project name and buildings, and email sequence number. Questions must be submitted no later than 12:00 PM Central Time on July 22, 2026. This solicitation does not indicate any small business set-asides, GSA Schedule requirements, or other special contracting vehicles; it is a direct competitive RFQ through the Army Corps of Engineers.
View the file
Other files
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Technical Review Round #1 Navy, Multi Locations, Recreational Furniture Contractor Instructions: The Technical Documents Checklist must be completed and returned in Word format by the contractor. Each contractor shall demonstrate in written form how they are meeting the FID (Att. 2) requirements. Manufacturer’s published catalogs and CAD drawings are acceptable forms of demonstrations. A blanket statement that the contractor is “meeting the FID requirement” or a quote submitted without the necessary documentation is considered non-conforming. Contractors must comment in the light blue fields only, in black text. HNC’s comments in the white fields will be in either red text when the item is technically unacceptable or black text when the item is technically acceptable. Contractor shall not modify prior rounds or HNC comments. If new products are provided in consequent technical review rounds, in the Attachment 1 the contractor should bold the font in the cells that change in columns E, F, and G, Vendor Quoted, Product Line Quoted, and Model Quoted, respectively.
Technical Documents Checklist
Contractor:
Point of Contact for this RFQ:
Email Address:
Telephone Number:
Contractor: Answer questions 1-3.
1. Are technical documents organized sequentially according to the Furniture Item Descriptions (FID)?
Yes
No
If no, do not continue. To be considered for award, technical documents shall be as stated above.
2. Do all quoted items meet all current required warranties?
Yes
No
If no, do not continue. To be considered for award, all items shall meet current warranties.
3. Are technical documents annotated to draw attention to the construction requirements and item descriptions required in the FID?
Yes
No
If no, do not continue. To be considered for award, technical documents shall be as stated above.
Contractor: Do not go beyond this point until requested as a response to clarifications / communications by HNC.
HNC Clarification/Comment - white fields Contractor Reply- light blue fields
(Insert Excel Table From Att 1 Tech Review Tab)
To be completed by HNC only:
1st Round Technical Review
| Technically Acceptable: |
| Yes: |
No:
Date:
HNC Technical Evaluator:
Comments:
2nd Round Technical Review
| Technically Acceptable: |
| Yes: |
No:
Date:
HNC Technical Evaluator:
Comments:
3rd Round Technical Review
| Technically Acceptable: |
| Yes: |
No:
Date:
HNC Technical Evaluator:
Comments:
4th Round Technical Review
| Technically Acceptable: |
| Yes: |
No:
Date:
HNC Technical Evaluator:
Comments:
Attachment #8 2
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .